IP Library Granted Patent US 10,710,128
Granted Patent B2
US 10,710,128 · App. 16/054,710 · Granted Jul 14, 2020

Hydrogen sulfide absorbing alternative landfill cover material

Inventors: Richard S. Burns, Sr. (Elkins Park, PA); Allen T. Burns (Jenkintown, PA)
B09B1/004C04B18/16C04B18/22C04B18/26C04B30/00B01J2220/4887B03B9/065C04B2111/00775
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,710,128
App. No.
16/054,710
Granted
Jul 14, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

A reformulated barrier material for use as an alternative cover for landfills made from recycled materials which may comprise construction and/or demolition debris to which is added tire derived rubber particles to inhibit the release of hydrogen sulfide gas through the reformulated barrier material to the surrounding atmosphere from the landfill beneath.

Claims (25)

1. A method for producing an odor absorbing product for use as a reformulated alternative cover material for landfills using recycled material comprising the steps of:

(a) receiving construction and demolition debris in a first area;

b) receiving clean fill in a second area;

(c) receiving sized rubber material in a third area;

(d) positive sorting at least one of masonry products, concrete, bricks, cinder block, rocks, and asphalt from the construction and demolition debris from the first area;

(e) positive sorting a remaining portion of the construction and demolition debris from step (d) to remove recyclable materials including at least one of cardboard, wood, fiber, ferrous metal and non-ferrous metal;

(f) negative sorting a remainder of the construction and demolition debris from step (e) to remove materials other than wood, roofing material, and insulating board to form a first feed stock component;

(g) grinding the first feed stock component to a desired particle size of up to approximately six inches to form a first feed stock;

(h) mixing the at least one of the masonry products, concrete, bricks, cinder block, rocks and asphalt with the clean fill from the second area to form a second feed stock component;

(i) grinding the second feed stock component to a desired particle size of up to approximately six inches to form a second feed stock;

(j) blending the first and second feed stocks in a proportion of approximately 2:1 to approximately 5:1 by weight to form an alternative cover material for landfills using recycled material to produce an alternative cover material; and

(k) blending a feed of sized rubber material into the alternative cover material in a proportion of greater than zero and less than approximately 50 percent by volume to form a permeable, hydrogen sulfide absorbing alternative cover material.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the proportion of the sized rubber material added to the alternative cover material is in a range between approximately 3 percent and approximately 8 percent.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the proportion of the sized rubber material added to the alternative cover material is based on an estimate of sulfate-containing material contained in the first feed stock component.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the proportion of the sized rubber material added to the initial volume is based on an estimate of sulfate-containing material contained in a landfill upon which the reformulated alternative cover material is to be used.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the proportion of the sized rubber material added to the initial volume is based on an perceived effectiveness of the reformulated alternative cover material and is in a range between approximately 1 percent and approximately 30 percent of the initial volume.

6. A reformulated alternative cover material for suppressing hydrogen sulfide release from landfills using recycled construction and demolition debris comprising:

a first feed stock comprising construction and demolition debris from which materials other than wood, roofing material, wallboard material, plaster, plaster board, and insulating board have been removed, the first feed stock being ground to a first desired particle size;

a second feed stock comprising at least one of masonry products, concrete, bricks, cinder block, rocks, asphalt that has been removed from the construction and demolition debris, the second feed stock being a ground to a second desired particle size; and

a third feed stock of sized rubber material, the third feed stock ground to a third desired particle size;

wherein the first and second feed stocks are blended in proportions of approximately 2:1 to approximately 5:1 by weight to create an initial volume of alternative cover material, and the third feed stock is added to the initial volume in a proportion greater than zero and less than approximately 50 percent of the initial volume to maintain permeability of the alternative cover material while absorbing hydrogen sulfide gas passing through the alternative cover material.

7. The reformulated alternative cover material of claim 6 , wherein the proportion of the third feed stock added to the initial volume is based on an estimate of wallboard material, plaster, and plaster board contained in the first feed stock.

8. The reformulated alternative cover material of claim 6 , wherein the proportion of the third feed stock added to the initial volume is based on an estimate of calcium sulfate containing material contained in a landfill upon which the reformulated alternative cover material is to be used.

9. The reformulated alternative cover material of claim 6 , wherein the proportion of the third feed stock added to the initial volume is in a range between approximately 3 percent and approximately 8 percent of the initial volume.

10. The reformulated alternative cover material of claim 6 , wherein the proportion of the third feed stock added to the initial volume is based on a perceived effectiveness of the reformulated alternative cover material and is in a range between approximately 1 percent and approximately 30 percent of the initial volume.

Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62540787 · Aug 3, 2017
Related Publication 20190039105A1 · Feb 7, 2019