IP Library Granted Patent US 9,384,256
Granted Patent B2
US 9,384,256 · App. 14/477,982 · Granted Jul 5, 2016

Reporting and summarizing metrics in sparse relationships on an OLTP database

Inventors: Biswadeep Banerjee (Bangalore, IN); Michael L. Lamb (Leander, TX); Mack E. Phelps (Raleigh, NC); Vishnukumar T Santharam (Bangalore, IN)
Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
G06F17/30592G06F17/30292G06F17/30339G06F17/30424G06F17/30457G06F17/30557
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,384,256
App. No.
14/477,982
Granted
Jul 5, 2016
Kind
B2
Abstract

Storing and/or accessing data in a transactional database, with use of the following technique: (i) selecting a set of base tables in a transactional database; and (ii) creating a factless materialized query table, having maximum sparsity, for the set of base tables. The set of base tables includes at least two base tables. The set of base tables includes a set of keys including at least two distinct primary keys. The factless materialized query table includes one record associated with each record in the set of base tables. Each record in the materialized query table includes a value for every primary key in the set of base tables.

Claims (18)

1. A method comprising:

selecting a set of base tables in a transactional database; and

creating a factless materialized query table, having maximum sparsity, for the set of base tables;

wherein:

the set of base tables includes at least two base tables;

the set of base tables includes a set of keys including at least two distinct primary keys;

the factless materialized query table includes one record associated with each record in the set of base tables; and

each record in the materialized query table includes a value for every primary key in the set of base tables.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the transactional database is part of an online transaction processing system.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein:

in the creation of the materialized query table, a null flag is assigned for every primary key value in every record in the materialized query table where the corresponding record(s) in the set of base tables does not include that primary key.

4. The method of claim 3 wherein:

in the creation of the materialized query table, each record of the materialized query table is created to include a determinant that uniquely identifies a level of granularity for that materialized query table record.

5. The method of claim 4 further comprising:

receiving a user query; and

responding to the user query based, at least in part, upon at least one determinant in the materialized query table.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein:

the selection of the base tables of the set of base tables causes the MQT created upon the set of selected base tables to join multiple dimensions.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 19, 2021
From: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
To: ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED
Reel/Frame 055339/0415 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 5, 2020
From: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
To: ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED
Reel/Frame 053970/0339 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 5, 2014
From: BANERJEE, BISWADEEP; LAMB, MICHAEL L.; PHELPS, MACK E.; SANTHARAM, VISHNUKUMAR T
To: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 033674/0405 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 14075195 · Nov 8, 2013
Related Publication 20150134599A1 · May 14, 2015