IP Library Granted Patent US 10,548,976
Granted Patent B2
US 10,548,976 · App. 15/574,897 · Granted Feb 4, 2020

In vitro cell culture methods for beta-thalassemia using activin type II receptor ligand traps

Inventors: Maria Cappellini (Milan, IT); Victoria Sung (San Francisco, CA)
Assignee: Celgene Corporation
A61K39/3955A61K35/18A61K38/179A61K39/39541A61P7/00C12Q1/025G01N33/4833A61K2039/505A61K2039/515
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,548,976
App. No.
15/574,897
Granted
Feb 4, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

Provided herein are methods of treating beta-thalassemia in a subject comprising administering to the subject an activin type II receptor (ActRII) signaling inhibitor (e.g., an activin ligand trap) and utilizing one or more in vitro cell culture methods provided herein in (i) selection of the subject to be treated according to the methods provided herein; and/or (ii) monitoring of the subject being treated according to the methods provided herein.

Claims (124)

1. A method of treating beta-thalassemia in a subject, comprising administering an ActRII signaling inhibitor to the subject, wherein the patient has been selected by using an in vitro cell culture method comprising the steps of:

(a) co-culturing an erythroid progenitor cell (EPC) and a stromal cell in the presence of an activin type II receptor (ActRII) signaling inhibitor for a period of time; and

(b) determining the level of GYPA, GATA1, GATA2, or alpha-globin in the EPC or determining the level of expansion of the EPC, wherein the stromal cell and/or the EPC has been obtained from the subject;

wherein the selected subject has:

(i) an increase in the level of GYPA in the EPC of the in vitro cell culture method as compared to the level of GYPA in a control EPC;

(ii) an increase in the level of GATA1 in the EPC of the in vitro cell culture method as compared to the level of GATA1 in a control EPC;

(iii) a decrease in the level of GATA2 in the EPC of the in vitro cell culture method as compared to the level of GATA2 in a control EPC;

(iv) a decrease in the level of alpha-globin in the EPC of the in vitro cell culture method as compared to the level of alpha-globin in a control EPC; or

(v) an increase in the level of expansion of the EPC in the in vitro cell culture method as compared to the level of expansion in a control EPC;

or an in vitro cell culture method comprising the steps of:

(a) culturing a stromal cell that has been obtained from the subject in the presence of an activin type II receptor (ActRII) signaling inhibitor for a period of time; and

(b) determining the level of ICAM-1, IL-1Ra, survivin, Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, MCP-1, serpinE1, GRO-a, IL-8, IL-10, IL-2, RANTES, IP-10, IL-1a, IL-1b, MIF, G-CSF, GMCSF, C5a, IL-6, HO-2, HIF-1a, TRAIL R1, cleaved caspase-3, p27, p21, Bax, Bad, CIAP1, or PON2 in the supernatant obtained from the culture of step (a);

wherein the selected subject has:

(i) an increase in the level of ICAM-1 in the supernatant of the in vitro cell culture method as compared to the level of ICAM-1 in a control supernatant

(ii) an increase in the level of IL-1Ra in the supernatant of the in vitro cell culture as compared to the level of IL-1Ra in a control supernatant

(iii) an increase in the level of survivin in the supernatant of the in vitro cell culture method as compared to the level of survivin in a control supernatant

(iv) an increase in the level of Bcl-2 in the supernatant of the in vitro cell culture method as compared to the level of Bcl-2 in a control supernatant;

(v) an increase in the level of Bcl-xL in the supernatant of the in vitro cell culture method as compared to the level of Bcl-xL in a control supernatant;

(vi) an increase in the level of MCP-1 in the supernatant of the in vitro cell culture method as compared to the level of MCP-1 in a control supernatant;

(vii) an increase in the level of serpinE1 in the supernatant of the in vitro cell culture method as compared to the level of serpinE1 in a control supernatant;

(viii) an increase in the level of GRO-a in the supernatant of the in vitro cell culture method as compared to the level of GRO-a in a control supernatant;

