IP Library › Granted Patent US 11,584,542
Granted Patent B1
US 11,584,542 · App. 17/562,113 · Granted Feb 21, 2023

Systems and methods for optimization of lag for a pilot intervention

Inventors: Nicholas Moy (South Burlington, VT); Collin Freiheit (Burlington, VT); Joshua E. Auerbach (Waterbury Center, VT)
Assignee: BETA AIR, LLC
B64D45/00G05D1/0669G08G5/003G08G5/02B64D2045/0085
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,584,542
App. No.
17/562,113
Granted
Feb 21, 2023
Kind
B1
Abstract

Systems and methods for lag optimization of pilot intervention is provided. A critical event may be identified while an electric aircraft is in an autopilot mode and operating primarily under autonomous functions; as a result, a flight controller of the system may switch from an autopilot mode to a manual mode, allowing pilot intervention. System made determine a lag duration as a function of the critical event and a phase of operation of the electric aircraft to determine a lag duration before pilot intervention occurs.

Claims (29)

1. A system for optimization of lag for a pilot intervention in an electric aircraft, the system comprising:

a sensor suite configured to detect a critical event of an electric aircraft;

a flight controller communicatively connected to the sensor suite, wherein the flight controller is configured to:

receive a critical event datum from the sensor suite;

identify a current phase of operation of the electric aircraft as a function of the critical event datum;

identify an urgency level of the current phase of operation and the critical event;

determine a lag duration as a function of the identified urgency level of the current phase of operation and the critical event, wherein the lag duration decreases as the urgency level increases; and

perform a control operation of setting an optimized lag duration based on the determined lag duration.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the current phase of operation comprises a landing of the electric aircraft.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the phase of operation comprises a takeoff of the electric aircraft.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the critical event comprises an engine failure of the electric aircraft.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the critical event comprises a hazardous weather condition.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the lag duration comprises an amount of time necessary for reversion from an autopilot mode to a manual mode.

7. The system of claim 1 , further comprising a computing device, wherein the computing device is further configured to displaying the lag duration.

8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the electric aircraft is a vertical takeoff and landing aircraft (eVTOL).

9. A method for optimization of lag for a pilot intervention in an electric aircraft, the method comprising:

detecting, by a sensor suite, a critical event of an electric aircraft;

receiving, by a flight controller communicatively connected to the sensor suite, a critical event datum from the sensor suite;

identifying, by the flight controller, a current phase of operation of an electric aircraft as a function of the critical event datum;

identifying, by the flight controller, an urgency level of the current phase of operation and the critical event;

determining, by the flight controller, a lag duration as a function of the identified urgency level of the current phase of operation and the critical event wherein the lag duration decreases as the urgency level increases; and

performing, by the flight controller, a control operation of setting an optimized lag duration based on the determined lag duration.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the current phase of operation comprises a landing of the electric aircraft.

11. The method of claim 9 , wherein the current phase of operation comprises a takeoff of the electric aircraft.

12. The method of claim 9 , wherein the critical event comprises an engine failure of the electric aircraft.

13. The method of claim 9 , wherein the critical event comprises a hazardous weather condition.

14. The method of claim 9 , wherein the lag duration comprises an amount of time necessary for reversion from an autopilot mode to a manual mode.

15. The method of claim 9 , further comprising displaying, by a computer device, the lag duration.

16. The method of claim 9 , wherein the electric aircraft is a vertical takeoff and landing aircraft (eVTOL).

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 20, 2022
From: MOY, NICHOLAS; FREIHEIT, COLLIN; AUERBACH, JOSHUA E.
To: BETA AIR, LLC
Reel/Frame 059648/0052 →
Cited By (1)
US 12,315,375