IP Library Granted Patent US 10,225,534
Granted Patent B2
US 10,225,534 · App. 15/251,926 · Granted Mar 5, 2019

Device and method for characterization of subjective speckle formation

Inventors: Yanning Zhao (Monheim, DE); Frank Schliep (Leverkusen, DE)
Assignee: Visteon Global Technologies, Inc.
H04N9/3179G02B27/01G02B27/0101G02B27/48G06T5/002G06T5/40G06T7/60H04N9/3129H04N9/3155H04N9/3194G02B2027/012G02B2027/014G06T2207/30168
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,225,534
App. No.
15/251,926
Granted
Mar 5, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

The invention concerns a device for characterization of subjective speckle formation, especially for quantification of the speckle contrast. The device has a projection surface ( 9 ) and a coherent or partly coherent light source ( 10 ) for projecting of an image onto the projection surface ( 9 ), a detection unit ( 11 ) for generating of speckle images ( 13 ) of the image projected onto the projection surface ( 9 ), as well as a data acquisition and analysis unit ( 12 ) for processing and evaluation of image data.

Claims (30)

1. Method for characterization of subjective speckle formation, especially for quantification of the speckle contrast, wherein the method involves the following steps:

projecting of an image onto a projection surface by means of a coherent or partly coherent light source,

generating of speckle images of the projection surface with a detection unit, wherein exposure times (T) of the detection unit are changed in stepwise manner until an optimal exposure time (Topt), at which a speckle contrast (Cspeckle) is reduced to a maximum value,

generating of a plurality of speckle images with the optimal exposure time (Topt) and forming of an average speckle image,

generating of a plurality of images of the projection surface without projected image of the coherent or partly coherent light source with the optimal exposure time (Topt) and forming of an average dark image,

subtracting of the average dark image from the average speckle image for reduction of background illumination noise,

forming of an intensity histogram for analysis of the image quality.

2. Method according to claim 1 , characterized in that an aperture value (f) is adjusted in dependence on speckle sizes (D) occurring in the speckle image and pixel size (P) dependent on the detection unit.

3. Method according to claim 1 or 2 , characterized in that data from the speckle images is processed and evaluated in a data acquisition and analysis unit.

4. An apparatus for characterization of subjective speckle formation, especially for quantification of the speckle contrast, the apparatus comprising:

at least one processor; and

at least one memory including computer program code,

wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code are configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus at least to:

project an image onto a projection surface by means of a coherent or partly coherent light source,

generate speckle images of the projection surface with a detection unit, wherein exposure times (T) of the detection unit are changed in stepwise manner until an optimal exposure time (Topt), at which a speckle contrast (Cspeckle) is reduced to a maximum value,

generate a plurality of speckle images with the optimal exposure time (Topt) and forming of an average speckle image,

generate a plurality of images of the projection surface without projected image of the coherent or partly coherent light source with the optimal exposure time (Topt) and forming of an average dark image,

subtract the average dark image from the average speckle image for reduction of background illumination noise, and

form an intensity histogram for analysis of the image quality.

5. The apparatus according to claim 4 , wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code are configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus at least to adjust an aperture value (f) in dependence on speckle sizes (D) occurring in the speckle image and pixel size (P) dependent on the detection unit.

6. The apparatus according to claim 4 or claim 5 , wherein data from the speckle images is processed and evaluated in a data acquisition and analysis unit.

7. A non-transitory computer-readable medium encoded with instructions that, when executed in hardware, perform a process for characterization of subjective speckle formation, especially for quantification of the speckle contrast, the process comprising:

projecting an image onto a projection surface by means of a coherent or partly coherent light source,

generating speckle images of the projection surface with a detection unit, wherein exposure times (T) of the detection unit are changed in stepwise manner until an optimal exposure time (Topt), at which a speckle contrast (Cspeckle) is reduced to a maximum value,

generating a plurality of speckle images with the optimal exposure time (Topt) and forming of an average speckle image,

generating a plurality of images of the projection surface without projected image of the coherent or partly coherent light source with the optimal exposure time (Topt) and forming of an average dark image,

subtracting the average dark image from the average speckle image for reduction of background illumination noise, and

forming an intensity histogram for analysis of the image quality.

8. The non-transitory computer-readable medium according to claim 7 , wherein an aperture value (f) is adjusted in dependence on speckle sizes (D) occurring in the speckle image and pixel size (P) dependent on the detection unit.

9. The non-transitory computer-readable medium according to claim 7 or claim 8 , wherein data from the speckle images is processed and evaluated in a data acquisition and analysis unit.

Priority Claims (1)
DE 10 2015 114 376 · Aug 28, 2015 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20170064272A1 · Mar 2, 2017