QCI change via bearer release and reestablishment
A core network element, such as a PCRF and/or an MME, can determine that a Quality of Service (QoS) Class Indicator (QCI) of particular bearer set up between the core network and user equipment (UE) should be changed to a new QCI. When a control node, such as the MME, determines that no teardown delay conditions are met, the control node can send a bearer release message to a base station that instructs the base station to tear down all bearers for the UE, even if they are in use. In a dual connectivity arrangement, such as a E-UTRAN New Radio-Dual Connectivity (EN-DC) configuration, the base station can instruct a secondary base station to also release all bearers for the UE. The control node can instruct the base station to reestablish the particular bearer with the new QCI when the base station reestablishes the bearers for the UE.
1. A method comprising:
determining, by a control node of a core network, that a particular bearer of one or more bearers set up for a user equipment (UE) is to be modified from having a first Quality of Service (QoS) Class Indicator (QCI) to having a second QCI;
determining, by the control node, whether at least one of teardown delay conditions are met;
in response to determining that the particular bearer of the one or more bearers set up for the UE is to be modified from having the first QCI to the second QCI and that no teardown delay conditions are met, sending, by the control node, a bearer release message to a base station connected to the UE, wherein the bearer release message instructs the base station to tear down the one or more bearers for the UE and at least one of the teardown delay conditions indicates that the bearer release message should not be sent while one of the one or more bearers has a third QCI value; and
instructing, by the control node, the base station to reestablish the particular bearer with the second QCI when the base station reestablishes the one or more bearers for the UE.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein:
the base station is a master node connected to a second base station serving as a secondary node, the one or more bearers are connected between the UE and at least one gateway of the core network through both the master node and the secondary node, the bearer release message additionally instructs the master node to instruct the secondary node to tear down the one or more bearers, and the instructing includes causing the master node to instruct the secondary node to reestablish the particular bearer with the second QCI when the secondary node reestablishes the one or more bearers for the UE.
3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the base station is an LTE evolved NodeB (eNB) and the second base station is a 5G gNB.
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more bearers are E-UTRAN Radio Access Bearers (E-RABs) that are established between a gateway of the core network and the UE.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein at least one of the teardown delay conditions indicates that the bearer release message should not be sent while one of the one or more bearers is connecting the UE to a particular access point name (APN).
6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
receiving, by the control node, QoS parameters that originated from at least one of a Home Subscriber Server (HSS) or a Policy and Charging Rules Function (PCRF), wherein the determining, by the control node, that the particular bearer is to be modified from having the first QCI to having the second QCI is based on the QoS parameters.
7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
receiving an indication, by the control node, that a subscriber account associated with the UE has reached a monthly data limit, wherein the determining, by the control node, that the particular bearer is to be modified from having the first QCI to having the second QCI is performed in response to determining that the subscriber account has reached the monthly data limit, and wherein the second QCI is associated with a lower priority level than the first QCI.
8. A control node of a core network, comprising:
one or more processors;
a communication connection configured to connect to a base station over a control plane interface, wherein one or more bearers are set up through the base station between the core network and a user equipment (UE); and
memory storing computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the control node to perform operations comprising:
determining that a particular bearer of the one or more bearers is to be modified from having a first Quality of Service (QoS) Class Indicator (QCI) to having a second QCI;
determining whether at least one of teardown delay conditions are met;
in response to determining that the particular bearer of the one or more bearers is to be modified from having the first QCI to the second QCI and that no teardown delay conditions are met, sending a bearer release message to the base station that instructs the base station to tear down the one or more bearers for the UE, wherein at least one of the teardown delay conditions indicates that the bearer release message should not be sent while one of the one or more bearers has a third QCI value; and
causing the particular bearer to be reestablished by the base station with the second QCI when the base station reestablishes the one or more bearers for the UE.
9. The control node of claim 8 , wherein:
the base station is a master node connected to a second base station serving as a secondary node, the one or more bearers are connected between the UE and at least one gateway of the core network through both the master node and the secondary node, the bearer release message additionally instructs the master node to instruct the secondary node to tear down the one or more bearers, and the causing includes causing the master node to instruct the secondary node to reestablish the particular bearer with the second QCI when the secondary node reestablishes the one or more bearers for the UE.
10. The control node of claim 8 , wherein at least one of the teardown delay conditions indicates that the bearer release message should not be sent while one of the one or more bearers is connecting the UE to a particular access point name (APN).
11. The control node of claim 8 , the operations further comprising:
receiving QoS parameters that originated from at least one of a Home Subscriber Server (HSS) or a Policy and Charging Rules Function (PCRF), wherein the determining that the particular bearer is to be modified from having the first QCI to having the second QCI is based on the QoS parameters.
12. The control node of claim 8 , the operations further comprising:
receiving an indication that a subscriber account associated with the UE has reached a monthly data limit, wherein the determining that the particular bearer is to be modified from having the first QCI to having the second QCI is performed in response to determining that the subscriber account has reached the monthly data limit, and wherein the second QCI is associated with a lower priority level than the first QCI.
13. One or more non-transitory computer-readable media storing computer-executable instructions that, when executed by one or more processors of a control node of core network, cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising:
determining that a particular bearer of one or more bearers set up for a user equipment (UE) is to be modified from having a first Quality of Service (QoS) Class Indicator (QCI) to having a second QCI;
determining whether at least one of teardown delay conditions are met;
in response to determining that the particular bearer of the one or more bearers set up for the UE is to be modified from having the first QCI to the second QCI and that no teardown delay conditions are met, sending a bearer release message to a base station connected to the UE, wherein the bearer release message instructs the base station to tear down the one or more bearers for the UE and at least one of the teardown delay conditions indicates that the bearer release message should not be sent while one of the one or more bearers has a third QCI value; and
instructing the base station to reestablish the particular bearer with the second QCI when the base station reestablishes the one or more bearers for the UE.
14. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 13 , wherein: the base station is a master node connected to a second base station serving as a secondary node, the one or more bearers are connected between the UE and at least one gateway of the core network through both the master node and the secondary node, the bearer release message additionally instructs the master node to instruct the secondary node to tear down the one or more bearers, and the instructing includes causing the master node to instruct the secondary node to reestablish the particular bearer with the second QCI when the secondary node reestablishes the one or more bearers for the UE.
15. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 13 , wherein at least one of the teardown delay conditions indicates that the bearer release message should not be sent while one of the one or more bearers is connecting the UE to a particular access point name (APN).
16. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 13 , the operations further comprising: receiving QoS parameters that originated from at least one of a Home Subscriber Server (HSS) or a Policy and Charging Rules Function (PCRF), wherein the determining that the particular bearer is to be modified from having the first QCI to having the second QCI is based on the QoS parameters.
17. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 13 , the operations further comprising: receiving an indication that a subscriber account associated with the UE has reached a monthly data limit, wherein the determining that the particular bearer is to be modified from having the first QCI to having the second QCI is performed in response to determining that the subscriber account has reached the monthly data limit, and wherein the second QCI is associated with a lower priority level than the first QCI.