IP Library Granted Patent US 11,745,896
Granted Patent B2
US 11,745,896 · App. 17/930,124 · Granted Sep 5, 2023

Systems and methods for airport selection and display of range remaining during engine out conditions

Inventors: Michael Mast (Sun City, AZ); Yuta Morioka (Tempe, AZ); Martin Jezek (Brno, CZ); Jeffrey Glenn (Phoenix, AZ)
Assignee: HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.
B64D45/00B64D43/02B64D45/08G05D1/105G08G5/0047G08G5/025B64D2045/0085
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,745,896
App. No.
17/930,124
Granted
Sep 5, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

Flight guidance systems and methods that provide an airport selection in response to an EO condition in a single engine plane. The airport selection takes into consideration factors such as optimal approach type, runway length, weather, terrain, remaining battery time, and the like. Additionally, various also generate and display a visual indication of a remaining glide range when the EO condition is happening; the remaining glide range determination is based, at least in part, on terrain.

Claims (39)

1. A flight guidance system for airport selection during engine out (EO) conditions in an aircraft, the system comprising:

an avionic display;

a controller architecture in operable communication with the avionic display, the controller architecture configured to determine when an EO condition is occurring and further configured, upon determining that the EO condition is occurring, to at least selectively perform EO guidance operations, the EO guidance operations including:

computing an optimal EO destination airport and corresponding path to the optimal EO destination airport from a current location of the aircraft;

commanding the avionic display to present the optimal EO destination airport and the corresponding path for a pilot to review;

receiving a pilot selection of the optimal EO destination airport subsequent to presenting the optimal EO destination airport;

constructing a lateral and a vertical glide path to the optimal EO destination airport;

creating a plurality of glide profiles for each of a plurality of radials extending from the current location, each glide profile having a range that indicates an aircraft specific performance in wind and loss of potential energy due to lateral maneuvers;

receive an activate EO guidance command; and

in response to receiving the active EO guidance command, guide the aircraft to the optimal EO destination airport.

2. The flight guidance system of claim 1 , wherein the controller architecture is further configured to:

determine when an enable is valid for EO guidance; and

when the enable is valid, begin the EO guidance mode in response to receiving the activate EO guidance command.

3. The flight guidance system of claim 2 , wherein the controller architecture is further configured to determine that the enable is valid for EO guidance as a function of when an altitude of the aircraft is at or above a minimum height above ground.

4. The flight guidance system of claim 1 , wherein the controller architecture is further configured, upon determining that the EO condition is occurring, to generate a notification of the EO condition.

5. The flight guidance system of claim 1 , wherein the controller architecture is further configured to continuously determine the current location and a current trajectory of the aircraft by processing aircraft status data.

6. The flight guidance system of claim 4 , further comprising:

a source of the engine status in operable communication with the controller architecture; and

a source of the aircraft status data in operable communication with the controller architecture.

7. The flight guidance system of claim 1 , wherein the controller architecture is further configured to determine proper points along the corresponding path to command the avionic display to indicate with a graphical object or icon placed in its relative position on the corresponding path, a timing for each of: setting landing flaps; deploying landing gears; and, turning on landing lights.

8. The flight guidance system of claim 1 , wherein the controller architecture is further configured to determine the optimal EO destination airport is one of a number of optimal EO airports that are within a distance threshold from the aircraft.

9. The flight guidance system of claim 8 , wherein the controller architecture is further configured to set the distance threshold equal to a glide ring.

10. The flight guidance system of claim 9 , wherein the controller architecture is further configured to receive an assigned priority for each of the optimal EO airports in the number of optimal airports.

11. A method of flight guidance for airport selection during engine out (EO) conditions in an aircraft, the method comprising:

processing, in a controller architecture programmed by programming instructions, received engine status to determine whether an EO condition is indicated; and

responsive to determining that an EO condition is indicated, to at least selectively perform EO guidance operations in the controller architecture, the EO guidance operations including:

computing an optimal EO destination airport and corresponding path to the optimal EO destination airport from a current location of the aircraft;

commanding an avionic display to present the optimal EO destination airport and the corresponding path for a pilot to review;

receiving a pilot selection of the optimal EO destination airport subsequent to presenting the optimal EO destination airport;

constructing a lateral and a vertical glide path to the optimal EO destination airport; and

creating a plurality of glide profiles for each of a plurality of radials extending from the current location, each glide profile having a range that indicates an aircraft specific performance in wind and loss of potential energy due to lateral maneuvers;

receiving an activate EO guidance command; and

in response to receiving the active EO guidance command, guiding the aircraft to the optimal EO destination airport.

12. The method of flight guidance of claim 11 , further comprising:

tuning a multi-mode digital radio (MMDR) to an appropriate frequency if the pilot selection includes an Instrument Landing System (ILS) approach.

13. The method of flight guidance of claim 11 , further comprising determining points along the corresponding path to command the avionic display to indicate with a graphical object or icon placed in its relative position on the corresponding path, a timing for each of: setting landing flaps; deploying landing gears; and, turning on landing lights.

14. The method of flight guidance of claim 11 , further comprising determining the optimal EO destination airport is one of a number of optimal EO airports that are within a distance threshold from the aircraft.

15. The method of flight guidance of claim 14 , further comprising setting the distance threshold equal to a glide ring.

16. The method of flight guidance of claim 15 , further comprising receiving an assigned priority for each of the optimal EO airports in the number of optimal airports.

Continuity (3)
Continuation 17179957 · Feb 19, 2021
Provisional Application 62986336 · Mar 6, 2020
Related Publication 20230002071A1 · Jan 5, 2023
Cited By (1)
US 12,654,873