IP Library Granted Patent US 9,782,227
Granted Patent B2
US 9,782,227 · App. 15/168,405 · Granted Oct 10, 2017

Preoperatively planning an arthroplasty procedure and generating a corresponding patient specific arthroplasty resection guide

Inventors: Ilwhan Park (Walnut Creek, CA); Venkata Surya Sarva (Fremont, CA); Irene Min Choi (Emeryville, CA)
Assignee: Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
A61B34/10A61B17/1764A61F2/389A61F2/3859A61F2/4657G06K9/2063G06K9/6202G06T19/00A61B6/505A61B2034/102A61B2034/105A61B2034/108A61F2002/4658A61F2002/4668G06K2209/055G06T2210/41Y10T29/49
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,782,227
App. No.
15/168,405
Granted
Oct 10, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of manufacturing an arthroplasty jig is disclosed herein. The method may include the following: generate two dimensional image data of a patient joint to undergo arthroplasty, identify in the two dimensional image data a first point corresponding to an articular surface of a bone forming the joint, identify a second point corresponding to an articular surface of an implant, identify a location of a resection plane when the first point is correlated with the second point, and create the arthroplasty jig with a resection guide located according to the identified location of the resection plane.

Claims (44)

1. A method of performing an arthroplasty procedure on a femur of a patient, the method comprising:

a) generating an operation plan of the arthroplasty procedure, the generating of the operation plan including:

i) displaying on a three dimensional computer model of the femur of the patient a first point at a most distal location on a condylar surface of the computer model of the femur of the patient and a second point at a location on the condylar surface of the computer model of the femur of the patient that is proximal the first point;

ii) using the first point and second point to position a three dimensional computer model of an implant relative to the three dimensional computer model of the femur of the patient, a position of the three dimensional computer model of the implant relative to the three dimensional computer model of the femur of the patient being reflective of the implant being implanted on the femur; and

iii) computer defining a resection of the femur in the computer model of the femur of the patient based on the position of the three dimensional computer model of the implant relative to the three dimensional computer model of the femur of the patient;

b) computer referencing the computer defined resection to a registration surface of the three dimensional computer model of the femur of the patient such that a position of the computer defined resection relative to the registration surface is reflective of a position of an actual resection to be made in the femur of the patient during the arthroplasty procedure and according to the operation plan.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the computer referencing includes matching movements relative to an origin in a computer coordinate system of a bone-only version of the three dimensional computer model of the femur and a bone and cartilage version of the three dimensional computer model of the femur.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the computer defining the resection of the femur occurs in relation to the bone-only version of the three dimensional computer model of the femur, and the registration surface of the three dimensional computer model is with respect to the bone and cartilage version of the three dimensional computer model.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising displaying on the three dimensional computer model of the implant a third point at a most distal location on a condylar surface of the computer model of the implant and a fourth point at a location on the condylar surface of the computer model of the implant proximal the third point, wherein using the first and second points to position the three dimensional computer model of the implant relative to the three dimensional computer model of the femur of the patient includes respectively positionally matching the first point with the third point and the second point with the fourth point.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the positionally matching occurs in two dimensions.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the positionally matching occurring in two dimensions includes projecting the first, second, third and fourth points to a sagittal plane of the three dimensional computer model of the femur of the patient and the three dimensional computer model of the implant.

7. The method of claim 4 , wherein the positionally matching employs iterative closest point matching.

8. The method of claim 4 , wherein the second point is at a most posterior location on the condylar surface of the computer model of the femur of the patient, and the fourth point is at a most posterior location on the condylar surface of the computer model of the implant.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the operation plan takes place preoperatively.

10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: c) contacting the femur at a location corresponding to the registration surface of the three dimensional computer model of the femur of the patient.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein step c) facilitates guidance of a cutting tool to resect the femur according to the operation plan.

12. The method of claim 10 , wherein step c) occurs subsequent to steps a) and b).

13. The method of claim 11 , wherein the contacting the femur is via a mating surface defined in an arthroplasty jig according to the registration surface of the three dimensional computer model of the femur, and the guidance of the cutting tool to resect the femur according to the operation plan is via a resection slot of the arthroplasty jig, the resection slot having been defined in the arthroplasty jig according to the computer defined resection.

14. The method of claim 11 , further comprising guiding the cutting tool to resect the femur according to the operation plan subsequent the femur being contacted at the location corresponding to the registration surface of the three dimensional computer model of the femur of the patient, the contact registering the computer defined resection with the femur.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the contacting the femur is via a mating surface defined in an arthroplasty jig according to the registration surface of the three dimensional computer model of the femur, and the guiding of the cutting tool to resect the femur according to the operation plan is via a resection slot of the arthroplasty jig, the resection slot having been defined in the arthroplasty jig according to the computer defined resection.

16. The method of claim 14 , wherein the second point is a most posterior location on the condylar surface of the computer model of the femur of the patient.