(ix) an increase in the level of IL-8 in the supernatant of the in vitro cell culture method as compared to the level of IL-8 in a control supernatant;

(x) an increase in the level of IL-10 in the supernatant of the in vitro cell culture method as compared to the level of IL-10 in a control supernatant;

(xi) an increase in the level of IL-2 in the supernatant of the in vitro cell culture method as compared to the level of IL-2 in a control supernatant;

(xii) an increase in the level of CIAP1 in the supernatant of the in vitro cell culture method as compared to the level of CIAP1 in a control supernatant;

(xiii) an increase in the level of PON2 in the supernatant of the in vitro cell culture method as compared to the level of PON2 in a control supernatant;

(xiv) a decrease in the level of RANTES in the supernatant of the in vitro cell culture method as compared to the level of RANTES in a control supernatant;

(xv) a decrease in the level of IP-10 in the supernatant of the in vitro cell culture method as compared to the level of IP-10 in a control supernatant;

(xvi) a decrease in the level of IL-1a in the supernatant of the in vitro cell culture method as compared to the level of IL-1a in a control supernatant;

(xvii) a decrease in the level of IL-1b in the supernatant of the in vitro cell culture method as compared to the level of IL-1b in a control supernatant;

(xviii) a decrease in the level of MIF in the supernatant of the in vitro cell culture method as compared to the level of MIF in a control supernatant;

(xix) a decrease in the level of G-CSF in the supernatant of the in vitro cell culture method as compared to the level of G-CSF in a control supernatant;

(xx) a decrease in the level of GMCSF in the supernatant of the in vitro cell culture method as compared to the level of GMCSF in a control supernatant;

(xxi) a decrease in the level of C5a in the supernatant of the in vitro cell culture method as compared to the level of C5a in a control supernatant;

(xxii) a decrease in the level of IL-6 in the supernatant of the in vitro cell culture method as compared to the level of IL-6 in a control supernatant;

(xxiii) a decrease in the level of HO-2 in the supernatant of the in vitro cell culture method as compared to the level of HO-2 in a control supernatant;

(xxiv) a decrease in the level of HIF-1a in the supernatant of the in vitro cell culture method as compared to the level of HIF-1a in a control supernatant;

(xxv) a decrease in the level of TRAIL R1 in the supernatant of the in vitro cell culture method as compared to the level of TRAIL R1 in a control supernatant;

(xxvi) a decrease in the level of cleaved caspase-3 in the supernatant of the in vitro cell culture method as compared to the level of cleaved caspase-3 in a control supernatant;

(xxvii) a decrease in the level of p27 in the supernatant of the in vitro cell culture method as compared to the level of p27 in a control supernatant;

(xxviii) a decrease in the level of p21 in the supernatant of the in vitro cell culture method as compared to the level of p21 in a control supernatant;

(xxix) a decrease in the level of Bax in the supernatant of the in vitro cell culture method as compared to the level of Bax in a control supernatant; and/or

(xxx) a decrease in the level of Bad in the supernatant of the in vitro cell culture method as compared to the level of bad in a control supernatant.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the patient is being monitored using the in vitro cell culture method.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the subject is a human.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the stromal cell has been obtained from the bone marrow the subject.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the erythroid progenitor cell has been obtained from peripheral blood of the subject.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the ActRII signaling inhibitor is a polypeptide comprising an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of:

(a) 90% identical to SEQ ID NO:2;

(b) 95% identical to SEQ ID NO:2;

(c) 98% identical to SEQ ID NO:2;

(d) SEQ ID NO:2;

(e) 90% identical to SEQ ID NO:3;

(f) 95% identical to SEQ ID NO:3;

(g) 98% identical to SEQ ID NO:3;

(h) SEQ ID NO:3;

(i) 90% identical to SEQ ID NO:6;

(j) 95% identical to SEQ ID NO:6;

(k) 98% identical to SEQ ID NO:6;

