IP Library Granted Patent US 11,183,849
Granted Patent B1
US 11,183,849 · App. 17/154,428 · Granted Nov 23, 2021

Control of power converter based on dynamic constraint factors

Inventors: Graeme G. Mackay (Austin, TX); Ajit Sharma (Austin, TX); Jason W. Lawrence (Austin, TX); Eric J. King (Austin, TX)
Assignee: Cirrus Logic, Inc.
H02J3/32H02J3/16H02J7/0068H02J2207/20
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,183,849
App. No.
17/154,428
Granted
Nov 23, 2021
Kind
B1
Abstract

A power delivery system may include a power converter configured to electrically couple to a power source and further configured to supply electrical energy to one or more loads electrically coupled to an output of the power converter, and control circuitry configured to select a constraint factor from a plurality of different constraint factors based on at least one of an input voltage to the power converter and a power level available to the power converter, and control the power converter in accordance with the constraint factor.

Claims (312)

1. A power delivery system, comprising:

a power converter configured to electrically couple to a power source and further configured to supply electrical energy to one or more loads electrically coupled to an output of the power converter; and

control circuitry configured to:

select a constraint factor from a plurality of different constraint factors based on at least one of an input voltage to the power converter and a power level available to the power converter; and

control the power converter in accordance with the constraint factor.

2. The power delivery system of claim 1 , wherein:

the power source is a battery, and the control circuitry is configured to select the constraint factor based on a voltage level available from the battery.

3. The power delivery system of claim 2 , wherein the control circuitry models the voltage level available from the battery as a time-varying voltage source in series with an equivalent resistance.

4. The power delivery system of claim 2 , wherein:

a plurality of constraint regions are defined for different ranges of the voltage level available from the battery; and

the control circuitry is configured to select the constraint factor based on a constraint region of the plurality of constraint regions corresponding to the voltage level available from the battery.

5. The power delivery system of claim 4 , wherein a first constraint region of the plurality of constraint regions is associated with a first constraint factor which corresponds to a battery-imposed limitation on maximum current.

6. The power delivery system of claim 5 , wherein the first constraint region commences at a critical end-of-discharge voltage for the battery.

7. The power delivery system of claim 5 , wherein the first constraint factor sets a maximum current limit for the power converter defined by:

I

CELL

-

MAX

=

V

C

E

L

L

-

E

F

F

-

V

CELL

-

MIN

R

0

where V CELL-EFF is an effective battery voltage at a given instance, V CELL-MIN is the critical end-of-discharge voltage for the battery, and R 0 is an equivalent series resistance of the battery.

8. The power delivery system of claim 4 , wherein a second constraint region of the plurality of constraint regions is associated with a second constraint factor which corresponds to a power converter stability-imposed limitation on maximum current.

9. The power delivery system of claim 8 , wherein the second constraint factor sets a maximum current limit for the power converter defined by:

I

PMAX

=

V

C

E

L

L

-

E

F

F

2

(

R

0

+

R

T

R

A

C

E

+

R

S

N

S

+

R

L

O

S

S

)

where R 0 is an equivalent series resistance of the battery, R TRACE is a resistance of a trace and/or connector resistance between the power source and the power converter, R SNS is a resistance of a current sense resistor, and R LOSS is a resistance modeling losses of the power converter.

10. The power delivery system of claim 8 , wherein:

a first constraint region of the plurality of constraint regions is associated with a first constraint factor which corresponds to a battery-imposed limitation on maximum current; and

the second constraint region commences at an intersection of the first constraint factor and the second constraint factor.

11. The power delivery system of claim 4 , wherein a third constraint region of the plurality of constraint regions is associated with a third constraint factor which corresponds to an output-power-based limitation on maximum current.

12. The power delivery system of claim 11 , wherein the third constraint factor sets a maximum current limit for the power converter defined by:

I

CELL

-

LIM

=

I

PMAX

-

P

MAX

-

P

LIM

R

0

+

R

TRACE

+

R

SNS

+

R

LOSS

where I PMAX is a maximum current limit as defined for a second constraint factor, P MAX is a maximum power delivery capability of the power converter, P LIM is an output power limit defined for the power converter, R 0 is an equivalent series resistance of the battery, R TRACE is a resistance of a trace and/or connector resistance between the power source and the power converter, R SNS is a resistance of a current sense resistor, and R LOSS is a resistance modeling losses of the power converter.

13. The power delivery system of claim 12 , wherein a second constraint region of the plurality of constraint regions is associated with the second constraint factor which corresponds to a power converter stability-imposed limitation on maximum current.

