IP Library Granted Patent US 11,557,271
Granted Patent B2
US 11,557,271 · App. 16/680,089 · Granted Jan 17, 2023

Degenerative sound isolation device

Inventors: Xiaoshi Su (Ann Arbor, MI); Debasish Banerjee (Ann Arbor, MI); Yuji Shintaku (Toyota, JP); Katsuhiko Nakajima (Nisshin, JP)
Assignees: Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc.; Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
G10K11/162B60R13/08
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,557,271
App. No.
16/680,089
Granted
Jan 17, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

A sound isolation device includes at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer having a plurality of channels. The plurality of channels may include three or more channels. The channels have an open end and a terminal end, wherein the terminal ends of the channels are separate from one another. The at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer has an acoustic monopole response and an acoustic dipole response that have a substantially similar resonant frequency.

Claims (38)

1. A sound isolation device comprising:

at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer having a plurality of channels, the plurality of channels each have an open end and a terminal end, the terminal ends of the plurality of channels being separate from each other; and

wherein the at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer has an acoustic monopole response and an acoustic dipole response, wherein the acoustic dipole response and the acoustic monopole response of the at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer have a resonant frequency that is substantially similar.

2. The sound isolation device of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of channels includes at least three channels.

3. The sound isolation device of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of channels includes at least four channels.

4. The sound isolation device of claim 3 , wherein an absorption coefficient that the at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer absorbs sound at the resonant frequency is substantially similar when either (a) at least one of the plurality of channels is aligned parallel along a wave propagation direction of the sound or (b) at least one of the plurality of channels is aligned perpendicular along a wave propagation direction of the sound.

5. The sound isolation device of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of channels are in a zigzag formation.

6. The sound isolation device of claim 1 , wherein a cross section along a width of the at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer defines a symmetrical shape having at least one line of symmetry, the symmetrical shape having an outer perimeter, wherein the open end of the plurality of channels are adjacent to the outer perimeter.

7. The sound isolation device of claim 1 , wherein each channel of the plurality of channels have a substantially similar volume.

8. The sound isolation device of claim 1 , wherein each channel of the plurality of channels have a substantially similar shape across a width of the at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer.

9. The sound isolation device of claim 1 , wherein the at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer includes a plurality of degenerate acoustic scatterers, wherein the plurality of degenerate acoustic scatterers are spaced apart at a substantially equal distance from each other, and wherein the acoustic dipole response and the acoustic monopole response of the plurality of degenerate acoustic scatterers have substantially similar resonant frequencies.

10. The sound isolation device of claim 1 , wherein the at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer is mounted within a vehicle.

11. The sound isolation device of claim 10 , wherein the at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer forms a structural member of the vehicle.

12. A sound isolation system comprising:

at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer;

the at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer having a plurality of channels, the plurality of channels each have an open end and a terminal end, the terminal ends of the plurality of channels being separate from each other;

wherein the at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer has an acoustic monopole response and an acoustic dipole response, wherein the acoustic dipole response and the acoustic monopole response of the at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer have a resonant frequency that is substantially similar;

and

a first wall and a second wall, wherein the first wall and second wall generally oppose one another and define a space, wherein the at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer is located in the space between the first wall and the second wall.

13. The sound isolation system of claim 12 , wherein the plurality of channels includes at least three channels.

14. The sound isolation system of claim 12 , wherein the plurality of channels includes at least four channels.

15. The sound isolation system of claim 14 , wherein a cross section along a width of the at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer defines a symmetrical shape having at least one line of symmetry, the symmetrical shape having an outer perimeter, wherein the open end of the plurality of channels are adjacent to the outer perimeter.

16. The sound isolation system of claim 12 , wherein each channel of the plurality of channels have a substantially similar volume.

17. The sound isolation system of claim 12 , wherein each channel of the plurality of channels have a substantially similar shape across a width of the at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer.

18. The sound isolation system of claim 12 , wherein a distance of the space between the first wall and the second wall is smaller than a wavelength at the resonant frequency:

D

<

c

f

,

and

wherein D the distance of the space between the first wall and the second wall, c is a speed of sound, and f is the resonant frequency of the acoustic monopole response and the acoustic dipole response of the at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer.

19. The sound isolation system of claim 12 , further comprising:

a plurality degenerate acoustic scatterers forming an array of degenerate acoustic scatters, the array of degenerate acoustic scatters located between the first wall and the second wall, wherein the array of degenerate acoustic scatters includes a number (N) of acoustic scatterers,

wherein a number (N) of the plurality degenerate acoustic scatterers is:

N=D /( c/f ), and

wherein D is a distance between the first wall and the second wall, c is the speed of sound in air, and f is the resonant frequency of the acoustic monopole response and the acoustic dipole response.

20. The sound isolation system of claim 19 , wherein the array of degenerate acoustic scatters are arranged along a row substantially perpendicular to one of the first wall and the second wall.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 19, 2023
From: TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA, INC.
To: TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Reel/Frame 063373/0237 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 13, 2019
From: SU, XIAOSHI; BANERJEE, DEBASISH
To: TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Reel/Frame 050994/0623 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 13, 2019
From: SHINTAKU, YUJI; NAKAJIMA, KATSUHIKO
To: TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Reel/Frame 050994/0702 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20210142773A1 · May 13, 2021
Cited By (4)
US 1,122,530 US 12,396,893 US 12,586,556 US 12,589,411