IP Library Granted Patent US 10,132,147
Granted Patent B2
US 10,132,147 · App. 14/322,516 · Granted Nov 20, 2018

System and method for modeling and design of pulse fracturing networks

Inventors: Mohammadreza Safariforoshani (Houston, TX); Jian Huang (Houston, TX); Sunil Lakshminarayanan (Houston, TX); Ovunc Mutlu (Houston, TX)
Assignee: Weatherford Technology Holdings, LLC
E21B43/26
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,132,147
App. No.
14/322,516
Granted
Nov 20, 2018
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods for analyzing and designing a customized pulse fracturing operation for fracturing a wellbore in a reservoir formation are disclosed. Pulsed fracturing can create multiple fractures that radiate away from the wellbore while minimizing near wellbore damage. This network can further be extended into the reservoir by utilizing an optimized pumping rate over a predetermined amount of time. The optimized pulse rate and duration can be determined by using a geomechanical and a reservoir simulator which can help in quantifying the production efficiency of the induced fracture network.

Claims (54)

1. A non-transitory program storage device, readable by a processor and comprising instructions stored thereon to cause one or more processors to:

receive a plurality of input parameters, each input parameter relating to a wellbore in a reservoir formation;

characterize a portion of the reservoir formation to be fractured in a range of brittle, ductile and a brittle-ductile transition, based on the received input parameters;

develop a rate and pressure dependent failure model predicting failure for at least the characterized portion based on the received input parameters;

simulate propagation of a pulse fracturing network in the reservoir formation to determine one or more pulse fracturing rates and loads triggering ductile-to-brittle transition to the characterized portion in the rate and pressure dependent failure model to maximize fracture network extent while minimizing near wellbore damage;

create a customized pulse fracturing operation based on the one or more pulse fracturing rates and loads determined from the simulation; and

perform the customized pulse fracturing operation using the one or more pulse fracturing rates and loads on the portion of the reservoir formation.

2. The non-transitory program storage device of claim 1 , wherein the failure model comprises predicting rate and pressure dependent failure surfaces.

3. The non-transitory program storage device of claim 1 , wherein the failure model comprises predicting tensile failure.

4. The non-transitory program storage device of claim 1 , wherein the failure model comprises predicting compactive failure.

5. The non-transitory program storage device of claim 1 , wherein the failure model comprises predicting shear failure.

6. The non-transitory program storage device of claim 1 , wherein the customized pulse fracturing operation comprises pulse load with a customized pulse rise period using formation specific material properties and rate and pressure dependent failure surfaces.

7. The non-transitory program storage device of claim 1 , wherein the customized pulse fracturing operation comprises pulse load with a customized pulse peak using formation specific material properties and rate and pressure dependent failure surfaces.

8. The non-transitory program storage device of claim 1 , wherein the customized fracturing operation comprises pulse load with a customized number of pulse cycles using formation specific properties and rate and pressure dependent failure surfaces.

9. The non-transitory program storage device of claim 1 , wherein the input parameters comprise at least one of Young's Modulus, Poisson's ratio, porous rock density, rock gain density, unconfined compressive strength, cohesion, internal friction angle, formation anisotropy, and natural fracture characteristics.

10. The non-transitory program storage device of claim 1 , wherein the instructions further cause the one or more processors to predict a fracture potential of a reservoir formation under pulse fracturing application.

11. The non-transitory program storage device of claim 1 , wherein the input parameters are ranked and weighted.

12. A method implemented with a processing system for performing a pulse fracturing operation with at least one pulse source, the method comprising:

receiving, with the processing system, a plurality of input parameters, each input parameter relating to a wellbore in a reservoir formation;

characterizing, with the processing system, a portion of the reservoir formation to be fractured in a range of brittle, ductile and a brittle-ductile transition, based on the received input parameters;

developing, with the processing system, a rate and pressure dependent failure model predicting failure for at least the characterized portion based on the received input parameters;

simulating, with the processing system, propagation of a pulse fracturing network in the reservoir formation to determine one or more pulse fracturing rates and loads triggering ductile-to-brittle transition to the characterized portion in the rate and pressure dependent failure model to maximize fracture network extent while minimizing near wellbore damage;

creating, with the processing system, a customized pulse fracturing operation based on the one or more pulse fracturing rates and loads determined from the simulation; and

performing, with the processing system and the at least one pulse source, the customized pulse fracturing operation using the one or more pulse fracturing rates and loads on the one or more zones of the reservoir formation.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the failure model comprises predicting rate and pressure dependent failure surfaces.

14. The method of claim 12 , wherein the failure model comprises predicting tensile failure.

15. The method of claim 12 , wherein the failure model comprises predicting compactive failure.

16. The method of claim 12 , wherein the failure model comprises predicting shear failure.

17. The method of claim 12 , wherein the customized pulse fracturing operation comprises pulse load with a customized pulse rise period using formation specific properties and rate and pressure dependent failure surfaces.

18. The method of claim 12 , wherein the customized pulse fracturing operation comprises pulse load with a customized pulse peak using formation specific properties and rate and pressure dependent failure surfaces.

19. The method of claim 12 , wherein the customized pulse fracturing operation comprises pulse load with a customized number of pulse cycles using formation specific properties and rate and pressure dependent failure surfaces.

20. The method of claim 12 , wherein the input parameters comprise at least one of Young's Modulus, Poisson's ratio, porous rock density, rock gain density, unconfined compressive strength, cohesion, internal friction angle, formation anisotropy, and natural fracture characteristics.

21. The method of claim 12 , further comprising predicting a fracture potential of the wellbore under pulse fracturing application.

