IP Library Granted Patent US 9,798,313
Granted Patent B2
US 9,798,313 · App. 14/767,505 · Granted Oct 24, 2017

Method for controlling a device system having power tool and a motor-driven advancing mechanism

Inventors: Peter Brugger (Feldkirch, AT); Georg Studer (Thueringen, AT)
Assignee: Hilti Aktiengesellschaft
G05B19/402B23D59/002B28D1/045B28D7/005G05B2219/45144
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,798,313
App. No.
14/767,505
Granted
Oct 24, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for controlling a device system ( 10 ) having a saw blade ( 14 ) that is attached to a saw arm ( 15 ) and that can be moved along an advancing direction ( 26 ) by a motor-driven advancing mechanism ( 13 ), whereby there is an infeed motion of the saw arm ( 15 ) with the saw blade ( 14 ) into the workpiece ( 18 ) and, during the infeed motion of the saw arm ( 15 ) into the workpiece ( 18 ), a control unit ( 27 ) calculates an arc length (φ) of the saw blade ( 14 ) that is engaged with the workpiece ( 18 ), and the calculated arc length (φ) is compared to a pre-set, critical arc length (φ crit ) of the saw blade ( 14 ).

Claims (10)

1. A method for controlling a device system having a saw blade attached to a saw arm, the saw blade movable along an advancing direction by a motor-driven advancer, the method comprising:

calculating, via a controller during an infeed motion of the saw arm with the saw blade into the workpiece, an arc length of the saw blade engaged with the workpiece; and

comparing the calculated arc length to a pre-set, critical arc length of the saw blade.

2. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the infeed motion of the saw arm is interrupted and the saw blade undergoes an advancing movement in a forward direction along the advancing direction when the calculated arc length matches the critical arc length of the saw blade.

3. The method as recited in claim 2 wherein the controller calculates a movement of the saw blade in the forward direction during the advancing movement of the saw blade, and the calculated movement is compared to a pre-set, first movement.

4. The method as recited in claim 3 wherein the advancing movement of the saw blade is interrupted and further comprising providing an additional infeed motion of the saw arm into the workpiece when the calculated movement of the saw blade matches the first movement.

5. The method as recited in claim 4 wherein, during the further infeed motion of the saw arm, the controller calculates a further arc length of the saw blade engaged with the workpiece, and the further calculated arc length of the saw blade is compared to a further critical arc length.

6. The method as recited in claim 5 wherein the additional infeed motion of the saw arm is interrupted and further comprising providing a further advancing movement of the saw blade along the advancing direction in a backward direction opposite from the forward direction when the further calculated arc length matches the further critical arc length of the saw blade.

7. The method as recited in claim 6 wherein, during the further advancing movement of the saw blade, the control unit calculates a further movement of the saw blade in the backward direction, and the calculated further movement is compared to a pre-set, second movement.

8. The method as recited in claim 7 wherein the further advancing movement of the saw blade is interrupted when the further calculated movement of the saw blade matches the second movement.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 18, 2017
From: BRUGGER, PETER; STUDER, GEORG
To: HILTI AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
Reel/Frame 043036/0470 →
Priority Claims (1)
DE 10 2013 202 442 · Feb 14, 2013 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20150370241A1 · Dec 24, 2015