IP Library Granted Patent US 9,803,475
Granted Patent B2
US 9,803,475 · App. 14/249,052 · Granted Oct 31, 2017

System and method for integrated wellbore stress, stability and strengthening analyses

Inventors: Mojtaba P. Shahri (Houston, TX); Mohammadreza Safariforoshani (Houston, TX); Ovunc Mutlu (Houston, TX); Trevor Oar (Calgary, CA); Mojtaba Karimi (Houston, TX)
Assignee: Weatherford Technology Holdings, LLC
E21B49/006E21B21/003E21B49/003
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,803,475
App. No.
14/249,052
Granted
Oct 31, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods for an integrated wellbore stress, stability and strengthening analysis are disclosed. An integrated geomechanical tool can be used to analyze and evaluate stress along the length of the wellbore to identify a safe drilling mud weight window and help identify troublesome zones in the wellbore. Fracture length may then be predicted in the identified troublesome zones by using a stress tensor calculated during the stress analysis. The calculated fracture length may be used to perform a strengthening analysis. After performing strengthening analysis, mud loss may be predicted based on predicted fracture size calculated during the stress, stability and strengthening analyzes.

Claims (59)

1. A method implemented with one or more processors and a drilling system, the method comprising:

receiving, at the one or more processors, a plurality of input parameters, each input parameter relating to at least one of a wellbore, a formation in which the wellbore is drilled, and a drilling operation used to drill the wellbore with the drilling system;

generating, with the one or more processors, a geomechanical model of the wellbore based on one or more of the received input parameters;

identifying, with the one or more processors, one or more troublesome zones of the wellbore by performing a stress and stability analysis for the wellbore using the generated model based on one or more of the received input parameters to produce one or more stress and stability analysis output parameters;

performing, with the one or more processors, a strengthening analysis for the wellbore using the generated model based on one or more of the received input parameters and one or more of the stress and stability analysis output parameters to produce one or more strengthening analysis output parameters;

performing, with the one or more processors, a mud loss analysis for the wellbore using the generated model based on one or more of the received input parameters and one or more of the strengthening analysis output parameters to produce one or more mud loss analysis output parameters; and

drilling the wellbore in the formation with the drilling operation by operating the drilling system using the one or more strengthening analysis output parameters and the one or more mud loss analysis output parameters to strengthen the one or more identified troublesome zones during drilling.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein drilling the wellbore by operating the drilling system comprises drilling the wellbore with a drill string and a drill bit; circulating drilling fluid through the drill string and the drill bit; and mitigating loss of the drilling fluid by performing wellbore strengthening.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein performing the wellbore strengthening comprises sealing one or more existing natural fractures and/or induced fractures with a lost circulation material.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein sealing the one or more fractures comprises determining a dimension of a fracture at a wellbore location and selecting the lost circulation material having a suitable particle size distribution to seal the fracture at the wellbore location.

5. The method of claim 2 , wherein performing the wellbore strengthening comprises increasing a fracture gradient at a wellbore location; inducing a fracture at the wellbore location with the increased fracture gradient; and sealing the induced fracture.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein inducing the fracture at the wellbore location with the increased fracture gradient comprises exerting pressure of mud weight that exceeds the fracture gradient at the wellbore location and controlling a size of the induced fracture and an increase in the fracture gradient based on a determined amount of mud weight and/or a type of lost circulation material used at the wellbore location.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the stress and stability analysis comprises a simple stress and stability analysis and an advanced stress and stability analysis.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more of the received input parameters used for the stress and stability analysis comprise one or more of temperature parameters, temperature parameters that are time dependent, and mud cake effects.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more stress and stability analysis output parameters comprise one or more of a safe mud weight window and a fracture length.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more strengthening analysis output parameters comprise one or more of a fracture width distribution and a fracture re-initiation pressure.

11. The method of claim 1 , further comprising updating a mud weight window for the wellbore based on one or more of the strengthening analysis output parameters.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more mud loss analysis output parameters provide information about one or more of loss of fluid in a natural fracture, loss of fluid in the formation, and loss of fluid in an induced fracture.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein each of the stress and stability, strengthening and mud loss analysis can be run separately or in multiple combinations.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein drilling the wellbore comprises measuring one or more stress and stability output parameters; and performing a calibration procedure by comparing at least one of the one or more stress and stability analysis output parameters to the one or more measured stress and stability analysis parameters to calculate a difference between the at least one of the one or more stress and stability analysis output parameters and the one or more measured stress and stability analysis parameters, and using the calculated difference for calibration purposes of the stress and stability analysis.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein drilling the wellbore comprises measuring one or more strengthening analysis parameters; and performing a calibration procedure by comparing at least one of the one or more strengthening analysis output parameters to the one or more measured strengthening analysis parameters to calculate a difference between the at least one of the one or more strengthening analysis output parameters and the one or more measured strengthening analysis parameters, and using the calculated difference for calibration purposes of the strengthening analysis.

