IP Library Granted Patent US 10,553,501
Granted Patent B2
US 10,553,501 · App. 15/938,958 · Granted Feb 4, 2020

Apparatus for use in forming an adaptive layer and a method of using the same

Inventors: Anshuman Cherala (Austin, TX); Mario J. Meissl (Austin, TX)
Assignee: CANON KABUSHIKI KAISHA
H01L22/12H01L21/0337
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,553,501
App. No.
15/938,958
Granted
Feb 4, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

An apparatus can include a logic element configured to generate information corresponding to an adaptive layer to be formed over a current substrate based at least in part on a difference in flatness profiles associated with a first substrate chuck and a second substrate chuck. In another aspect, a method can include obtaining a difference in thickness profiles for the first and second chucks using a prior substrate, and forming an adaptive layer over a previously formed patterned layer of a current substrate and before forming a patterned resist layer aligned to the previously formed patterned layer. In an embodiment, the thickness profile of the adaptive layer is a function of the inverse of the difference in flatness profiles of the substrate chucks. The adaptive layer can help to reduce overlay error associated with different flatness profiles of substrate chucks.

Claims (32)

1. An apparatus comprising:

a logic element, wherein the logic element

obtains a raw overlay error between a first patterned layer and a second patterned layer over a first substrate, wherein the first patterned layer was patterned using a first substrate chuck, and the second patterned layer was patterned using a second substrate chuck;

determines a difference in flatness profiles associated with the first substrate chuck and the second substrate chuck, wherein the difference in flatness profiles is based at least in part on the raw overlay error between the first patterned layer and the second patterned layer;

generates information corresponding to an adaptive layer to be formed over a second substrate in response to the difference in flatness profiles associated with the first substrate chuck and the second substrate chuck; and

removes an imprint distortion contribution that corresponds to an imprint distortion associated with the difference in the flatness profiles in a first imprint template used to form the first patterned layer, a second imprint template used to form the second patterned layer, or the first and second imprint templates.

2. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the logic element is further configured to remove an alignment contribution that corresponds to a misalignment between the first and second patterned layers.

3. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the logic element is further configured to remove a mean field signature, wherein the mean field signature corresponds to repetitive errors that are averaged over all fields.

4. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the logic element is further configured to remove a flatness induced distortion contribution associated with the first and second substrate chucks.

5. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the information corresponding to an adaptive layer includes a fluid droplet pattern associated with the adaptive layer.

6. An apparatus comprising a logic element configured to:

obtain a raw overlay error between a first patterned layer and a second patterned layer over a first substrate, wherein the first patterned layer was patterned using a first substrate chuck, and the second patterned layer was patterned using a second substrate chuck;

generate information corresponding to an adaptive layer to be formed over a second substrate based at least in part on a difference in flatness profiles associated with a first substrate chuck and the second substrate chuck;

remove an alignment contribution corresponds to a misalignment between the first and second patterned layers;

remove an imprint distortion contribution that corresponds to an imprint distortion associated with the difference in the flatness profiles in a first imprint template used to form the first patterned layer, a second imprint template used to form the second patterned layer, or the first and second imprint templates; and

remove a flatness induced distortion contribution associated with the second substrate chuck.

7. The apparatus of claim 6 , wherein the logic element is further configured to:

remove a mean field signature, wherein the mean field signature corresponds to repetitive errors that are averaged over all fields.

8. A method, comprising:

determining a difference in flatness profiles associated with a first substrate chuck and a second substrate chuck; and

forming an adaptive layer over a first substrate, wherein the adaptive layer has a thickness profile that is a function of an inverse of the difference in the flatness profiles, and wherein determining the difference in flatness profiles comprises:

measuring a raw overlay error between a first patterned layer and a second patterned layer over a second substrate, wherein the first patterned layer was patterned using the first substrate chuck, and the second patterned layer was patterned using the second substrate chuck;

removing an alignment contribution that corresponds to a misalignment between the first and second patterned layers;

removing an imprint distortion contribution that corresponds to an imprint distortion associated with a first imprint template used to form the first patterned layer, a second imprint template used to form the second patterned layer, or the first and second imprint templates; and

estimating a distortion due to differences in flatness profiles of the first and second substrate chucks.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein determining the difference in flatness profiles further comprises removing a mean field signature, wherein the mean field signature corresponds to repetitive errors that are averaged over all fields.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein determining the difference in flatness profiles further comprising determining the mean field signature associated with a first imprint template used to form the first patterned layer, a second imprint template used to form the second patterned layer, or the first and second imprint templates.

11. The method of claim 8 , wherein determining the difference in flatness profiles further comprises removing a flatness induced distortion contribution associated with the first and second substrate chucks.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the estimated distortion corresponds to the flatness induced distortion contribution.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein determining the difference in flatness profiles further comprises removing a mean field signature, wherein the mean field signature corresponds to repetitive errors that are averaged over all fields.

14. The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

forming a formable material over the adaptive layer and the current substrate.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 13, 2018
From: CHERALA, ANSHUMAN; MEISSL, MARIO J.
To: CANON KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Reel/Frame 046076/0783 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20190304850A1 · Oct 3, 2019
Cited By (1)
US 12,498,634