IP Library Granted Patent US 11,459,112
Granted Patent B2
US 11,459,112 · App. 16/517,237 · Granted Oct 4, 2022

Active aircraft probe heat monitor and method of use

Inventors: Vincent R. LoPresto (Eagan, MN); Weston D. C. Heuer (Maple Grove, MN)
Assignee: Rosemount Aerospace Inc.
B64D15/22B64D15/12G01K1/20G01P5/165G01P13/025
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,459,112
App. No.
16/517,237
Granted
Oct 4, 2022
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method including providing power to an aircraft probe anti-ice system, monitoring an actual power demand of the aircraft probe anti-ice system, monitoring an air data parameter and atmospheric conditions surrounding an aircraft and calculating an expected power demand of the aircraft probe anti-ice system based on the air data parameters and the atmospheric conditions, comparing the actual power demand of the aircraft probe anti-ice system to the expected power demand, and performing a corrective action if the actual power demand and the expected power demand are different by more than an acceptable amount.

Claims (25)

1. A method comprising:

providing power to an aircraft probe anti-ice system;

monitoring an actual power demand of the aircraft probe anti-ice system;

calculating an expected power demand of the aircraft probe anti-ice system based on air data parameters and the atmospheric conditions;

comparing the actual power demand of the aircraft probe anti-ice system to the expected power demand; and

performing a corrective action if the actual power demand and the expected power demand are different by more than a selected amount, wherein the corrective action includes removing an aircraft probe data from a voting arrangement, wherein the voting arrangement includes data from at least one other aircraft data probe.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising monitoring the air data parameters and atmospheric conditions surrounding the aircraft.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the air data parameters include airspeed, total air temperature, altitude, angle of attack, and angle of sideslip.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the atmospheric conditions include temperature, ice water content and liquid water content.

5. The method of claim 2 , wherein the anti-ice system includes a self-compensating heater.

6. The method of claim 2 , wherein the corrective action includes changing the power supplied to the anti-ice system.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein changing the power supplied to the anti-ice system includes increasing the power supplied.

8. The method of claim 6 , wherein changing the power supplied to the anti-ice system includes decreasing the power supplied.

9. The method of claim 2 , wherein the corrective action includes removing an aircraft probe.

10. The method of claim 2 , wherein the corrective action includes notifying the pilots and/or aircraft systems that the subject aircraft probe data may not be reliable.

11. A system comprising:

a device having a first surface configured to be exposed to airflow about an exterior of an aircraft, the device including a first self-compensating heater configured to heat the first surface;

at least one current monitor configured to produce a first measurement value representing electrical current flow in and out of the first self-compensating heater;

one or more processors; and

computer-readable memory encoded with instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the system to:

receive air data parameters and atmospheric conditions surrounding the aircraft;

calculate an expected power demand of the self-compensating heater based on the air data parameters and the atmospheric conditions;

compare the actual power demand of the self-compensating heater to the expected power demand; and

perform a corrective action if the actual power demand and the expected power demand are different by more than an acceptable amount, wherein the corrective action includes removing an aircraft probe data from a voting arrangement, wherein the voting arrangement includes data from at least one other device.

12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the device is an air data probe.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 13, 2020
From: LOPRESTO, VINCENT R.; HEUER, WESTON D. C.
To: ROSEMOUNT AEROSPACE INC.
Reel/Frame 051500/0327 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20210016886A1 · Jan 21, 2021