IP Library Granted Patent US 11,762,916
Granted Patent B1
US 11,762,916 · App. 17/404,702 · Granted Sep 19, 2023

User interface for identifying unmet technical needs and/or technical problems

Inventors: Mark Daniel McClusky (Rocky River, OH); Matthew Donald McClusky (Westlake, OH); Emily Elizabeth McClusky (Westlake, OH); Jonathan Nathaniel Fegely (Lakewood, OH); Jonathan Hilton Evans (Seattle, WA)
Assignee: Artemis Intelligence LLC
G06F16/9038G06F16/24578G06F16/90328G06F16/93
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,762,916
App. No.
17/404,702
Granted
Sep 19, 2023
Kind
B1
Abstract

Systems and methods described herein comprise a user interface for searching, analyzing, and interpreting documents obtained from computer databases. Exemplary systems and methods receive a user input and automatically identify, analyze, and interpret unmet technical needs and/or technical problems in specific areas of technology based on that input. Other exemplary systems and methods automatically identify, analyze, and interpret unmet technical needs and/or technical problems across numerous areas of technology based on similar user input. Other exemplary systems and methods receive user input and automatically identify, analyze, and interpret documents associated with a company to determine one or more technical capabilities of that company.

Claims (37)

1. A computer implemented method for analyzing documents, the method comprising:

receiving an input from a user via a user interface;

associating the input with a technological field;

generating one or more suggested terms associated with the technological field, wherein the one or more suggested terms are based on technological concepts related to the technological field;

displaying the one or more suggested terms at the user interface;

receiving a selection of the one or more suggested terms;

analyzing documents in a document database to identify documents having one or more technology elements based on the input, the technological field associated with the input, and the selection of the one or more suggested terms; and

generating a capability score based at least on the identified documents and a user profile.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the input is one of a text string, a portion of a document, or a complete document.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the documents in the document database are associated with the user.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the capability score is based at least on the number of technology elements identified in the documents that correspond to technology elements associated with the user profile.

5. The method of claim 3 , wherein the capability score is further based on a uniqueness factor between identified documents associated with the user and identified documents not associated with the user.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: analyzing the documents in the document database to identity one or more problem kernels comprising the technology elements identified based on the input, the technological field associated with the input, and the selection of the one or more suggested terms.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

displaying the identified documents at the user interface, wherein the identified documents are organized according to relevance of their technology elements.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: generating the suggested terms according to a priority weight.

9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: generating the suggested terms in view of excluded terms.

10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: generating a visualization related to the technical capability score of the user based on the identified documents.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the visualization illustrates problem intensity.

12. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: associating a technological field with the user based on a user profile.

13. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

receiving a selection of a document of the identified documents; and,

displaying the document at the user interface, including identified technological concepts associated with the document.

14. The method of claim 13 , further comprising:

displaying one or more visualizations related to the selected document.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more suggested terms are mapped to a plurality of expressions based at least on common alternative expressions of the one or more suggested terms.

16. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: upon receiving the selection of the one or more suggested terms, generating a secondary suggested term associated with the technological field.

17. The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the technical capability score of the user is based on a uniqueness factor.

18. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: generating a capability fit based on the one or more technology elements.

19. A computer implemented method for determining one or more technical opportunities, the method comprising:

receiving an input from a user via a user interface;

associating the input with a technological field;

generating one or more suggested terms associated with the technological field, wherein the one or more suggested terms are based on technological concepts related to the technological field;

displaying the one or more suggested terms at the user interface;

receiving a selection of the one or more suggested terms;

identifying documents in a document database with one or more problem kernels comprising a plurality of technology elements, wherein the technology elements are associated with a competitor of the user;

generating an opportunity score of the user based on the identified documents and associated technology elements.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 1, 2023
From: MCCLUSKY, MARK DANIEL; MCCLUSKY, MATTHEW DONALD; MCCLUSKY, EMILY ELIZABETH; FEGELY, JONATHAN NATHANIEL; EVANS, JONATHAN HILTON
To: ARTEMIS INTELLIGENCE LLC
Reel/Frame 062562/0875 →
Continuity (1)
Provisional Application 63066553 · Aug 17, 2020
Cited By (1)
US 12,572,403