IP Library Granted Patent US 10,273,535
Granted Patent B2
US 10,273,535 · App. 16/054,960 · Granted Apr 30, 2019

Electrochemical detection of bacterial and/or fungal infections

Inventors: Bradley Adam Brown (San Marcos, CA); Milena Iacobelli Martinez (Vista, CA); Lisa Lynn Freeman-Cook (Carlsbad, CA); John Jay Harvey (San Marcos, CA); Christine J. Shaw (San Diego, CA); Anna Maria Al-Khouri (San Diego, CA)
Assignee: Clinical Micro Sensors, Inc.
C12Q1/686B01L3/5023B01L3/5027C12Q1/6853B01L2300/0819C12Q2600/16
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,273,535
App. No.
16/054,960
Granted
Apr 30, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present disclosure relates to methods and devices for amplifying a plurality of targets in a single PCR run while distinguishing between clinically relevant amplification and amplification from other sources such as from background contamination. The methods and devices further enable discrimination between gram-positive, gram-negative and fungal infections as wells as identify antimicrobial resistance genes. When applying the methods and devices of the invention, the species or genus of an infection(s), and genus of a fungal co-infection(s) or category of bacterial (gram-positive or negative) co-infection(s) are identified. Species identification of co-infections can also be achieved. Further, when applying the methods and devices of the invention, organisms which are likely to be contaminating organisms from a blood draw are identified.

Claims (67)

1. A method to diagnose a gram-positive bacterial infection and a gram-negative bacterial and/or fungal co-infection in a patient, the method comprising:

a. assessing, in a sample identified by a gram-stain culture as gram-positive, data that detects:

i. gram-positive bacteria in the sample by its genus,

ii. the gram-positive bacteria in the sample by its species,

iii. gram-negative bacteria,

iv. the gram-negative bacteria by its species, and

v. fungus in the sample by its species,

wherein data that detects gram-negative bacteria by its species and fungus in the sample by its species is co-infection species data;

b. categorizing the data from group (iii) and group (iv) as either positive or negative for gram-negative bacteria;

c. categorizing the data from group (v) as either positive or negative for fungus;

d. reporting the infection by the species or genus of the gram-positive bacteria; and

e. reporting the co-infection as a gram-negative bacterial infection and/or a fungal infection but not reporting the co-infection species data.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the sample comprises viable gram-positive bacteria and non-viable gram-positive bacteria.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the viable gram-positive bacteria are present in the sample at a lower concentration than the non-viable gram-positive bacteria.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the data is obtained after the sample is subjected to a single detuned multiplex end-point polymerase chain reaction (PCR), the PCR comprising about 30 to about 35 cycles.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the gram-positive bacteria are Bacillus cereus, Micrococcus, Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus aureus, Propionibacterium acnes, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus lugdunensis, Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus, Enterococcus faecium, Streptococcus agalactiae, Lactobacillus, Listeria, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Listeria monocytogenes , or Streptococcus pyogenes.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising categorizing the data from group (i) and group (ii) as either resistant or sensitive to methicillin or vancomycin.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein reporting in steps d and e comprises automatically generating and sending a detection report to a laboratory information system (LIS) interchange.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the data is obtained by detecting electrochemical signals.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the method is carried out in a sample-to-answer system, wherein the sample-to-answer system is configured to (i) receive a test order from a hospital laboratory information system (LIS), (ii) generate a detection report and (iii) automatically send the detection report to the hospital LIS.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the method is carried out in a sample-to-answer system, wherein the sample-to-answer system is configured to connect to more than one hospital LIS.

11. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: assessing, in a second portion of the sample, data that detects:

i. gram-negative bacteria in the sample by its genus,

ii. the gram-negative bacteria in the sample by its species,

iii. gram-positive bacteria,

iv. the gram-positive bacteria by its species, and

v. fungus in the sample by its species,

wherein data that detects gram-positive bacteria by its species and fungus in the sample by its species is second portion co-infection species data;

b. categorizing the data from group (iii) and (iv) as either positive or negative for gram-positive bacteria in the second portion;

c. categorizing the data from group (v) as either positive or negative for fungus in the second portion;

d. reporting the infection as a gram-positive bacterial infection in the second portion; and

e. reporting the co-infection by the species or genus of the gram-negative bacteria and/or as a fungal infection in the second portion but not reporting the second portion co-infection species data.

12. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

assessing, in a second portion of the sample, data that detects fungus in the sample by its species; and

reporting the co-infection by the species or genus of the fungus.

13. A method to diagnose a gram-negative bacterial infection and a gram-positive bacterial and/or fungal co-infection in a patient the method comprising:

a. assessing, in a sample identified by a gram-stain culture as gram-negative, data that detects:

i. gram-negative bacteria in the sample by its genus,

ii. the gram-negative bacteria in the sample by its species,

iii. gram-positive bacteria,

iv. the gram-positive bacteria by its species, and

v. fungus in the sample by its species,

wherein data that detects gram-positive bacteria by its species and fungus in the sample by its species is co-infection species data;

b. categorizing the data from group (iii) and group (iv) as either positive or negative for gram-positive bacteria;

c. categorizing the data from group (v) as either positive or negative for fungus;

d. reporting the infection by the species or genus of the gram-negative bacteria; and

e. reporting the co-infection as a gram-positive bacterial infection and/or a fungal infection but not reporting the co-infection species data.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the sample comprises viable and non-viable gram-positive bacteria.

15. The method of claim 13 , further comprising:

assessing, in a second portion of the sample, data that detects:

i. gram-positive bacteria in the sample by its genus,

ii. the gram-positive bacteria in the sample by its species,

iii. gram-negative bacteria,

iv. the gram-negative bacteria by its species, and

v. fungus in the sample by its species,

wherein data that detects gram-negative bacteria by its species and fungus in the sample by its species is second portion co-infection species data;

b. categorizing the data from group (iii) and group (iv) as either positive or negative for gram-negative bacteria in the second portion;

c. categorizing the data from group (v) as either positive or negative for fungus in the second portion;

d. reporting the infection as a gram-negative bacterial infection in the second portion; and

e. reporting the co-infection by the species or genus of the gram-positive bacteria and/or as a fungal infection in the second portion but not reporting the second portion co-infection species data.

16. The method of claim 13 , further comprising:

assessing, in a second portion of the sample, data that detects fungus in the sample by its species; and

reporting the infection by the species or genus of the fungus.

17. The method of claim 13 , wherein the data is obtained by detecting electrochemical signals.

18. The method of claim 13 , further comprising categorizing the data from group (i) and group (ii) as either resistant or sensitive to CTX-M, IMP, KPC, NDM, OXA, or VIM.

19. The method of claim 13 , wherein reporting in steps d and e comprises automatically generating and sending a detection report to a LIS interchange.

20. The method of claim 13 , wherein the method is carried out in a sample-to-answer system wherein the sample-to-answer system is configured to (i) receive a test order from a hospital LIS, (ii) generate a detection report and (iii) automatically send the detection report to the hospital LIS.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 18, 2021
From: GENMARK DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
To: ROCHE MOLECULAR SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 058189/0563 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 21, 2018
From: BROWN, BRADLEY ADAM; MARTINEZ, MILENA IACOBELLI; FREEMAN-COOK, LISA LYNN; HARVEY, JOHN JAY; SHAW, CHRISTINE J.; AL-KHOURI, ANNA MARIA
To: CLINICAL MICRO SENSORS, INC. DBA GENMARK DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
Reel/Frame 046654/0598 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 15828074 · Nov 30, 2017
Continuation 15686001 · Aug 24, 2017
Related Publication 20190062803A1 · Feb 28, 2019