IP Library Granted Patent US 9,429,062
Granted Patent B2
US 9,429,062 · App. 14/479,643 · Granted Aug 30, 2016

Method and algorithm for performing an NH3 sensor rationality diagnostic

Inventors: Andrew W. Osburn (Nashville, IN); Feng Liu (Greenwood, IN); Mert Geveci (Delmar, NY)
Assignee: Cummins Inc.
F01N11/00B01D53/9431B01D53/9495F01N3/103F01N3/208F01N3/2066F01N2560/021F01N2560/026F01N2900/0416Y02T10/24Y02T10/47
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,429,062
App. No.
14/479,643
Granted
Aug 30, 2016
Kind
B2
Abstract

An example method includes interpreting an NH 3 composition value at a position upstream of a selective reduction catalyst (SCR) element fluidly disposed in the exhaust conduit of an engine, interpreting a NO x composition value at a position downstream of the SCR element, and determining an NH 3 sensor rationality threshold in response to the upstream NH 3 composition value. The method further includes determining an NH 3 sensor health value as indicating a sensor failure in response to the downstream NO x composition value exceeding the NH 3 sensor rationality threshold.

Claims (138)

1. A system, comprising:

an internal combustion engine producing an exhaust stream as a byproduct of operation; an exhaust conduit fluidly coupled to the engine, and structured to receive the exhaust stream; a selective reduction catalyst (SCR) element fluidly disposed in the exhaust conduit, the SCR catalyst having an upstream side and a downstream side;

an NH 3 sensor operationally coupled to the exhaust conduit and structured to provide an upstream side NH 3 composition value;

a NO x sensor operationally coupled to the exhaust conduit at a position downstream of the SCR element and structured to provide a downstream side NO x composition value; and

a controller, comprising;

a composition module structured to interpret the upstream NH 3 composition value and the downstream NO x composition value;

an NH 3 sensor threshold module structured to determine an NH 3 sensor rationality threshold in response to the upstream NH 3 composition value; and

an NH 3 sensor diagnostic module structured to determine an NH 3 sensor health value for the NH 3 sensor in response to a comparison of the downstream NO x composition value and the NH 3 sensor rationality threshold.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the NH 3 sensor diagnostic module is further structured to determine the NH 3 sensor health value as indicating a sensor failure in response to the downstream NO x composition value exceeding the NH 3 sensor rationality threshold.

3. The system of claim 2 , wherein the NH 3 sensor diagnostic module is further structured to determine the NH 3 sensor health value as indicating an in-range failure in response to the upstream NH 3 composition value being an in-range value.

4. The system of claim 1 , further comprising a second SCR element disposed in the exhaust conduit at a position upstream of the NH 3 sensor.

5. The system of claim 1 , further comprising an ammonia oxidation catalyst (AMOX) disposed in the exhaust conduit at a position downstream of the NH 3 sensor and upstream of the NO x sensor.

6. The system of claim 5 , further comprising a second SCR element disposed in the exhaust conduit at a position upstream of the NH 3 sensor.

7. The system of claim 6 , wherein the NH 3 sensor diagnostic module is Wither structured to determine the NH 3 sensor health value as failed in response to the euuation

NOx

(

AMOX

downstream

)

>

x

ANR

(

1

-

η

2

)

+

(

x

-

x

ANR

η

2

)

(

1

-

η

3

)

;

wherein NOx(AMOX downstream )comprises the downstream side NO x composition value, wherein x comprises the upstream side NH 3 composition value, wherein η 2 comprises a NO x conversion efficiency on the SCR catalyst, wherein η 3 comprises an AMOX conversion efficiency, and wherein ANR omprises an NH 3 to NO x ratio.

8. The system of claim 7 , wherein the NH 3 sensor diagnostic. module is further structured to determine the NH 3 sensor health value as failed in-range in response to the NH 3 sensor health value being failed, and the value x being within operational limits of the NH 3 sensor.

9. The system of claim 6 , wherein the NH 3 sensor diagnostic module is further structured to determine the NH3 sensor health value as failed in response to the equation

NOx

(

AMOX

downstream

)

>

x

ANR

(

1

-

η

2

)

+

(

x

-

x

ANR

η

2

)

;

wherein NOx(AMOX downstream ) comprises the downstream side NOx composition value, wherein x comprises the upstream side NH 3 composition value, wherein η 2 comprises a NO x conversion efficiency on the SCR catalyst, and wherein ANR comprises an NH 3 to NO x ratio.

10. The system of claim 9 , wherein the NH 3 sensor diagnostic module is further structured to determine the NH 3 sensor health value as failed in-range in response to the NH 3 sensor health value being failed, and the value x being within operational limits of the NH 3 sensor.

11. The system of claim 1 , wherein the NH 3 sensor rationality threshold comprises the downstream NO x composition value.

12. The system of claim 1 , wherein the NH 3 sensor rationality threshold comprises a multiple of the downstream NO x composition value, wherein the multiple comprises a value between 0.9 and 8.0.

13. The system of claim 1 , wherein the NH 3 sensor diagnostic module is further structured to determine the NH 3 sensor health value as failed in response to the equation

NOx

(

SCR

downstream

)

>

x

ANR

(

1

-

η

2

)

+

(

x

-

x

ANR

η

2

)

;

wherein NOx(SCR downstream ) comprises the downstream side NO x composition value, wherein x comprises the upstream side NH 3 composition value, wherein η 2 comprises a NOx conversion efficiency on the SCR catalyst, wherein ANR comprises an NH 3 to NO x ratio, and wherein k is a cross-sensitivity of the NO x sensor to NH 3 .

