System test compliance tool

1. An apparatus comprising:

a memory configured to store:

a plurality of steps performed during a test;

a configuration for a first test environment in which the test was performed;

a result of the test; and

a test plan comprising:

a plurality of planned steps to be performed during the test; and

a configuration for a second test environment; and

a processor communicatively coupled to the memory, the processor configured to:

compare the plurality of steps performed during the test to the plurality of planned steps to determine that a step of the plurality of planned steps was not performed during the test;

present, on a display, a first chart that indicates each step of the plurality of planned steps and that the determined step of the plurality of planned steps was not performed during the test;

compare the configuration for the first test environment and the configuration for the second test environment to determine whether the first test environment was configured according to the configuration for the second test environment;

present, on the display, a second chart that indicates whether the first test environment was configured according to the configuration for the second test environment;

determine, based on the result of the test, that the test resulted in a failure;

present, on the display, a third chart that indicates the failure; and

deploy an application corresponding to the test plan if each step of the plurality of planned steps was performed during the test, if the first test environment was configured according to the configuration for the second test environment, and if the failure was fixed.

2. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the configuration for the second test environment specifies at least one of an operating system, a patch level, and a hardware specification.

3. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further configured to present, on the display, a fourth chart that indicates:

a plurality of tests; and

whether each test of the plurality of tests corresponds to an existing test plan.

4. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein:

the memory is further configured to store a step that is not included in the test plan; and

the processor is further configured to:

determine whether the step that is not included in the test plan should be included in the test plan; and

present, on the display, a fourth chart that indicates the step that is not included in the test plan if the step that is not included in the test plan should be included in the test plan.

5. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein:

the test verifies whether the application is compliant; and

the application is deployed in response to a determination that the each step of the plurality of planned steps was performed during the test and that the first test environment was configured according to the configuration for the second test environment.

6. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further configured to determine whether the failure has been repaired.

7. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein one or more of the first chart, the second chart, and the third chart further identifies a tester who performed the test.

8. A method comprising:

storing, by a memory, a plurality of steps performed during a test;

storing, by the memory, a configuration for a first test environment in which the test was performed;

storing, by the memory, a result of the test;

storing, by the memory, a test plan comprising:

a plurality of planned steps to be performed during the test; and

a configuration for a second test environment;

comparing, by a processor communicatively coupled to the memory, the plurality of steps performed during the test to the plurality of planned steps to determine that a step of the plurality of planned steps was not performed during the test;

presenting, on a display, a first chart that indicates each step of the plurality of planned steps and that the determined step of the plurality of planned steps was not performed during the test;

comparing, by the processor, the configuration for the first test environment and the configuration for the second test environment to determine whether the first test environment was configured according to the configuration for the second test environment;

presenting, on the display, a second chart that indicates whether the first test environment was configured according to the configuration for the second test environment;

determining, by the processor, based on the result of the test, that the test resulted in a failure;

presenting, on the display, a third chart that indicates the failure; and

deploying, by the processor, an application corresponding to the test plan if each step of the plurality of planned steps was performed during the test, if the first test environment was configured according to the configuration for the second test environment, and if the failure was fixed.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the configuration for the second test environment specifies at least one of an operating method, a patch level, and a hardware specification.

10. The method of claim 8 , further comprising presenting, on the display, a fourth chart that indicates:

a plurality of tests; and

whether each test of the plurality of tests corresponds to an existing test plan.

11. The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

storing, by the memory, a step that is not included in the test plan;

determining, by the processor, whether the step that is not included in the test plan should be included in the test plan; and

presenting, on the display, a fourth chart that indicates the step that is not included in the test plan if the step that is not included in the test plan should be included in the test plan.

12. The method of claim 8 , wherein:

the test verifies whether the application is compliant; and

the application is deployed in response to a determination that the each step of the plurality of planned steps was performed during the test and that the first test environment was configured according to the configuration for the second test environment.

13. The method of claim 8 , further comprising determining, by the processor, whether the failure has been repaired.

14. The method of claim 8 , wherein one or more of the first chart, the second chart, and the third chart further identifies a tester who performed the test.

15. A system comprising:

a compliance management server comprising a memory configured to:

store a plurality of steps performed during a test;

store a configuration for a first test environment in which the test was performed;

store a result of the test; and

store a test plan comprising:

a plurality of planned steps to be performed during the test; and

a configuration for a second test environment; and

a compliance management device communicatively coupled to the compliance management server, the compliance management device comprising a processor configured to:

compare the plurality of steps performed during the test to the plurality of planned steps to determine that a step of the plurality of planned steps was not performed during the test;

present, on a display, a first chart that indicates each step of the plurality of planned steps and that the determined step of the plurality of planned steps was not performed during the test;

compare the configuration for the first test environment and the configuration for the second test environment to determine whether the first test environment was configured according to the configuration for the second test environment;

present, on the display, a second chart that indicates whether the first test environment was configured according to the configuration for the second test environment;

determine, based on the result of the test, that the test resulted in a failure;

present, on the display, a third chart that indicates the failure; and

deploy an application corresponding to the test plan if each step of the plurality of planned steps was performed during the test, if the first test environment was configured according to the configuration for the second test environment, and if the failure was fixed.

16. The system of claim 15 , wherein the configuration for the second test environment specifies at least one of an operating system, a patch level, and a hardware specification.

17. The system of claim 15 , wherein the compliance management device is further configured to present, on the display, a fourth chart that indicates:

a plurality of tests; and

whether each test of the plurality of tests corresponds to an existing test plan.

18. The system of claim 15 , wherein:

the compliance management server is further configured to store a step that is not included in the test plan; and

the compliance management device is further configured to:

determine whether the step that is not included in the test plan should be included in the test plan; and

present, on the display, a fourth chart that indicates the step that is not included in the test plan if the step that is not included in the test plan should be included in the test plan.

19. The system of claim 15 , wherein:

the test verifies whether the application is compliant; and

the application is deployed in response to a determination that the each step of the plurality of planned steps was performed during the test and that the first test environment was configured according to the configuration for the second test environment.

20. The system of claim 15 , wherein the compliance management device is further configured to determine whether the failure has been repaired.

21. The system of claim 15 , wherein one or more of the first chart, the second chart, and the third chart further identifies a tester who performed the test.