IP Library Granted Patent US 10,403,076
Granted Patent B2
US 10,403,076 · App. 15/429,093 · Granted Sep 3, 2019

Method for securing and verifying a document

Inventors: Herve Chabanne (Issy les Moulineaux, FR); Jean-Christophe Fondeur (Issy les Moulineaux, FR); Stephane Gentric (Issy les Moulineaux, FR); Erik Van Dijk (Issy les Moulineaux, FR)
Assignee: SAFRAN IDENTITY & SECURITY
G07D7/2016G01N21/00G07D7/003G07D7/004G07D7/005G07D7/0032G07D7/0034G07D7/0047G07D7/0053G07D7/01G07D7/205G07D7/2083
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,403,076
App. No.
15/429,093
Granted
Sep 3, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

The invention relates to a method for securing a document including a visual element, carried out by a processing unit comprising processing means, the method comprising generation, from the visual element, of a reference security datum, and storage of the reference security datum, wherein the reference security datum is generated by means of an algorithm configured so as to generate: for any image acquired from the visual element, a security datum whereof the differences relative to the reference security datum are less than a determined threshold, and for any image acquired on a different visual element, a security datum whereof the differences relative to the reference security datum are greater than said threshold.

Claims (41)

1. A method for securing a document including a visual element, carried out by a processing unit comprising processing means, the method comprising

generation, from the visual element, of a reference security datum, and

storage of the reference security datum,

wherein the reference security datum is generated by processing means of an algorithm parameterized from training on a learning database,

wherein, for training the algorithm, the algorithm is executed

on a large number of pairs of images, and indications are provided on those which must result in substantially identical security data,

on other pairs of images which must result in substantially different security data.

2. The method for securing a document according to claim 1 , wherein generation of the reference security datum is carried out during creation of the document.

3. The method for securing a document according to claim 1 , wherein the reference security datum is stored in the document, by display, for example printing, of the datum on the document or by recording of the datum in an electronic chip stored in the document.

4. The method for securing a document according to claim 3 , wherein the reference security datum is signed by the processing unit, by processing means of a signature algorithm with public key, or recorded with a certificate of authenticity obtained by application of a coding algorithm based on use of an error-correction code, so-called secure sketch.

5. The method for securing a document according to claim 1 , wherein the reference security datum is stored by being recorded in a database.

6. The method for securing a document according to claim 1 , wherein the reference security datum is stored in the document by display, for example printing, of the datum on the document and wherein the visual element is also displayed, for example printed, on the document.

7. The method for securing a document according to claim 1 , wherein the document is an electronic document preferably comprising display means.

8. The method for securing a document according to claim 1 , wherein the algorithm is selected such that reconstitution of the visual element from the corresponding security datum is impossible.

9. The method for securing a document according to claim 1 , wherein the algorithm is of the type comprising the use of histograms of gradients oriented on the visual element, or of convolutional neural networks, or of descriptor algorithm type.

10. The method for securing a document according to claim 1 , wherein the algorithm is a descriptor algorithm of BRIEF type, or

of SIFT type, or of SURF type or of GLOH type, or of ORB type, or of BRISK type or

of FREAK type or of LATCH type.

11. The method for securing a document according to claim 1 , wherein said algorithm being trained so as to generate:

for any image acquired from the visual element, a security datum whereof the differences relative to the reference security datum are less than a determined threshold, and

for any image acquired on a different visual element, a security datum whereof the differences relative to the reference security datum are greater than said threshold.

12. A computer program product stored on a non-transitory medium, comprising code instructions for carrying out a method according to claim 1 , when it is executed by processing means of a processing unit.

13. A secure document which can be obtained by carrying out a method according to claim 1 .

14. The method for securing a document according to claim 1 , wherein the visual element is an image of the face of an individual, and the algorithm is trained so as to generate:

for any image acquired from the image of the face of the individual featured on the document, a security datum whereof the differences relative to the reference security datum are less than a determined threshold, and

for any image acquired from an image representing another individual, or the same individual in different image acquisition conditions, a security datum whereof the differences relative to the reference security datum are greater than said threshold.

15. The method for securing a document including a visual element, carried out by a processing unit comprising processing means, the method

comprising generation, from the visual element, of a reference security datum, and storage of the reference security datum,

wherein the reference security datum is generated by processing means of an algorithm parameterized from training on a learning database, said algorithm being trained so as to generate:

for any image acquired from the visual element, a security datum whereof the differences relative to the reference security datum are less than a determined threshold, and

for any image acquired on a different visual element, a security datum whereof the differences relative to the reference security datum are greater than said threshold.

16. A method for verifying the integrity of a document secured by carrying out the method according to claim 1 , the method comprising the steps of:

acquiring an image of the visual element of the document,

generating, from the image, a security datum by the same algorithm as that having generated the reference security datum,

comparing the security datum obtained to the reference security datum, and

if the differences between the security datum and the reference security datum are less than the determined threshold, determining that the visual element is integral, if not determining that the visual element is fraudulent.

17. The verification method according to claim 16 , wherein the method further comprises, prior to the comparison step, a verification step of the integrity of the reference security datum.

18. A system for verifying a document, comprising:

an image sensor,

a processing unit, comprising processing means adapted to carry out, on an image acquired by the sensor, a classification algorithm, and a communications interface with a database,

the verification system being configured to carry out the method according to claim 16 .

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded May 1, 2020
From: SAFRAN IDENTITY & SECURITY
To: IDEMIA IDENTITY & SECURITY FRANCE
Reel/Frame 052555/0428 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 13, 2017
From: CHABANNE, HERVE; FONDEUR, JEAN-CHRISTOPHE; GENTRIC, STEPHANE; VAN DUK, ERIK
To: SAFRAN IDENTITY & SECURITY
Reel/Frame 044113/0174 →
Priority Claims (1)
FR 16 51105 · Feb 11, 2016 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20170236355A1 · Aug 17, 2017
Cited By (1)
US 12,547,748