22. The method of claim 12 , wherein the input parameters are ranked and weighted.

23. A system, comprising:

a memory;

a display device; and

a processor operatively coupled to the memory and the display device and adapted to execute program code stored in the memory to:

receive a plurality of input parameters, each input parameter relating to a wellbore in a reservoir formation;

characterize a portion of the reservoir formation to be fractured in a range of brittle, ductile and a brittle-ductile transition, based on the received input parameters;

develop a rate and pressure dependent failure model predicting failure of at least the characterized portion based on the received input parameters;

simulate propagation of a pulse fracturing fracture network in the reservoir formation to determine one or more pulse fracturing rates and loads triggering ductile-to-brittle transition to the characterized portion in the rate and pressure dependent failure model to maximize fracture network extent while minimizing near wellbore damage;

create a customized pulse fracturing operation based on the one or more pulse fracturing rates and loads determined from the simulation; and

perform the customized pulse fracturing operation using the one or more pulse fracturing rates and loads on the wellbore.

24. The system of claim 23 , wherein the failure model comprises predicting rate and pressure dependent failure surfaces.

25. The system of claim 23 , wherein the failure model comprises predicting tensile failure.

26. The system of claim 23 , wherein the failure model comprises predicting compactive failure.

27. The system of claim 23 , wherein the failure model comprises predicting shear failure.

28. The system of claim 23 , wherein the customized pulse fracturing operation comprises pulse load with a customized pulse rise period using formation specific material properties and rate and pressure dependent failure surfaces.

29. The system of claim 23 , wherein the customized pulse fracturing operation comprises pulse load with a customized pulse peak using formation specific material properties and rate and pressure dependent failure surfaces.

30. The system of claim 23 , wherein the customized fracturing operation comprises pulse load with a customized number of pulse cycles using formation specific properties and rate and pressure dependent failure surfaces.

31. The system of claim 23 , wherein the input parameters comprise at least one of Young's Modulus, Poisson's ratio, porous rock density, rock gain density, unconfined compressive strength, cohesion, internal friction angle, formation anisotropy, and natural fracture characteristics.

32. The system of claim 23 , further comprising predicting a fracture potential of the wellbore under pulse fracturing application.

33. The system of claim 23 , wherein the input parameters are ranked and weighted.

Assignments (8)
PATENT SECURITY INTEREST ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 26, 2023
From: DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 063470/0629 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 1, 2021
From: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: WEATHERFORD TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC; WEATHERFORD NETHERLANDS B.V.; WEATHERFORD NORGE AS; HIGH PRESSURE INTEGRITY, INC.; PRECISION ENERGY SERVICES, INC.; WEATHERFORD CANADA LTD; WEATHERFORD SWITZERLAND TRADING AND DEVELOPMENT GMBH; PRECISION ENERGY SERVICES ULC; WEATHERFORD U.K. LIMITED
Reel/Frame 057683/0423 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 1, 2021
From: WEATHERFORD TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC; WEATHERFORD NETHERLANDS B.V.; WEATHERFORD NORGE AS; HIGH PRESSURE INTEGRITY, INC.; PRECISION ENERGY SERVICES, INC.; WEATHERFORD CANADA LTD.; WEATHERFORD SWITZERLAND TRADING AND DEVELOPMENT GMBH; WEATHERFORD U.K. LIMITED
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 057683/0706 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 28, 2020
From: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: WEATHERFORD TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC; WEATHERFORD NETHERLANDS B.V.; WEATHERFORD NORGE AS; HIGH PRESSURE INTEGRITY, INC.; PRECISION ENERGY SERVICES, INC.; WEATHERFORD CANADA LTD.; WEATHERFORD SWITZERLAND TRADING AND DEVELOPMENT GMBH; PRECISION ENERGY SERVICES ULC; WEATHERFORD U.K. LIMITED
Reel/Frame 053838/0323 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 28, 2020
From: WEATHERFORD TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC; WEATHERFORD NETHERLANDS B.V.; WEATHERFORD NORGE AS; HIGH PRESSURE INTEGRITY, INC.; PRECISION ENERGY SERVICES, INC.; WEATHERFORD CANADA LTD.; WEATHERFORD SWITZERLAND TRADING AND DEVELOPMENT GMBH; PRECISION ENERGY SERVICES ULC; WEATHERFORD U.K. LIMITED
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 054288/0302 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 26, 2019
From: WEATHERFORD TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC; WEATHERFORD NETHERLANDS B.V.; WEATHERFORD NORGE AS; HIGH PRESSURE INTEGRITY, INC.; PRECISION ENERGY SERVICES, INC.; WEATHERFORD CANADA LTD.; WEATHERFORD SWITZERLAND TRADING AND DEVELOPMENT GMBH; PRECISION ENERGY SERVICES ULC; WEATHERFORD U.K. LIMITED
To: DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 051419/0140 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 18, 2019
From: WEATHERFORD TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS LLC; WEATHERFORD NETHERLANDS B.V.; WEATHERFORD NORGE AS; HIGH PRESSURE INTEGRITY INC.; PRECISION ENERGY SERVICES INC.; WEATHERFORD CANADA LTD.; WEATHERFORD SWITZERLAND TRADING AND DEVELOPMENT GMBH; PRECISION ENERGY SERVICES ULC; WEATHERFORD U.K. LIMITED
To: WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 051891/0089 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 2, 2017
From: SAFARIFOROSHANI, MOHAMMADREZA; HUANG, JIAN; LAKSHMINARAYANAN, SUNIL; MUTLU, OVUNC
To: WEATHERFORD TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC
Reel/Frame 041446/0449 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20160003019A1 · Jan 7, 2016
Cited By (2)
US 12,276,186 US 12,669,046