14. The system of claim 13 , wherein the NH 3 sensor diagnostic module is further structured to determine the NH 3 sensor health value as failed in-range in response to the NH 3 sensor health value being failed, and the value x being within operational limits of the NH 3 sensor.

15. An electronic controller with instructions on a non-transitory computer readable medium operable to execute a method, comprising:

interpreting an NH 3 composition value from an output of an NH 3 sensor at a position upstream of a selective reduction catalyst (SCR) element fluidly disposed in the exhaust conduit of an engine;

interpreting a NO x composition value at a position downstream of the SCR element;

determining an NH 3 sensor rationality threshold in response to the upstream NH 3 composition value; and

determining an NH 3 sensor health value for the NH 3 sensor as indicating a sensor failure in response to the downstream NO x composition value exceeding the NH 3 sensor rationality threshold.

16. The method of claim 15 , further comprising determining the NH 3 sensor health value in response to determining that the SCR catalyst element temperature is within a NOx conversion efficiency range.

17. The method of claim 15 , further comprising determining the NH 3 sensor health value in response to determining that an ammonia oxidation catalyst (AMOX) positioned downstream of the SCR element is within an NH 3 conversion efficiency range.

18. The method of claim 15 , further comprising determining the NH 3 sensor health value in response to determining that the SCR catalyst element temperature is greater than a storage capacity threshold temperature.

19. The method of claim 15 , further comprising estimating a stored NH 3 variation value, and wherein the determining an NH 3 sensor health value further comprises compensating for the stored NH 3 variation value.

20. The method of claim 15 , further comprising determining a NO x conversion efficiency value of the SCR catalyst element, and wherein determining the NH 3 sensor rationality threshold is further in response to the NO x conversion efficiency value.

21. The method of claim 15 , further comprising determining a NO x conversion efficiency value of the SCR catalyst element, determining an NH 3 conversion efficiency value of an ammonia oxidation catalyst (AMOX) positioned downstream of the SCR element, and wherein determining the NH 3 sensor rationality threshold is further in response to the NO x conversion efficiency value and the NH 3 conversion efficiency value.

22. A system for diagnosing a sensor in an exhaust conduit fluidly coupled to an internal combustion engine operable to produce an exhaust stream as a byproduct of operation, the system comprising:

a selective reduction catalyst (SCR) element fluidly disposed in the exhaust conduit, the SCR catalyst having an upstream side and a downstream side;

an NH 3 sensor operationally coupled to the exhaust conduit and structured to provide an upstream side NH 3 composition value;

a NO x sensor operationally coupled to the exhaust conduit at a position downstream of the SCR element and structured to provide a downstream site NO x composition value; and

an electronic controller to determine an NH 3 sensor health value for the NH 3 sensor in response to the upstream NH 3 composition value and the downstream NO x composition value.

23. The system of claim 22 , wherein the electronic controller is further configured to determine an NH 3 sensor rationality threshold in response to the upstream NH 3 composition value.

24. The system of claim 23 , wherein the electronic controller is further configured to indicate a sensor failure in response to the downstream NO x composition value exceeding the NH 3 sensor rationality threshold.

25. The system of claim 24 , wherein the electronic controller is further configured to determine the NH 3 sensor health value indicates an in-range failure.

26. The system of claim 24 , wherein the NH 3 sensor rationality threshold comprises at least one value selected from the values consisting of: the downstream NO x composition value, a multiple of the downstream NO x composition value, wherein the multiple comprises a value between 0.9 and 8.0.

27. The system of claim 24 , wherein the multiple comprises a value selected from the values consisting of: 0.4, 0.5, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, and 8.0.

28. The system of claim 22 , further comprising an ammonia oxidation catalyst disposed in the exhaust conduit at a position downstream of the NH 3 sensor and upstream of the NO x sensor.

29. The system of claim 28 , wherein the electronic controller is further configured to determine whether NH 3 sensor check conditions are present, and prevent determining the NH 3 sensor health value in response to the NH 3 sensor check conditions not being present.

30. The system of claim 29 , wherein the NH 3 sensor check conditions comprise at least one condition selected from the conditions consisting of: an SCR catalyst element storage capacity being lower than a threshold value, the SCR catalyst element being saturated with adsorbed NH 3 , a temperature of the SCR catalyst element exceeding a threshold, and an exhaust flow value exceeding a threshold.

31. The system of claim 29 , wherein the controller is further configure to perform a sensor failure verification operation.

32. The system of claim 31 , wherein the sensor failure verification operation comprises at least one operation selected from the operations consisting of averaging a plurality of sensor test results, incrementing a fault counter in response to a sensor test indicating a failed sensor, decrementing a fault counter in response to a sensor test indicating a passed sensor, integrating the upstream NH 3 composition value and the downstream NO x composition value over a predetermined period of time and comparing the integrated values to the NH 3 sensor rationality threshold, and modeling NH 3 storage on the SCR catalyst and accounting for the storage in the sensor failure verification operation.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 16, 2015
From: OSBURN, ANDREW W.; LIU, FENG; GEVECI, MERT
To: CUMMINS INC.
Reel/Frame 035425/0670 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation PCTUS2013029675 · Mar 7, 2013
Provisional Application 61607703 · Mar 7, 2012
Related Publication 20140373511A1 · Dec 25, 2014