IP Library Granted Patent US 9,655,795
Granted Patent B2
US 9,655,795 · App. 13/443,234 · Granted May 23, 2017

Occupant support with a migration sensitive bladder and method for migration detection

Inventors: Christopher R O'Keefe (Batesville, IN); Timothy Joseph Receveur (Guilford, IN); Aziz Bhai (Fishers, IN); Luke Gibson (Greensburg, IN); Charles A Lachenbruch (Lakeway, TX); Rachel Williamson (Batesville, IN)
Assignee: Hill-Rom Services, Inc.
A61G7/012A61B5/1036A61B5/1115A61B5/1126A61B5/6892A61G7/002A61G7/015A47C27/083A61B5/447F04C2270/0421
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,655,795
App. No.
13/443,234
Granted
May 23, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for detecting occupant position change on a support surface includes establishing a rate of change of pressure in a head end test zone and in a foot end test zone, comparing the head end rate to at least one head end rate limit, comparing the foot end rate to at least one foot end rate limit, and inferring, in response to the comparing steps, whether or not occupant migration has occurred. An associated occupant support includes a frame and a mattress. The mattress includes head and foot zones each having at least one pressurizable bladder. The support also includes a controller adapted to compare a head end rate of pressure change to a head end rate limit, to compare a foot end rate of pressure change to a foot end rate limit, and to infer, in response to the comparing steps, whether or not occupant migration has occurred.

Claims (37)

1. A method for detecting occupant position change on a support surface having a head end test zone with at least one head end test bladder and a foot end test zone with at least one foot end test bladder, the method comprising:

passively establishing a rate of change of fluid pressure in the head end test zone and;

passively establishing a rate of change of fluid pressure in the foot end test zone;

comparing the head end pressure rate to at least one head end rate limit;

comparing the foot end pressure rate to at least one foot end rate limit; and

inferring, in response to the comparing steps, whether or not occupant migration has occurred.

2. The method of claim 1 comprising preceding the establishment steps by a pressure stability test.

3. The method of claim 1 in which the at least one head end rate limit is a fast head end rate limit, and the at least one foot end rate limit is a fast foot end rate limit.

4. The method of claim 3 in which the inferring step produces a positive result for occupant migration if the established head end pressure rate is slower than the fast head end rate limit or if the established foot end pressure rate is slower than the fast foot end rate limit.

5. The method of claim 3 in which the inferring step produces a positive result for occupant migration if the established head end pressure rate is slower than the fast head end rate limit and if the established foot end pressure rate is slower than the fast foot end rate limit.

6. The method of claim 3 including a slow head end rate limit and a slow foot end rate limit.

7. The method of claim 6 in which the inferring step produces a positive result for occupant migration if the established head end pressure rate is slower than the fast head end rate limit and faster than the slow head end rate limit or if the established foot end pressure rate is slower than the fast foot end rate limit and faster than the slow foot end rate limit.

8. The method of claim 6 in which the inferring step produces a positive result for occupant migration if the established head end pressure rate is slower than the fast head end rate limit and faster than the slow head end rate limit and if the established foot end pressure rate is slower than the fast foot end rate limit and faster than the slow foot end rate limit.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein the inferring step produces a result with regard to occupant migration and the result is accepted as conclusive.

10. The method of claim 1 wherein if the inferring step produces a positive result for occupant migration, the inferring step is followed by a validation step.

11. The method of claim 10 in which the validation test includes

changing at least one of pressure in the head zone and pressure in the foot zone in response to the inferred positive result;

determining a head end pressure derivative based on the change in pressure in the head zone and/or determining a foot end pressure derivative based on the change in the pressure in the foot zone; and

conducting a comparison of the pressure derivative or derivatives and an associated pressure derivative threshold; and

concluding, in response to the conducting step, whether or not occupant migration has occurred.

12. The method of claim 11 in which:

both the pressure in the head zone and the pressure in the foot zone are changed in response to the inferred positive result;

the determining step is carried out for both the head end zone and the foot end zone; and

the concluding step is positive for occupant migration if the comparison for the head end zone, the comparison for the foot end zone, or both indicate occupant migration.

13. The method of claim 9 in which a conclusion of occupant migration is followed by one or more steps comprising:

issuing an alarm;

taking an action intended to mitigate additional migration; and

taking an action to mitigate adverse effects of the migration.

14. The method of claim 10 in which a conclusion of occupant migration is followed by one or more steps comprising:

issuing an alarm;

taking an action intended to mitigate additional migration; and

taking an action to mitigate adverse effects of the migration.

15. The method of claim 11 in which

the change in pressure is an increase in pressure; and

the concluding step is positive for occupant migration if at least one of the following occurs:

the pressure derivative for the head end zone is faster than the pressure derivative threshold associated with the head end zone; and

the pressure derivative for the foot end zone is slower than the pressure derivative threshold associated with the foot end zone.

Assignments (6)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST AT REEL/FRAME 050260/0644 Recorded Dec 14, 2021
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: BREATHE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; HILL-ROM SERVICES, INC.; ALLEN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.; WELCH ALLYN, INC.; HILL-ROM, INC.; VOALTE, INC.; BARDY DIAGNOSTICS, INC.; HILL-ROM HOLDINGS, INC.
Reel/Frame 058517/0001 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Sep 4, 2019
From: HILL-ROM HOLDINGS, INC.; HILL-ROM, INC.; HILL-ROM SERVICES, INC.; ALLEN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.; ANODYNE MEDICAL DEVICE, INC.; VOALTE, INC.; WELCH ALLYN, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 050260/0644 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 3, 2019
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: HILL-ROM SERVICES, INC.; ALLEN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.; WELCH ALLYN, INC.; HILL-ROM COMPANY, INC.; HILL-ROM, INC.; ANODYNE MEDICAL DEVICE, INC.; MORTARA INSTRUMENT, INC.; MORTARA INSTRUMENT SERVICES, INC.; VOALTE, INC.
Reel/Frame 050254/0513 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Sep 26, 2016
From: HILL-ROM SERVICES, INC.; ASPEN SURGICAL PRODUCTS, INC.; ALLEN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.; WELCH ALLYN, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 040145/0445 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 10, 2015
From: ALLEN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.; HILL-ROM SERVICES, INC.; ASPEN SURGICAL PRODUCTS, INC.; WELCH ALLYN, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 036582/0123 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 30, 2012
From: O'KEEFE, CHRISTOPHER R; RECEVEUR, TIMOTHY JOSEPH; BHAI, AZIZ; GIBSON, LUKE; LACHENBRUCH, CHARLES A; WILLIAMSON, RACHEL
To: HILL-ROM SERVICES, INC.
Reel/Frame 028285/0847 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20130263378A1 · Oct 10, 2013