(l) SEQ ID NO:6;

(m) 90% identical to SEQ ID NO:7;

(n) 95% identical to SEQ ID NO:7;

(o) 98% identical to SEQ ID NO:7;

(p) SEQ ID NO:7;

(q) 90% identical to SEQ ID NO:12;

(r) 95% identical to SEQ ID NO:12;

(s) 98% identical to SEQ ID NO:12;

(t) SEQ ID NO:12;

(u) 90% identical to SEQ ID NO:17;

(v) 95% identical to SEQ ID NO:17;

(w) 98% identical to SEQ ID NO:17;

(x) SEQ ID NO:17;

(y) 90% identical to SEQ ID NO:20;

(z) 95% identical to SEQ ID NO:20;

(aa) 98% identical to SEQ ID NO:20;

(bb) SEQ ID NO:20;

(cc) 90% identical to SEQ ID NO:21;

(dd) 95% identical to SEQ ID NO:21;

(ee) 98% identical to SEQ ID NO:21;

(ff) SEQ ID NO:21;

(gg) 90% identical to SEQ ID NO:25;

(hh) 95% identical to SEQ ID NO:25;

(ii) 98% identical to SEQ ID NO:25; and

(jj) SEQ ID NO:25.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the ActRII signaling inhibitor is an ActRIIA signaling inhibitor.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the ActRIIA signaling inhibitor is a polypeptide comprising an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of:

(a) 90% identical to SEQ ID NO:2;

(b) 95% identical to SEQ ID NO:2;

(c) 98% identical to SEQ ID NO:2;

(d) SEQ ID NO:2;

(e) 90% identical to SEQ ID NO:3;

(f) 95% identical to SEQ ID NO:3;

(g) 98% identical to SEQ ID NO:3;

(h) SEQ ID NO:3;

(i) 90% identical to SEQ ID NO:6;

(j) 95% identical to SEQ ID NO:6;

(k) 98% identical to SEQ ID NO:6;

(l) SEQ ID NO:6;

(m) 90% identical to SEQ ID NO:7;

(n) 95% identical to SEQ ID NO:7;

(o) 98% identical to SEQ ID NO:7; and

(p) SEQ ID NO:7.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the ActRII signaling inhibitor is a polypeptide comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:7.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the ActRII signaling inhibitor is a humanized fusion-protein consisting of the extracellular domain of ActRIIA and the human IgG1 Fc domain.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the wherein the ActRII signaling inhibitor is a signaling inhibitor of ActRIIB.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the ActRIIB signaling inhibitor is a polypeptide comprising an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of:

(a) 90% identical to SEQ ID NO:17;

(b) 95% identical to SEQ ID NO:17;

(c) 98% identical to SEQ ID NO:17;

(d) SEQ ID NO:17;

(e) 90% identical to SEQ ID NO:20;

(f) 95% identical to SEQ ID NO:20;

(g) 98% identical to SEQ ID NO:20;

(h) SEQ ID NO:20;

(i) 90% identical to SEQ ID NO:21;

(j) 95% identical to SEQ ID NO:21;

(k) 98% identical to SEQ ID NO:21;

(l) SEQ ID NO:21;

(m) 90% identical to SEQ ID NO:25;

(n) 95% identical to SEQ ID NO:25;

(o) 98% identical to SEQ ID NO:25; and

(p) SEQ ID NO:25.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the ActRII signaling inhibitor is a polypeptide comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:25.

14. The method of any of claim 1 , wherein the ActRII signaling inhibitor is a humanized fusion-protein consisting of the extracellular domain of ActRIIB and the human IgG1 Fc domain.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 15, 2019
From: SUNG, VICTORIA
To: CELGENE CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 050720/0022 →
Continuity (3)
Provisional Application 62164367 · May 20, 2015
Provisional Application 62320032 · Apr 8, 2016
Related Publication 20180161426A1 · Jun 14, 2018
Cited By (1)
US 12,186,370