IP Library Granted Patent US 10,909,453
Granted Patent B1
US 10,909,453 · App. 15/383,567 · Granted Feb 2, 2021

Method of controlling for undesired factors in machine learning models

Inventors: Jeffrey S. Myers (Normal, IL); Kenneth J. Sanchez (San Francisco, CA); Michael L. Bernico (Bloomington, IL)
Assignee: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
G06N3/08G06N20/00G06Q40/08
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,909,453
App. No.
15/383,567
Granted
Feb 2, 2021
Kind
B1
Abstract

A method of training and using a machine learning model that controls for consideration of undesired factors which might otherwise be considered by the trained model during its subsequent analyses of new data. For example, the model may be a neural network trained on a set of training images to evaluate an insurance applicant based upon an image or audio data of the insurance applicant as part of an underwriting process to determine an appropriate life or health insurance premium. The model is trained to probabilistically correlate an aspect of the applicant's appearance with a personal and/or health-related characteristic. Any undesired factors, such as age, sex, ethnicity, and/or race, are identified for exclusion. The trained model receives the image (e.g., a “selfie”) of the insurance applicant, analyzes the image without considering the identified undesired factors, and suggests the appropriate insurance premium based only on the remaining desired factors.

Claims (29)

1. A computer-implemented method of training and using a first machine learning model that controls for consideration of one or more undesired factors which might otherwise be considered by the first machine learning model when analyzing new data as part of an underwriting process to determine an appropriate insurance premium, the method comprising, via one or more processors:

training the first machine learning model using a first training data set that contains information including the one or more undesired factors;

training a second machine learning model using a second training data set that contains only the one or more undesired factors and one or more relevant interaction terms between the one or more undesired factors; and

combining the first machine learning model and the second machine learning model to eliminate a bias created by the one or more undesired factors from consideration by the first machine learning model prior to employing the first machine learning model to analyze the new data as part of the underwriting process to determine the appropriate insurance premium.

2. The computer-implemented method as set forth m claim 1 , wherein the first machine learning model is a neural network.

3. The computer-implemented method as set forth in claim 1 , wherein the second machine learning model is a linear model.

4. The computer-implemented method as set forth in claim 1 , wherein the new data includes a still image or a video recording of a person applying for life insurance or health insurance.

5. The computer-implemented method as set forth in claim 1 , wherein the new data includes an audio recording of a person applying for life insurance.

6. The computer-implemented method as set forth in claim 1 , wherein the new data includes an image of a piece of property for which a person is applying for property insurance.

7. The computer-implemented method as set forth in claim 1 , wherein the first machine learning model is further trained to analyze the new data as part of the underwriting process to determine one or more appropriate terms of coverage.

8. A computer system configured to train and use a first machine learning model that controls for consideration of one or more undesired factors which might otherwise be considered by the first machine learning model when analyzing new data as part of an underwriting process to determine an appropriate insurance premium, the computer system comprising one or more processors configured to:

train the first machine learning model using a training data set that contains information including the one or more undesired factors;

train a second machine learning model using a second training data set that contains only the one or more undesired factors and one or more relevant interaction terms between the one or more undesired factors; and

combine the first machine learning model and the second machine learning model to eliminate a bias created by the one or more undesired factors from consideration by the first machine learning model prior to employing the first machine learning model to analyze the new data as part of the underwriting process to determine the appropriate insurance premium.

9. The computer system as set forth in claim 8 , wherein the first machine learning model is a neural network.

10. The computer system as set forth in claim 8 , wherein the second machine learning model is a linear model.

11. The computer system as set forth in claim 8 , wherein the new data includes a still image or a video recording of a person applying for life insurance or health insurance.

12. The computer system as set forth in claim 8 , wherein the new data includes an audio recording of a person applying for life insurance.

13. The computer system as set forth in claim 8 , wherein the new data includes an image of a piece of property for which a person is applying for property insurance.

14. The computer system as set forth in claim 8 , wherein the machine learning model is further trained to analyze the new data as part of the underwriting process to determine one or more appropriate terms of coverage.

15. A computer-implemented method of training and using a machine learning model that controls for consideration of one or more undesired factors which might otherwise be considered by the machine learning model when analyzing new data as part of an underwriting process to determine an appropriate insurance premium, the method comprising, via one or more processors:

training the machine learning model using a first training data set that contains information including the one or more undesired factors;

training the machine learning model using a second training data set that contains only the one or more undesired factors and one or more relevant interaction terms between the one or more undesired factors to identify the one or more undesired factors and the one or more relevant interaction terms between the one or more undesired factors; and

instructing the machine learning model to not consider the identified one or more undesired factors while analyzing the new data as part of the underwriting process to determine the appropriate insurance premium.

16. The computer-implemented method as set forth in claim 15 , wherein the machine learning model is a neural network.

17. The computer-implemented method as set forth in claim 15 , wherein the new data includes a still image or a video recording of a person applying for life insurance or health insurance.

18. The computer-implemented method as set forth in claim 15 , wherein the new data includes an audio recording of a person applying for life insurance.

19. The computer-implemented method as set forth in claim 15 , wherein the new data includes an image of a piece of property for which a person is applying for property insurance.

20. The computer-implemented method as set forth in claim 15 , wherein the machine learning model is further trained to analyze the new data as part of the underwriting process to determine one or more appropriate terms of coverage.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 9, 2017
From: SANCHEZ, KENNETH J.; BERNICO, MICHAEL L.; MYERS, JEFFREY S.
To: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Reel/Frame 041530/0971 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62272184 · Dec 29, 2015
Provisional Application 62273624 · Dec 31, 2015
Cited By (16)
US 12,198,396 US 12,216,610 US 12,223,428 US 12,236,689 US 12,307,350 US 12,346,816 US 12,367,405 US 12,455,739 US 12,462,575 US 12,522,243 US 12,536,131 US 12,554,467 US 12,591,240 US 12,618,976 US 12,623,691 US 12,709,294