14. The power delivery system of claim 11 , wherein:

a second constraint region of the plurality of constraint regions is associated with a second constraint factor which corresponds to a power converter stability-imposed limitation on maximum current; and

the third constraint region commences at a breakpoint between the second constraint factor and the third constraint factor.

15. The power delivery system of claim 4 , wherein a fourth constraint region of the plurality of constraint regions is associated with a fourth constraint factor which corresponds to a fixed current limit.

16. The power delivery system of claim 4 , wherein:

a second constraint region of the plurality of constraint regions is associated with a second constraint factor which corresponds to a power converter stability-imposed limitation on maximum current;

a third constraint region of the plurality of constraint regions is associated with a third constraint factor which corresponds to an output-power-based limitation on maximum current; and

the fourth constraint region is located between the second constraint region and the third constraint region.

17. The power delivery system of claim 4 , wherein the plurality of constraint regions includes:

a first constraint region associated with a first constraint factor which corresponds to a battery-imposed limitation on maximum current;

a second constraint region with a second constraint factor which corresponds to a power converter stability-imposed limitation on maximum current;

a third constraint region associated with a third constraint factor which corresponds to an output-power-based limitation on maximum current; and

a fourth constraint region associated with a fourth constraint factor which corresponds to a fixed current limit.

18. The power delivery system of claim 1 , wherein the constraint factor defines a current limit to be drawn from the power source.

19. A power converter configured to:

receive an input voltage from a voltage source and to generate an output voltage; and

operate in a plurality of operating regions wherein a maximum current drawn by the power converter in each operating region of the plurality of operating regions is defined by a constraint factor corresponding to such operating region.

20. A power delivery system, comprising:

a power converter configured to receive an input voltage from a power source and to generate an output voltage; and

control circuitry configured to:

calculate a plurality of current limit values, each current limit value of the plurality of current limit values corresponding to a constraint factor; and

control the power converter based on a current limit selected as a lowest of the plurality of current limit values.

21. The power delivery system of claim 20 , wherein the constraint factors comprise one or more of:

a power-source-imposed limitation on maximum current;

a maximum-stable-power imposed limitation on maximum current;

a practical-power-limit-imposed limitation on maximum current; and

a practical-current-limit-imposed limitation on maximum current.

22. A method, comprising, in a power converter configured to electrically couple to a power source and further configured to supply electrical energy to one or more loads electrically coupled to an output of the power converter:

selecting a constraint factor from a plurality of different constraint factors based on at least one of an input voltage to the power converter and a power level available to the power converter; and

controlling the power converter in accordance with the constraint factor.

23. The method of claim 22 , wherein:

the power source is a battery, and the control circuitry is configured to select the constraint factor based on a voltage level available from the battery.

24. The method of claim 23 , wherein the control circuitry models the voltage level available from the battery as a time-varying voltage source in series with an equivalent resistance.

25. The method of claim 23 , wherein:

a plurality of constraint regions are defined for different ranges of the voltage level available from the battery; and

the control circuitry is configured to select the constraint factor based on a constraint region of the plurality of constraint regions corresponding to the voltage level available from the battery.

26. The method of claim 25 , wherein a first constraint region of the plurality of constraint regions is associated with a first constraint factor which corresponds to a battery-imposed limitation on maximum current.

27. The method of claim 26 , wherein the first constraint region commences at a critical end-of-discharge voltage for the battery.

28. The method of claim 26 , wherein the first constraint factor sets a maximum current limit for the power converter defined by:

I

C

ELL

-

MAX

=

V

C

E

L

L

-

E

F

F

-

V

C

ELL

-

MIN

R

0

where V CELL-EFF is an effective battery voltage at a given instance, V CELL-MIN is the critical end-of-discharge voltage for the battery, and R 0 is an equivalent series resistance of the battery.

29. The method of claim 25 , wherein a second constraint region of the plurality of constraint regions is associated with a second constraint factor which corresponds to a power converter stability-imposed limitation on maximum current.

30. The method of claim 29 , wherein the second constraint factor sets a maximum current limit for the power converter defined by:

I

PMAX

=

V

C

E

L

L

-

E

F

F

2

(

R

0

+

R

T

R

A

C

E

+

R

S

N

S

+

R

L

O

S

S

)

where R 0 is an equivalent series resistance of the battery, R TRACE is a resistance of a trace and/or connector resistance between the power source and the power converter, R SNS is a resistance of a current sense resistor, and R LOSS is a resistance modeling losses of the power converter.

