IP Library Granted Patent US 11,488,721
Granted Patent B2
US 11,488,721 · App. 16/825,943 · Granted Nov 1, 2022

Operatively tuning implants for increased performance

Inventors: Jason K. Otto (Plantation, FL); Brian W. McKinnon (Arlington, TN); Mark Ellsworth Nadzadi (Memphis, TN)
Assignee: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
G16H50/50A61B5/103A61B5/4528A61B5/4824A61B34/10B33Y50/00B33Y80/00G16B5/00G16H20/30G16H20/40G16H30/20A61B5/4533A61B5/6878A61B2034/108A61F2/38A61F2002/3096A61F2002/30943A61F2002/30955
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,488,721
App. No.
16/825,943
Filed
Mar 20, 2020
Granted
Nov 1, 2022
Kind
B2
Examiner
MAPAR, BIJAN
Art Unit
2147
USPC
703/11
Abstract

A method for preoperatively characterizing an individual patient's biomechanic function in preparation of implanting a prosthesis is provided. The method includes subjecting a patient to various activities, recording relative positions of anatomy during said various activities, measuring force environments responsive to said patient's anatomy and affected area during said various activities, characterizing the patient's biomechanic function from said relative positions and corresponding force environments, inputting the measured force environments, relative positions of knee anatomy, and patient's biomechanic function characterization into one or more computer simulation models, inputting a computer model of the prosthesis into said one or more computer simulation models, and manipulating the placement of the prosthesis in the computer simulation using said patient's biomechanic function characterization and said computer model of the prosthesis to approximate a preferred biomechanical fit of the prosthesis.

Claims (26)

1. A process for selecting prosthetic implant parameters optimized to a particular patient's biomechanical characterization, comprising:

obtaining, from at least one of a CT device, an MRI device, a radiological device, an ultrasound device and an X-ray device, image data of a patient joint;

deriving, using a computing device, from the image data, a plurality of dimensions including at least one dimension that includes at least one of anatomic landmark data and soft tissue attachment data of the patient joint;

executing, using the computer device, a plurality of simulations of a joint model approximating the patient joint, based on the plurality of dimensions, having one or more a prosthetic implant components with size and position variables relative to the plurality of dimensions, wherein the joint model undergoes a motion profile associated with a selected patient activity and at least one of the size and position variables differs with each simulation; and

calculating, from the plurality of simulations, and outputting by the computing device a recommendation of at least one of implant size, implant position, and ligamentous releases.

2. The process of claim 1 , wherein the step of obtaining image data of the patient comprises performing an anatomical scan of the patient.

3. The process of claim 2 , further comprising the step of extracting the anatomic landmark data from the anatomical scan to create a bone model of the patient or a patient population.

4. The process of claim 3 , further comprising the step of re-orienting or scaling the bone model by at least one dimension.

5. The process of claim 4 , wherein the step of re-orienting or scaling the bone model by at least one dimension comprises aligning the bone model with a standard reference frame and scale.

6. The process of claim 3 , further comprising importing the bone model into a CAD software package.

7. The process of claim 3 , further comprising the step of subjecting the bone model to a segmentation filter.

8. The process of claim 1 , further comprising the step of determining the mechanical axis.

9. The process of claim 1 , wherein the method further includes the step of determining at least one cutting plane for a patient's bone.

10. A method for selecting prosthetic implant parameters optimized for a particular patient, the method comprising:

receiving, from at least one of a CT device, an MRI device, a radiological device, an ultrasound device and an X-ray device, image data of a patient joint;

deriving, using a computing device, from the image data, a plurality of dimensions including at least one dimension that includes at least one of bone morphology data and soft tissue attachment data of the patient joint;

executing, using the computer device, a plurality of simulations of a joint model approximating the patient joint, based on plurality of dimensions having one or more a prosthetic implant components with size and position variables relative to the plurality of dimensions, wherein the joint model undergoes a motion profile associated with a selected patient activity and at least one of the size and position variables differs with each simulation; and

calculating, from the plurality of simulations, and outputting by the computing device a recommendation of at least one of implant size, implant position, and ligamentous releases.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the step of receiving image data of the patient comprises performing an anatomical scan of the patient.

12. The method of claim 11 , further comprising the step of extracting anatomic landmark data from the anatomical scan to create a bone model of the patient or a patient population.

13. The method of claim 12 , further comprising the step of re-orienting or scaling the bone model by at least one dimension.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the step of re-orienting or scaling the bone model by at least one dimension comprises aligning the bone model with u standard reference frame and scale.

15. The method of claim 12 , further comprising importing the bone model into a CAD software package.

16. The method of claim 12 , further comprising the step of subjecting the bone model to a segmentation filter.

17. The method of claim 10 , further comprising the step of determining the mechanical axis.

18. The method of claim 10 , wherein the method further includes the step of determining cutting planes for a patient's bone.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 14, 2020
From: OTTO, JASON K.; MCKINNON, BRIAN W.; NADZADI, MARK E.
To: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
Reel/Frame 052394/0476 →
Continuity (5)
Continuation 15088697 · Apr 1, 2016
Continuation 13951009 · Jul 25, 2013
Continuation 13302256 · Nov 22, 2011
Continuation 12234444 · Aug 19, 2008
Related Publication 20200219626A1 · Jul 9, 2020
Cited By (9)
US 12,193,751 US 12,213,885 US 12,307,658 US 12,383,334 US 12,433,677 US 12,471,993 US 12,636,084 US 12,653,617 US 12,653,618