17. A method of performing an arthroplasty procedure on a femur of a patient, the method comprising:

a) generating an operative plan of the arthroplasty procedure, the generating of the operative plan including:

i) displaying on a three dimensional computer model of the femur of the patient a first point at a most distal location on a condylar surface of the computer model of the femur of the patient and a second point at a location on the condylar surface of the computer model of the femur of the patient that is proximal the first point;

ii) using the first point and second point to position a three dimensional computer model of an implant relative to the three dimensional computer model of the femur of the patient, a position of the three dimensional computer model of the implant relative to the three dimensional computer model of the femur of the patient being reflective of the implant being implanted on the femur; and

iii) computer defining a resection of the femur in the computer model of the femur of the patient based on the position of the three dimensional computer model of the implant relative to the three dimensional computer model of the femur of the patient;

b) computer referencing the computer defined resection to a registration surface of the three dimensional computer model of the femur of the patient such that a position of the computer defined resection relative to the registration surface is reflective of a position of an actual resection to be made in the femur of the patient during the arthroplasty procedure and according to the operative plan; and

c) guiding a cutting tool in resecting the femur according the operative plan subsequent the femur being contacted at a location corresponding to the registration surface of the three dimensional computer model of the femur of the patient, the contact registering the computer defined resection with the femur.

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein the contacting the femur is via a mating surface defined in an arthroplasty jig according to the registration surface of the three dimensional computer model of the femur, and the guiding of the cutting tool to resect the femur according to the operative plan is via a resection slot of the arthroplasty jig, the resection slot having been defined in the arthroplasty jig according to the computer defined resection.

19. The method of claim 17 , wherein the second point is a most posterior location on the condylar surface of the computer model of the femur of the patient.

20. The method of claim 17 , further comprising displaying on the three dimensional computer model of the implant a third point at a most distal location on a condylar surface of the computer model of the implant and a fourth point at a location on the condylar surface of the computer model of the implant proximal the third point, wherein using the first and second points to position the three dimensional computer model of the implant relative to the three dimensional computer model of the femur of the patient includes respectively positionally matching the first point with the third point and the second point with the fourth point.

21. The method of claim 20 , wherein the positionally matching occurs in two dimensions.

22. The method of claim 21 , wherein the positionally matching occurring in two dimensions includes projecting the first, second, third and fourth points to a sagittal plane of the three dimensional computer model of the femur of the patient and the three dimensional computer model of the implant.

23. The method of claim 20 , wherein the positionally matching employs iterative closest point matching.

24. The method of claim 20 , wherein the second point is at a most posterior location on the condylar surface of the computer model of the femur of the patient, and the fourth point is at a most posterior location on the condylar surface of the computer model of the implant.

25. The method of claim 17 , wherein the operative plan takes place preoperatively.

26. A method of performing an arthroplasty procedure on a femur of a patient, the arthroplasty procedure comprising an incision, a resection, and an implantation, the method comprising:

a) generating a surgical plan prior to the incision of the arthroplasty procedure, the generating the surgical plan including:

i) displaying on a three dimensional computer model of the femur of the patient a first point at a distal location on a condylar surface of the computer model of the femur of the patient and a second point at a location on the condylar surface of the computer model of the femur of the patient that is proximal the first point;

ii) using the first point and second point to position a three dimensional computer model of an implant relative to the three dimensional computer model of the femur of the patient, a position of the three dimensional computer model of the implant relative to the three dimensional computer model of the femur of the patient being reflective of the implant being positioned on the femur during the implantation of the arthroplasty procedure; and

iii) computer defining a virtual resection of the femur in the computer model of the femur of the patient based on the position of the three dimensional computer model of the implant relative to the three dimensional computer model of the femur of the patient;

b) subsequent to step a) and prior to the incision of the arthroplasty procedure, computer referencing the virtual resection to a registration surface of the three dimensional computer model of the femur of the patient such that a position of the virtual resection relative to the registration surface is reflective of a position of the resection of the arthroplasty procedure on the femur of the patient and according to the surgical plan; and

c) subsequent to step b) and subsequent to the incision of the arthroplasty procedure, guiding a cutting tool in performing the resection of the femur according the surgical plan subsequent the femur being contacted at a location corresponding to the registration surface of the three dimensional computer model of the femur of the patient, the contact registering the computer defined resection with the femur.

27. The method of claim 26 , wherein the distal location comprises a most distal location on a condylar surface of the computer model of the femur of the patient.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 31, 2016
From: PARK, ILWHAN; SARVA, VENKATA SURYA; CHOI, IRENE MIN
To: OTISMED CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 038748/0187 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 31, 2016
From: OTISMED CORPORATION
To: HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 038748/0230 →
Continuity (13)
Continuation In Part 14084255 · Nov 19, 2013
Continuation 13086275 · Apr 13, 2011
Continuation In Part 12760388 · Apr 14, 2010
Continuation In Part 12563809 · Sep 21, 2009
Continuation In Part 12546545 · Aug 24, 2009
Continuation In Part 12111924 · Apr 29, 2008
Continuation In Part 11959344
Continuation In Part 12505056 · Jul 17, 2009
Continuation In Part 12111924 · Apr 29, 2008
Continuation In Part 11959344 · Dec 18, 2007
Provisional Application 61102692 · Oct 3, 2008
Provisional Application 61083053 · Jul 23, 2008
Related Publication 20160270859A1 · Sep 22, 2016