IP Library Granted Patent US 9,946,621
Granted Patent B2
US 9,946,621 · App. 13/620,785 · Granted Apr 17, 2018

Prevention of event flooding

Inventors: Ann Eleanor Collins (Salisbury, GB); Jenny Jing He (Winchester, GB); Anthony Philip Papageorgiou (Southampton, GB); Andrew Dean Wharmby (Romsey, GB)
Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
G06F11/3006G06F11/3072H04L41/147H04L43/0817H04L43/16
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,946,621
App. No.
13/620,785
Granted
Apr 17, 2018
Kind
B2
Abstract

Techniques for preventing event flooding in an event processing system, comprising: responsive to receiving, by an analysis component, monitored activity data, an analysis component for analyzing the monitored activity data, to determine a potential event; responsive to determining a potential event, an analysis component identifying a set of threshold values and determining whether the potential event has met a threshold value of the set of threshold values; responsive to a positive determination, an analysis component for determining if the met threshold value is an identical threshold value met by a previous potential event; and responsive to a second positive determination, a disregard component for disregarding the potential event.

Claims (11)

1. A method for preventing event flooding in an event processing system, the method comprising:

responsive to receiving monitored activity data, analysing, by a plurality of processors, the monitored activity data, to identify an event;

responsive to identifying the event, identifying, by the plurality of processors, a set of threshold values and determining whether the event has met a threshold value of the set of threshold values;

responsive to determining that the event has met the threshold value, determining, by the plurality of processors, if the met threshold value, is an identical threshold value met by a previous event; and

responsive to determining that the met threshold value is an identical threshold value met by the previous event, disregarding, by the plurality of processors, the event.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein, responsive to determining that the met threshold value is not an identical threshold value met by a previously event, communicating the event, to a filtering component, for determining whether the event is an event which is to be communicated to an event consumer.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein an event is a number of changing activities over a time period.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein an event is a number of active transactions for a determined time period.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of threshold values comprise an ascending set of numerical threshold values for an event which is identified as ascending a numerical measurement scale.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of threshold values comprise a descending set of numerical threshold value for events which are identified as descending a numerical measurement scale.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the set of threshold values is a scalar numerical measurement scale.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 15, 2012
From: COLLINS, ANN E.; HE, JENNY J.; PAPAGEORGIOU, ANTHONY P.; WHARMBY, ANDREW D.
To: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 028965/0751 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 11161150 · Apr 5, 2011 · regional
Continuity (2)
Continuation 13439714 · Apr 4, 2012
Related Publication 20130019244A1 · Jan 17, 2013