IP Library Granted Patent US 10,241,841
Granted Patent B2
US 10,241,841 · App. 15/806,507 · Granted Mar 26, 2019

Controlling virtual machine density and placement distribution in a converged infrastructure resource pool

Inventors: Simon J. Kofkin-Hansen (Cary, NC); Richard T. Lemelin (South Portland, ME); Setareh Mehrabanzad (Easton, MD); Shawn P. Raess (Cary, NC)
Assignee: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
G06F9/5077G06F9/455G06F9/45533G06F9/45558G06F9/50G06F9/5027G06F9/5061G06F9/5072G06F9/5083G06F2009/4557G06F2009/45579G06F2009/45583G06F2009/45591G06F2009/45595G06F2209/5011
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,241,841
App. No.
15/806,507
Granted
Mar 26, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

Aspects include allocating virtual resources to physical resources in a computer environment and aggregating the virtual resources, as a virtual resource pool, at a per virtual machine level in the computer environment. Other aspects include evaluating the virtual resources in the virtual resource pool against resource pool domain constraints. Other aspects include determining a resource allocation adjustment as a function of the evaluating. The resource allocation adjustment is configured to achieve a maximum specified virtual machine density. Other aspects include adjusting the virtual resources based on the resource allocation adjustment.

Claims (29)

1. A method, comprising:

allocating virtual resources to physical resources in a computer environment;

aggregating the virtual resources, as a virtual resource pool, at a per virtual machine level in the computer environment;

evaluating the virtual resources in the virtual resource pool against resource pool domain constraints, wherein the resource pool domain constraints comprise a maximum size of a hypervisor domain, Layer 2 network adjacency domain size, maximum available storage input/output operations per second, maximum inter-switch link hops, and maximum virtual LANs and virtual SANs;

determining a resource allocation adjustment as a function of the evaluating, wherein the resource allocation adjustment is configured to achieve a maximum specified virtual machine density; and

adjusting the virtual resources based on the resource allocation adjustment; and

subsequent to adjusting the virtual machine resources based on the resource allocation adjustment, determining whether additional physical resources are needed in the computer environment.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the allocating the virtual resources to the physical resources includes allocating at least one of:

virtual CPUs per each physical core;

virtual memory per available memory of each physical node;

virtual network interface cards per each physical network interface card;

virtual switch ports per each physical port; and

available virtual storage associated with available physical storage.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the virtual resource pool includes a total number of virtual resources assigned per virtual machine, the assigned virtual resources including at least one of:

virtual CPUs;

virtual memory;

virtual network interface cards;

virtual storage;

virtual machines per virtual LAN; and

virtual machines per virtual SAN.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the virtual resources include available virtual load-balancers and available virtual firewalls.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the resource allocation adjustment includes adding a new virtual machine.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the resource allocation adjustment includes reclaiming an existing virtual machine.

7. A method, comprising:

allocating virtual resources to physical resources in a computer environment;

aggregating the virtual resources, as a virtual resource pool, at a per virtual machine level in the computer environment;

evaluating the virtual resources in the virtual resource pool against resource pool domain constraints, wherein the resource pool domain constraints comprise a maximum size of a hypervisor domain, wherein the resource pool domain constraints further comprise Layer 2 network adjacency domain size, maximum available storage input/output operations per second, maximum inter-switch link hops, and maximum virtual LANs and virtual SANs;

determining a resource allocation adjustment as a function of the evaluating, wherein the resource allocation adjustment is configured to achieve a maximum specified virtual machine density; and

adjusting the virtual resources based on the resource allocation adjustment.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 8, 2017
From: KOFKIN-HANSEN, SIMON J.; LEMELIN, RICHARD T.; MEHRABANZAD, SETAREH; RAESS, SHAWN P.
To: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 044071/0440 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 14919766 · Oct 22, 2015
Continuation 14826510 · Aug 14, 2015
Related Publication 20180067782A1 · Mar 8, 2018