Seismic survey analysis
A method can include receiving data sets where each of the data sets corresponds to one of a plurality of individual emitter-detector arrangements; calculating a multi-dimensional similarity metric for one of the data sets; and, based at least in part on the multi-dimensional similarity metric, assessing the one data set.
1. A method for enhanced image generation from seismic energy survey data, the method comprising:
via an interface of a computer, receiving seismic energy data sets of seismic energy survey data wherein each of the seismic energy data sets corresponds to one of a plurality of individual seismic energy emitter-detector arrangements wherein each of the plurality of individual seismic energy emitter-detector arrangements corresponds to an angle or an offset of a seismic energy amplitude versus angle (AVA) or a seismic energy amplitude versus offset (AVO) survey of a geologic environment that comprises structural features identifiable in an image generated via at least a portion of the seismic energy survey data wherein the seismic energy survey data comprises seismic energy attenuation data and seismic energy reflection data from interactions of emitted seismic energy with structural features of the geologic environment;
via the computer, calculating structural dip based at least in part on a portion of the seismic energy survey data;
via the computer, calculating a multi-dimensional similarity metric for one of the seismic energy data sets, wherein the multi-dimensional similarity metric is based at least in part on the structural dip;
based at least in part on the multi-dimensional similarity metric, making an assessment of the one seismic energy data set with respect to at least one of the structural features of the geologic environment to assess structure-based seismic energy imaging error as a function of angle or offset of the AVA or AVO survey; and
based at least in part on the assessment, via the computer, processing at least a portion of the seismic energy survey data to account for the structure-based seismic energy imaging error to generate the image as an enhanced image.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein, for the one seismic energy data set, the calculating a multi-dimensional similarity metric comprises calculating individual similarity values for individual samples of the one seismic energy data set.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein the assessment comprises a data quality assessment.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein the making the assessment comprises classifying data with respect to at least one of a plurality of classes.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein the making the assessment comprises assigning an error to the one seismic energy data set wherein the error corresponds to the angle or the offset of the one seismic energy data set.
6. The method of claim 1 comprising weighting at least the one of the seismic energy data sets based on the assessment.
7. The method of claim 6 comprising performing a quality-weighted AVO or AVA inversion using at least a portion of a weighted one of the seismic energy data sets.
8. The method of claim 6 wherein the weighting reduces the influence of seismic energy data assessed, per the assessment, to a low data quality class.
9. The method of claim 1 comprising generating a similarity stack.
10. The method of claim 1 wherein calculating the multi-dimensional similarity metric comprises generating reference values.
11. The method of claim 10 wherein the reference values comprise estimated structural dip values.
12. A system comprising:
a processor;
memory operatively coupled to the processor; and
processor-executable instructions stored in the memory to instruct the system, the instructions comprising instructions to
receive seismic energy data sets of seismic energy survey data wherein each of the seismic energy data sets corresponds to one of a plurality of individual seismic energy emitter-detector arrangements wherein each of the plurality of individual seismic energy emitter-detector arrangements corresponds to an angle or an offset of a seismic energy amplitude versus angle (AVA) or a seismic energy amplitude versus offset (AVO) survey of a geologic environment that comprises structural features identifiable in an image generated via at least a portion of the seismic energy survey data wherein the seismic energy survey data comprises seismic energy attenuation data and seismic energy reflection data from interactions of emitted seismic energy with structural features of the geologic environment;
calculate structural dip based at least in part on a portion of the seismic energy survey data;
calculate a multi-dimensional similarity metric for one of the seismic energy data sets, wherein the multi-dimensional similarity metric is based at least in part on the structural dip;
based at least in part on the multi-dimensional similarity metric, make an assessment of the one seismic energy data set with respect to at least one of the structural features of the geologic environment to assess structure-based seismic energy imaging error as a function of angle or offset of the AVA or AVO survey; and
based at least in part on the assessment, process at least a portion of the seismic energy survey data to account for the structure-based seismic energy imaging error to generate the image as an enhanced image.
13. The system of claim 12 wherein, for the one seismic energy data set, the instructions to calculate a multi-dimensional similarity metric comprise instructions to calculate individual similarity values for individual samples of the one seismic energy data set.
14. The system of claim 12 wherein the processor-executable instructions stored in the memory comprise instructions to instruct the system to: weight at least the one of the seismic energy data sets based on the assessment; and perform a quality-weighted AVO or AVA inversion using at least a portion of a weighted one of the seismic energy data sets.
15. One or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media comprising computer-executable instructions to instruct a computer, the instructions comprising instructions to:
receive seismic energy data sets of seismic energy survey data wherein each of the seismic energy data sets corresponds to one of a plurality of individual seismic energy emitter-detector arrangements wherein each of the plurality of individual seismic energy emitter-detector arrangements corresponds to an angle or an offset of a seismic energy amplitude versus angle (AVA) or a seismic energy amplitude versus offset (AVO) survey of a geologic environment that comprises structural features identifiable in an image generated via at least a portion of the seismic energy survey data wherein the seismic energy survey data comprises seismic energy attenuation data and seismic energy reflection data from interactions of emitted seismic energy with structural features of the geologic environment;
calculate structural dip based at least in part on a portion of the seismic energy survey data;
calculate a multi-dimensional similarity metric for one of the seismic energy data sets, wherein the multi-dimensional similarity metric is based at least in part on the structural dip;
based at least in part on the multi-dimensional similarity metric, make an assessment of the one seismic energy data set with respect to at least one of the structural features of the geologic environment to assess structure-based seismic energy imaging error as a function of angle or offset of the AVA or AVO survey; and
based at least in part on the assessment, process at least a portion of the seismic energy survey data to account for the structure-based seismic energy imaging error to generate the image as an enhanced image.
16. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 15 wherein the instructions to make an assessment comprise instructions to classify data with respect to at least one of a plurality of classes.
17. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 16 wherein the plurality of classes comprises a spectrum of data quality classes that range from low data quality to high data quality.
18. The system of claim 12 wherein the processor-executable instructions stored in the memory comprise instructions to instruct the system to: assign an error to the one seismic energy data set wherein the error corresponds to the angle or the offset of the one seismic energy data set.
19. The method of claim 1 comprising performing seismic energy surveys of the geologic environment that generate the seismic energy data sets of seismic energy survey data.
20. The method of claim 1 comprising identifying structural features of the geologic environment in the enhanced image.