IP Library Granted Patent US 9,835,021
Granted Patent B2
US 9,835,021 · App. 15/028,625 · Granted Dec 5, 2017

Ratio-based mode switching for optimizing weight-on-bit

Inventors: Robello Samuel (Cypress, TX); Aniket (Houston, TX); Gustavo A. Urdaneta (Houston, TX)
Assignee: LANDMARK GRAPHICS CORPORATION
E21B44/02E21B21/08E21B41/0092E21B44/04E21B45/00E21B47/024E21B47/08E21B47/12E21B47/16E21B47/18
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,835,021
App. No.
15/028,625
Granted
Dec 5, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

Drilling system and methods may employ a weight-on-bit optimization for an existing drilling mode and, upon transitioning to a different drilling mode, determine an initial weight-on-bit within a range derived from: a sinusoidal buckling ratio, a helical buckling ratio, and the weight-on-bit value for the prior drilling mode. The sinusoidal buckling ratio is the ratio of a minimum weight-on-bit to induce sinusoidal buckling in a sliding mode to a minimum weight-on-bit to induce sinusoidal buckling in a rotating mode, and the helical buckling ratio is the ratio of a minimum weight-on-bit to induce helical buckling in the sliding mode to a minimum weight-on-bit to induce helical buckling in the rotating mode. The ratios are a function of the length of the drill string and hence vary with the position of the drill bit along the borehole.

Claims (45)

1. A drilling method that comprises:

operating a drill string drilling operation in a first drilling mode that applies a first weight-on-bit;

detecting a prospective drilling mode transition from the first drilling mode to a second drilling mode;

upon said detecting the prospective drilling mode transition,

determining a sinusoidal buckling ratio between a minimum weight-on-bit to induce sinusoidal buckling in sliding mode and a minimum weight-on-bit to induce sinusoidal buckling in rotating mode; and

determining a helical buckling ratio between a minimum weight-on-bit to induce helical buckling in sliding mode and a minimum weight-on-bit to induce helical buckling in rotating mode;

determining a weight-on-bit operating range that comprises a range of buckling ratios between the determined sinusoidal buckling ratio and helical buckling ratio; and

transitioning from the first drilling mode to the second drilling mode, wherein said transitioning includes transitioning from the first weight-on-bit to a second weight-on-bit that is determined in accordance with the ratio between the second weight-on-bit and the first weight-on-bit being within the weight-on-bit operating range.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein one of the first and second drilling modes is a sliding mode and the other of the first and second drilling modes is a rotating mode.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

dynamically adapting the second weight-on-bit to maximize a rate of penetration.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the sinusoidal buckling ratio and helical buckling ratio each vary with position along a borehole.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining a sinusoidal buckling ration and a helical buckling ratio comprises determining a sinusoidal ratio and a helical buckling ratio for a current position of a drill bit on the drill string.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein said determining a weight-on-bit operating range further includes determining the weight-on-bit operating range based, at least in part, on the first weight-on-bit.

7. The method of claim 6 , further comprising determining the first weight-on-bit dynamically for ongoing drilling operations.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein said determining a sinusoidal buckling ratio comprises determining a ratio of a minimum weight-on-bit to induce sinusoidal buckling in sliding mode to a minimum weight-on-bit to induce sinusoidal buckling in rotating mode, and wherein determining a helical buckling ratio comprises determining a ratio of a minimum weight-on-bit to induce helical buckling in sliding mode to a minimum weight-on-bit to induce helical buckling in rotating mode.

9. A drilling system that comprises:

a processor; and

a machine-readable medium having program code executable by the processor to cause the drilling system to:

operate a drill string drilling operation in a first drilling mode that applies a first weight-on-bit;

detect a prospective drilling mode transition from the first drilling mode to a second drilling mode;

upon said detecting the prospective drilling mode transition,

determine a sinusoidal buckling ratio between a minimum weight-on-bit to induce sinusoidal buckling in sliding mode and a minimum weight-on-bit to induce sinusoidal buckling in rotating mode; and

determine a helical buckling ratio between a minimum weight-on-bit to induce helical buckling in sliding mode and a minimum weight-on-bit to induce helical buckling in rotating mode;

determine a weight-on-bit operating range that comprises a range of buckling ratios between the determined sinusoidal buckling ratio and helical buckling ratio; and

transition from the first drilling mode to the second drilling mode, wherein said transitioning includes transitioning from the first weight-on-bit to a second weight-on-bit that is determined in accordance with the ratio between the second weight-on-bit and the first weight-on-bit being within the weight-on-bit operating range.

10. The drilling system of claim 9 , wherein one of the first and second drilling modes is a sliding mode and the other of the first and second drilling modes is a rotating mode.

11. The drilling system of claim 9 , wherein the first weight- on-bit maximizes a rate of penetration for the first drilling mode.

12. The drilling system of claim 9 , wherein said determining the sinusoidal buckling ratio and the helical buckling ratio comprises determining the sinusoidal buckling ration and the helical buckling ratio for multiple points along a borehole trajectory.

13. The system of claim 9 , wherein determining a sinusoidal buckling ration and a helical buckling ratio comprises determining a sinusoidal ratio and a helical buckling ratio for a current position of a drill bit on the drill string.

14. The system of claim 9 , wherein said determining a weight-on-bit operating range further includes determining the weight-on-bit operating range based, at least in part, on the first weight-on-bit.

15. The system of claim 9 , wherein said determining a sinusoidal buckling ratio comprises determining a ratio of a minimum weight-on-bit to induce sinusoidal buckling in sliding mode to a minimum weight-on-bit to induce sinusoidal buckling in rotating mode, and wherein determining a helical buckling ratio comprises determining a ratio of a minimum weight-on-bit to induce helical buckling in sliding mode to a minimum weight-on-bit to induce helical buckling in rotating mode.

16. A non-transitory computer readable medium comprising computer executable instructions for optimizing weight-on-bit for a drilling operation, wherein execution of the computer executable instructions causes one or more machines to perform operations comprising:

operating a drill string drilling operation in a first drilling mode that applies a first weight-on-bit;

detecting a prospective drilling mode transition from the first drilling mode to a second drilling mode;

upon said detecting the prospective drilling mode transition,

determining a sinusoidal buckling ratio between a minimum weight-on-bit to induce sinusoidal buckling in sliding mode and a minimum weight-on-bit to induce sinusoidal buckling in rotating mode; and

determining a helical buckling ratio between a minimum weight-on-bit to induce helical buckling in sliding mode and a minimum weight-on-bit to induce helical buckling in rotating mode;

determining a weight-on-bit operating range based, at least in part, on the determined sinusoidal buckling ratio and helical buckling ratio; and

transitioning from the first drilling mode to the second drilling mode, wherein said transitioning includes transitioning from the first weight-on-bit to a second weight-on-bit that is determined in accordance with the ratio between the second weight-on-bit and the first weight-on-bit being within the weight-on-bit operating range.

17. The medium of claim 16 , wherein the first weight-on-bit maximizes a rate of penetration for the first drilling mode.

18. The medium of claim 16 , further comprising:

dynamically adapting the second weight-on-bit to maximize a rate of penetration.

19. The medium of claim 16 , wherein said determining a weight-on-bit operating range further includes determining the weight-on-bit operating range based, at least in part, on the first weight-on-bit.

20. The medium of claim 19 , further comprising determining the first weight-on-bit dynamically for ongoing drilling operations.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 11, 2016
From: SAMUEL, ROBELLO; ANIKET, .; URDANETA, GUSTAVO A.
To: LANDMARK GRAPHICS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 038247/0679 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20160251953A1 · Sep 1, 2016