31. The method of claim 29 , wherein:

a first constraint region of the plurality of constraint regions is associated with a first constraint factor which corresponds to a battery-imposed limitation on maximum current; and

the second constraint region commences at an intersection of the first constraint factor and the second constraint factor.

32. The method of claim 25 , wherein a third constraint region of the plurality of constraint regions is associated with a third constraint factor which corresponds to an output-power-based limitation on maximum current.

33. The method of claim 32 , wherein the third constraint factor sets a maximum current limit for the power converter defined by:

I

C

ELL

-

LIM

=

I

PMAX

-

P

MAX

-

P

LIM

R

0

+

R

TRACE

+

R

SNS

+

R

LOSS

where I PMAX is a maximum current limit as defined for a second constraint factor, P MAX is a maximum power delivery capability of the power converter, P LIM is an output power limit defined for the power converter, R 0 is an equivalent series resistance of the battery, R TRACE is a resistance of a trace and/or connector resistance between the power source and the power converter, R SNS is a resistance of a current sense resistor, and R LOSS is a resistance modeling losses of the power converter.

34. The method of claim 33 , wherein a second constraint region of the plurality of constraint regions is associated with the second constraint factor which corresponds to a power converter stability-imposed limitation on maximum current.

35. The method of claim 32 , wherein:

a second constraint region of the plurality of constraint regions is associated with a second constraint factor which corresponds to a power converter stability-imposed limitation on maximum current; and

the third constraint region commences at a breakpoint between the second constraint factor and the third constraint factor.

36. The method of claim 25 , wherein a fourth constraint region of the plurality of constraint regions is associated with a fourth constraint factor which corresponds to a fixed current limit.

37. The method of claim 25 , wherein:

a second constraint region of the plurality of constraint regions is associated with a second constraint factor which corresponds to a power converter stability-imposed limitation on maximum current;

a third constraint region of the plurality of constraint regions is associated with a third constraint factor which corresponds to an output-power-based limitation on maximum current; and

the fourth constraint region is located between the second constraint region and the third constraint region.

38. The method of claim 25 , wherein the plurality of constraint regions includes:

a first constraint region associated with a first constraint factor which corresponds to a battery-imposed limitation on maximum current;

a second constraint region with a second constraint factor which corresponds to a power converter stability-imposed limitation on maximum current;

a third constraint region associated with a third constraint factor which corresponds to an output-power-based limitation on maximum current; and

a fourth constraint region associated with a fourth constraint factor which corresponds to a fixed current limit.

39. The method of claim 22 , wherein the constraint factor defines a current limit to be drawn from the power source.

40. A method comprising:

receiving an input voltage from a voltage source and generating an output voltage; and

operating in a plurality of operating regions wherein a maximum current drawn by the power converter in each operating region of the plurality of operating regions is defined by a constraint factor corresponding to such operating region.

41. A method, in a system having a power converter configured to receive an input voltage from a power source and to generate an output voltage, the method comprising:

calculating a plurality of current limit values, each current limit value of the plurality of current limit values corresponding to a constraint factor; and

controlling the power converter based on a current limit selected as a lowest of the plurality of current limit values.

42. The method of claim 41 , wherein the constraint factors comprise one or more of:

a power-source-imposed limitation on maximum current;

a maximum-stable-power imposed limitation on maximum current;

a practical-power-limit-imposed limitation on maximum current; and

a practical-current-limit-imposed limitation on maximum current.

43. A device comprising:

one or more components;

a power converter configured to deliver electrical energy to the one or more components; and

a control circuit for controlling a current associated with the power converter, the control circuit comprising:

threshold-based control circuitry configured to control the current based on at least a peak current threshold level for the current and a valley current threshold level for the current; and

timer-based control circuitry configured to control the current based on a duration of time that the power converter spends in a switching state of the power converter.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 29, 2021
From: CIRRUS LOGIC INTERNATIONAL SEMICONDUCTOR LTD.
To: CIRRUS LOGIC, INC.
Reel/Frame 057644/0778 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 28, 2021
From: CIRRUS LOGIC INTERNATIONAL SEMICONDUCTOR LTD.
To: CIRRUS LOGIC, INC.
Reel/Frame 057628/0631 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 21, 2021
From: MACKAY, GRAEME G.; SHARMA, AJIT; LAWRENCE, JASON W.; KING, ERIC J.
To: CIRRUS LOGIC INTERNATIONAL SEMICONDUCTOR LTD.
Reel/Frame 054986/0238 →
Continuity (1)
Provisional Application 63058014 · Jul 29, 2020