16. The method of claim 1 , wherein receiving the input parameters comprises obtaining the one or more input parameters in one or more of a well log, a leak-off test, a mini-fracture test, real-time information for the wellbore being drilled, pre-drilled information from another wellbore, and an assumed value based on available information.

17. The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the geomechanical model of the wellbore comprises incorporating a transient thermo-poro-elastic algorithm that takes into account wellbore temperature and/or mudcake effects.

18. The method of claim 1 , wherein performing the strengthening analysis for the wellbore comprises simulating a plurality of wellbore strengthening scenarios having one or more of fracture widths, fracture lengths, and lost circulation materials that are different.

19. A drilling system for drilling a wellbore in a formation with a drilling operation, the drilling system comprising:

a memory;

a display device; and

a processor operatively coupled to the memory and the display device and adapted to execute program code stored in the memory to:

receive a plurality of input parameters, each input parameter relating to at least one of the wellbore, the formation, and the drilling operation;

generate a geomechanical model of the wellbore based on one or more of the received input parameters;

perform a stress and stability analysis for the wellbore using the generated model based on one or more of the received input parameters to produce one or more stress and stability analysis output parameters;

identify one or more troublesome zones of the wellbore based on the stress and stability analysis;

perform a strengthening analysis for the wellbore using the generated model based on one or more of the received input parameters and one or more of the stress and stability analysis output parameters to produce one or more strengthening analysis output parameters; and

perform a mud loss analysis for the wellbore based using the generated model on one or more of the received input parameters and one or more of the strengthening analysis output parameters to produce one or more mud loss analysis output parameters; and

operate the drilling system using the one or more strengthening analysis output parameters and the one or more mud loss analysis output parameters to strengthen the one or more identified troublesome zones during drilling of the wellbore in the formation with the drilling operation.

20. The system of claim 19 , wherein the one or more mud loss analysis output parameters provide information about one or more of loss of fluid in a natural fracture, loss of fluid in the formation, and loss of fluid in an induced fracture.

21. The system of claim 20 , wherein each of the stress and stability, strengthening and mud loss analysis can be run separately or in multiple combinations.

22. The system of claim 19 , wherein the stress and stability analysis comprises a simple stress and stability analysis and an advanced stress and stability analysis.

23. The system of claim 19 , wherein the one or more of the received input parameters used for the stress and stability analysis comprise one or more of temperature parameters, temperature parameters that are time dependent, and mud cake effects.

24. The system of claim 19 , wherein the one or more stress and stability analysis output parameters comprise one or more of a safe mud weight window and a fracture length.

25. The system of claim 19 , wherein the one or more strengthening analysis output parameters comprise one or more of a fracture width distribution and a fracture re-initiation pressure.

26. The system of claim 19 , wherein the processor is further adapted to execute program code stored in the memory to update mud weight window for the wellbore based on one or more of the strengthening analysis output parameters.

27. The system of claim 19 , wherein the processor is further adapted to execute program code stored in the memory to perform a calibration procedure by comparing at least one of the one or more stress and stability analysis output parameters to one or more measured stress and stability analysis parameters to calculate a difference between the at least one of the one or more stress and stability analysis output parameters and the one or more measured stress and stability analysis parameters, and use the calculated difference for calibration purposes.

28. The system of claim 19 , wherein the processor is further adapted to execute program code stored in the memory to perform a calibration procedure by comparing at least one of the one or more strengthening analysis output parameters to one or more measured strengthening analysis parameters to calculate a difference between the at least one of the one or more strengthening analysis output parameters and the one or more measured strengthening analysis parameters, and use the calculated difference for calibration purposes.

29. A non-transitory program storage device, readable by a processor and comprising instructions stored thereon to cause one or more processors to:

receive a plurality of input parameters, each input parameter relating to at least one of a wellbore, a formation in which the wellbore is drilled, and a drilling operation used to drill the wellbore with a drilling system;

generate a geomechanical model of the wellbore based on one or more of the received input parameters;

perform a stress and stability analysis for the wellbore using the generated model based on one or more of the received input parameters to produce one or more stress and stability analysis output parameters;

identify one or more troublesome zones of the wellbore based on the stress and stability analysis;

perform a strengthening analysis for the wellbore using the generated model based on one or more of the received input parameters and one or more of the stress and stability analysis output parameters to produce one or more strengthening analysis output parameters; and

perform a mud loss analysis for the wellbore using the generated model based on one or more of the received input parameters and one or more of the strengthening analysis output parameters to produce one or more mud loss analysis output parameters; and

operate the drilling system using the one or more strengthening analysis output parameters and the one or more mud loss analysis output parameters to strengthen the one or more identified troublesome zones during drilling of the wellbore in the formation with the drilling operation.

