Real time failure analysis and accurate warranty claim assesment

1. A method for failure analysis and warranty claim assessment, the method comprises:

sensing sensed vehicle parameters by multiple vehicle sensors that comprise multiple types of sensors;

calculating, by a vehicle monitor, based on the sensed vehicle parameters, parameters of multiple vehicle components; wherein the vehicle monitor is mechanically coupled to a vehicle or installed in the vehicle;

determining, by the vehicle monitor and based on the parameters of the multiple vehicle components, whether the operation of the vehicle exceeds a warrantable operation of the vehicle; and

evaluating, by the vehicle monitor and based on the parameters of the multiple vehicle components and by the vehicle monitor, whether a vehicle failure resulted from an operation of the vehicle that exceeds the warrantable operation of the vehicle or will result from the operation of the vehicle that exceeds the warrantable operation of the vehicle.

2. The method according to claim 1 wherein the sensed vehicle parameters are duty related parameters and wherein the method comprises determining an actual wear of the vehicle, by the vehicle monitor and based on the parameters of multiple vehicle components.

3. The method according to claim 1 comprising generating, by the vehicle monitor and in real time, an alert about the vehicle failure.

4. The method according to claim 1 comprising generating by the vehicle monitor and in real time, an alert about an expected vehicle failure before the vehicle failure occurs.

5. The method according to claim 1 comprising instructing the vehicle, by the vehicle monitor, to change a vehicle parameter if the vehicle monitor determines that a vehicle failure occurs or if a vehicle failure is impeding.

6. The method according to claim 1 wherein the vehicle failure is a vehicle system failure and wherein the method comprises informing, by the vehicle monitor, a vehicle controller that is responsible to the vehicle system about the vehicle system failure.

7. The method according to claim 1 wherein the evaluating comprises searching for a correlation between the vehicle failure and a pattern of a usage of the vehicle.

8. The method according to claim 1 comprising generating by the vehicle monitor a report about an outcome of the determining and an outcome of the evaluating.

9. The method according to claim 8 comprising:

transmitting, by a vehicle transmitter, the report; and

receiving the report a remote computer; and

determining, by the remote computer a new warranty model.

10. The method according to claim 8 wherein a size of the report is less than one thousandth of an aggregate size of the sensed vehicle parameters.

11. The method according to claim 8 wherein a size of the report is less than one millionth of an aggregate size of the sensed vehicle parameters.

12. A computer program product that is non-transitory and stores instructions that once executed by a vehicle monitor causes the vehicle monitor to perform the steps of:

receiving sensed vehicle parameters that are sensed by multiple vehicle sensors that comprise multiple types of sensors;

calculating, based on the sensed vehicle parameters, parameters of multiple vehicle components; wherein the vehicle monitor is mechanically coupled to a vehicle or installed in the vehicle;

determining, based on the parameters of the multiple vehicle components, whether the operation of the vehicle exceeds a warrantable operation of the vehicle; and

evaluating, based on the parameters of the multiple vehicle components and by the vehicle monitor, whether a vehicle failure resulted from an operation of the vehicle that exceeds the warrantable operation of the vehicle or will result from the operation of the vehicle that exceeds the warrantable operation of the vehicle.

13. The computer program product according to claim 12 wherein the sensed vehicle parameters are duty related parameters and wherein the computer program product stores instructions for determining an actual wear of the vehicle, by the vehicle monitor and based on the parameters of multiple vehicle components.

14. The computer program product according to claim 12 that stores instructions for generating, by the vehicle monitor and in real time, an alert about the vehicle failure.

15. The computer program product according to claim 12 that stores instructions for generating by the vehicle monitor and in real time, an alert about an expected vehicle failure before the vehicle failure occurs.

16. The computer program product according to claim 12 that stores instructions for instructing the vehicle, by the vehicle monitor, to change a vehicle parameter if the vehicle monitor determines that a vehicle failure occurs or if a vehicle failure is impeding.

17. The computer program product according to claim 12 wherein the vehicle failure is a vehicle system failure and wherein the computer program product stores instructions for informing a vehicle controller that is responsible to the vehicle system about the vehicle system failure.

18. The computer program product according to claim 12 wherein the computer program product stores instructions for searching for a correlation between the vehicle failure and a pattern of a usage of the vehicle.

19. The computer program product according to claim 12 that stores instructions for generating a report about an outcome of the determining and an outcome of the evaluating.

20. The computer program product according to claim 19 stores instructions for determining a new warranty model.