IP Library › Granted Patent US 11,526,857
Granted Patent B1
US 11,526,857 · App. 17/181,198 · Granted Dec 13, 2022

Financial security indicator

Inventors: Alexis M. Eidson (San Antonio, TX); Christina N. Nickel (Boerne, TX); Matthew Quagliara (San Antonio, TX); Raymond John Zurcher (San Antonio, TX); Ronald Romanowski (San Antonio, TX)
Assignee: UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION (USAA)
G06Q20/10H04L67/52H04L67/535
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,526,857
App. No.
17/181,198
Granted
Dec 13, 2022
Kind
B1
Abstract

A method, apparatus and system are disclosed for providing a user with an indication of the user's financial security level. In order to achieve this, the user may be surveyed to provide information related to the user's attributes and current level of financial security. Based on the user's inputs, a financial security tool may generate a financial security score and monetary risk amount that provides an accurate interpretation of the user's financial security level.

Claims (46)

1. A method for providing guidance to a user, the method comprising:

initiating monitoring, by a processor, of a suggested modification for a recurring event to improve a user security score;

determining, by the processor, an expected occurrence of the recurring event based on a timing parameter;

receiving and updating, by the processor, a current location of the remote user device;

comparing, by the processor, the current location of the remote user device to a location parameter to determine whether the current location of the remote user device is within range of a target location; and

automatically initiating, by the processor, a funds transfer equal to a purchase transaction after a specified time interval has elapsed based on a determination that the remote user device was not within the range of the target location during the specified time interval or the recurring event did not occur during the specified time interval.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

analyzing, by the processor, a historical dataset of the user to identify the recurring event, wherein the recurring event is modeled as an event type and a set of contextual parameters, where the event type comprises the purchase transaction and the set of contextual parameters comprises the timing parameter, the location parameter for the target location, and the purchase amount; and

determining, by the processor, the suggested modification for modifying the recurring event to improve the user security score.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein monitoring the suggested modification further comprises:

transmitting a confirmation message to the remote user device after the specified time interval has elapsed based on a determination that the remote user device was not within the range of the target location during the specified time interval.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein monitoring the suggested modification further comprises:

periodically transmitting, by the processor, user location requests to the remote user device that activates GPS circuitry on the remote user device for the specified time interval starting before the expected occurrence and ending after the expected occurrence;

analyzing current user data when the remote user device is within range of the target location during the specified time interval to determine whether the event type occurred; and

transmitting a confirmation message to the remote user device after the specified time interval has elapsed based on a determination that the event type did not occur during the specified time interval.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the suggested modification comprises a progress parameter for the recurring event in the suggested modification; and

monitoring the suggested modification further comprises:

analyzing current user data when the remote user device is within range of the target location to determine whether the event type occurred; and

updating the progress parameter based on a determination that the event type did occur.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein monitoring the suggested modification further comprises transmitting a revised suggested modification to the remote user device based on a determination that the event type did occur.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the funds are transferred from a checking account of the user to another account of the user.

8. An apparatus for providing guidance to a user, the apparatus comprising:

a memory; and

a processor in communication with the memory, the processor configured execute instructions stored in the memory and to:

initiate monitoring of a suggested modification for a recurring event to improve a user security score;

determine an expected occurrence of the recurring event based on a timing parameter;

receive and update a current location of the remote user device;

compare the current location of the remote user device to a location parameter to determine whether the current location of the remote user device is within range of a target location; and

automatically initiate a funds transfer equal to a purchase transaction after a specified time interval has elapsed based on a determination that the remote user device was not within the range of the target location during the specified time interval or the recurring event did not occur during the specified time interval.

9. The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

analyze a historical dataset of the user to identify the recurring event, wherein the recurring event is modeled as an event type and a set of contextual parameters, where the event type comprises the purchase transaction and the set of contextual parameters comprises the timing parameter, the location parameter for the target location, and the purchase amount; and

determine the suggested modification for modifying the recurring event to improve the user security score.

10. The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein to monitor the suggested modification, the processor is further configured to:

transmit a confirmation message to the remote user device after the specified time interval has elapsed based on a determination that the remote user device was not within the range of the target location during the specified time interval.

11. The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein to monitor the suggested modification, the processor is further configured to:

periodically transmit user location requests to the remote user device that activate GPS circuitry on the remote user device for the specified time interval starting before the expected occurrence and ending after the expected occurrence;

analyze current user data when the remote user device is within range of the target location during the specified time interval to determine whether the event type occurred; and

transmit a confirmation message to the remote user device after the specified time interval has elapsed based on a determination that the event type did not occur during the specified time interval.

12. The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein:

the suggested modification comprises a progress parameter for the recurring event in the suggested modification; and

to monitoring the suggested modification, the processor is further configured to:

analyze current user data when the remote user device is within range of the target location to determine whether the event type occurred; and

update the progress parameter based on a determination that the event type did occur.

13. The apparatus of claim 12 , wherein the processor is further configured to transmit a revised suggested modification to the remote user device based on a determination that the event type did occur.

14. The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein the funds are transferred from a checking account of the user to another account of the user.

Continuity (3)
Continuation 15211874 · Jul 15, 2016
Continuation In Part 14284132 · May 21, 2014
Continuation 13833182 · Mar 15, 2013
Cited By (1)
US 12,586,139