30. The non-transitory program storage device of claim 29 , wherein the stress and stability analysis comprises a simple stress and stability analysis and an advanced stress and stability analysis.

31. The non-transitory program storage device of claim 29 , wherein the one or more of the received input parameters used for the stress and stability analysis comprise one or more of temperature parameters, temperature parameters that are time-dependent, and mudcake effects.

32. The non-transitory program storage device of claim 29 , wherein the one or more stress and stability analysis output parameters comprise one or more of a safe mud weight window and a fracture length.

33. The non-transitory program storage device of claim 29 , wherein the one or more strengthening analysis output parameters comprise one or more of a fracture width distribution and a fracture re-initiation pressure.

34. The non-transitory program storage device of claim 29 , wherein the instructions stored further cause the one or more processors to update a mud weight window for the wellbore based on one or more of the strengthening analysis output parameters.

35. The non-transitory program storage device of claim 29 , wherein the one or more mud loss analysis output parameters provide information about one or more of loss of fluid in a natural fracture, loss of fluid in the formation, and loss of fluid in an induced fracture.

36. The non-transitory program storage device of claim 29 , wherein each of the stress and stability, strengthening and mud loss analysis can be run separately or in multiple combinations.

Assignments (9)
PATENT SECURITY INTEREST ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 26, 2023
From: DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 063470/0629 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 1, 2021
From: WEATHERFORD TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC; WEATHERFORD NETHERLANDS B.V.; WEATHERFORD NORGE AS; HIGH PRESSURE INTEGRITY, INC.; PRECISION ENERGY SERVICES, INC.; WEATHERFORD CANADA LTD.; WEATHERFORD SWITZERLAND TRADING AND DEVELOPMENT GMBH; WEATHERFORD U.K. LIMITED
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 057683/0706 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 1, 2021
From: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: WEATHERFORD TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC; WEATHERFORD NETHERLANDS B.V.; WEATHERFORD NORGE AS; HIGH PRESSURE INTEGRITY, INC.; PRECISION ENERGY SERVICES, INC.; WEATHERFORD CANADA LTD; WEATHERFORD SWITZERLAND TRADING AND DEVELOPMENT GMBH; PRECISION ENERGY SERVICES ULC; WEATHERFORD U.K. LIMITED
Reel/Frame 057683/0423 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 28, 2020
From: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: WEATHERFORD TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC; WEATHERFORD NETHERLANDS B.V.; WEATHERFORD NORGE AS; HIGH PRESSURE INTEGRITY, INC.; PRECISION ENERGY SERVICES, INC.; WEATHERFORD CANADA LTD.; WEATHERFORD SWITZERLAND TRADING AND DEVELOPMENT GMBH; PRECISION ENERGY SERVICES ULC; WEATHERFORD U.K. LIMITED
Reel/Frame 053838/0323 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 28, 2020
From: WEATHERFORD TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC; WEATHERFORD NETHERLANDS B.V.; WEATHERFORD NORGE AS; HIGH PRESSURE INTEGRITY, INC.; PRECISION ENERGY SERVICES, INC.; WEATHERFORD CANADA LTD.; WEATHERFORD SWITZERLAND TRADING AND DEVELOPMENT GMBH; PRECISION ENERGY SERVICES ULC; WEATHERFORD U.K. LIMITED
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 054288/0302 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 26, 2019
From: WEATHERFORD TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC; WEATHERFORD NETHERLANDS B.V.; WEATHERFORD NORGE AS; HIGH PRESSURE INTEGRITY, INC.; PRECISION ENERGY SERVICES, INC.; WEATHERFORD CANADA LTD.; WEATHERFORD SWITZERLAND TRADING AND DEVELOPMENT GMBH; PRECISION ENERGY SERVICES ULC; WEATHERFORD U.K. LIMITED
To: DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 051419/0140 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 18, 2019
From: WEATHERFORD TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS LLC; WEATHERFORD NETHERLANDS B.V.; WEATHERFORD NORGE AS; HIGH PRESSURE INTEGRITY INC.; PRECISION ENERGY SERVICES INC.; WEATHERFORD CANADA LTD.; WEATHERFORD SWITZERLAND TRADING AND DEVELOPMENT GMBH; PRECISION ENERGY SERVICES ULC; WEATHERFORD U.K. LIMITED
To: WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 051891/0089 →
NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT Recorded Dec 23, 2016
From: WEATHERFORD/LAMB, INC.
To: WEATHERFORD TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC
Reel/Frame 040761/0610 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 15, 2014
From: SHAHRI, MOJTABA; SAFARI, REZA; OAR, TREVOR; KARIMI, MOJTABA; MUTLU, OVUNC
To: WEATHERFORD/LAMB, INC.
Reel/Frame 032906/0303 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20150292323A1 · Oct 15, 2015