IP Library › Granted Patent US 11,803,478
Granted Patent B1
US 11,803,478 · App. 17/969,621 · Granted Oct 31, 2023

Controlled activation of interdependent bindings

Inventor: Carl Reuben Gould (Folsom, CA)
Assignee: INDUCTIVE AUTOMATION, LLC
G06F12/0862G05B19/058G06F8/38G06F16/9024G06F16/9027G05B19/05G05B2219/13144G05B2219/14083G06Q10/0639H04N19/12
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,803,478
App. No.
17/969,621
Granted
Oct 31, 2023
Kind
B1
Abstract

A system for efficiently configuring bindings based on a dependency graph is described. The system may generate or access a graph comprising a set of nodes. Each node may represent a binding and is associated with a component property of a component hierarchy corresponding to a hierarchical structure of a data model. Each node of the graph may be connected to at least one other node with an edge representing a dependency in the hierarchical structure of the data model. The system may receive a request to generate a view associated with the set of bindings. The system may determine an order to load the set of bindings based on the graph, and may load the set of bindings based on the determined order.

Claims (44)

1. A computer-implemented method comprising:

accessing a graph comprising a set of nodes, each node representing a binding of a set of bindings and associated with a component property of a real-world physical component of a component hierarchy corresponding to a hierarchical structure of a data model, wherein each node is connected to at least one other node of the set of nodes with an edge representing a dependency in the hierarchical structure of the data model;

receiving a request to generate a graphic user interface populated with a view associated with the set of bindings;

determining an order to load the set of bindings based on the accessed graph and based on the hierarchical structure of the data model, the determined order selected in part to account for a startup lag caused by loading bindings and the dependencies in the hierarchical structure such that each dependent binding is loaded only after each binding on which the dependent binding depends has produced valid data; and

populating the graphic user interface with the view by loading the set of bindings into the view based on the determined order.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the graph is generated by traversing the hierarchical structure of the data model to identify the set of bindings.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein nodes of the graph are generated based on each identified binding while traversing the hierarchical structure.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein each edge of the graph is directional indicating a direction of dependency between the nodes coupled to the edge, and wherein determining the order to load the set of bindings comprises:

identifying within the graph a first set of nodes with no outgoing edges;

identifying a second set of nodes that are directly connected to the first set of nodes; and

loading the first set of nodes before loading the second set of nodes.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , further comprising:

removing a cycle from the graph, wherein the cycle is not associated with an originating node.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein a binding is a tag binding, a property binding, an expression binding, an expression structure binding, a query binding, a tag history binding, or an HTTP (Hypertext Transfer Protocol) binding.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein a data source associated with the data model is one of: a programmable logic controller, an Application Programming Interface, a function, an expression, a database, and a subtree of a second property tree.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein loading the set of bindings is further based on loading time associated with each of the set of bindings such that a dependent binding is loaded an amount of time equal to the loading time after a binding upon which the dependent binding depends is loaded.

9. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium comprising memory with executable computer instructions encoded thereon that, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations, the instructions comprising instructions to:

access a graph comprising a set of nodes, each node representing a binding of a set of bindings and associated with a component property of a real-world physical component of a component hierarchy corresponding to a hierarchical structure of a data model, wherein each node is connected to at least one other node of the set of nodes with an edge representing a dependency in the hierarchical structure of the data model;

receive a request to generate a graphic user interface populated with a view associated with the set of bindings;

determine an order to load the set of bindings based on the accessed graph and based on the hierarchical structure of the data model, the determined order selected in part to account for a startup lag caused by loading bindings and the dependencies in the hierarchical structure such that each dependent binding is loaded only after each binding on which the dependent binding depends has produced valid data; and

populate the graphic user interface with the view by loading the set of bindings into the view based on the determined order.

10. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 9 , wherein the graph is generated by traversing the hierarchical structure of the data model to identify the set of bindings.

11. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 9 , wherein nodes of the graph are generated based on each identified binding while traversing the hierarchical structure.

12. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 9 , wherein each edge of the graph is directional indicating a direction of dependency between the nodes coupled to the edge, and wherein determining the order to load the set of bindings comprises:

identifying within the graph a first set of nodes with no outgoing edges;

identifying a second set of nodes that are directly connected to the first set of nodes; and

loading the first set of nodes before loading the second set of nodes.

13. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 9 , wherein a data source associated with the data model is one of: a programmable logic controller, an Application Programming Interface, a function, an expression, a database, and a subtree of a second property tree.

14. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 9 , wherein loading the set of bindings is further based on loading time associated with each of the set of bindings such that a dependent binding is loaded an amount of time equal to the loading time after a binding upon which the dependent binding depends is loaded.

15. A computing system comprising:

a processor; and

a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing instructions for detecting and blocking a pop-up loop, the instructions when executed by the processor cause the processor to perform steps including:

accessing a graph comprising a set of nodes, each node representing a binding of a set of bindings and associated with a component property of a real-world physical component of a component hierarchy corresponding to a hierarchical structure of a data model, wherein each node is connected to at least one other node of the set of nodes with an edge representing a dependency in the hierarchical structure of the data model;

receiving a request to generate a graphic user interface populated with a view associated with the set of bindings;

determining an order to load the set of bindings based on the accessed graph and based on the hierarchical structure of the data model, the determined order selected in part to account for a startup lag caused by loading bindings and the dependencies in the hierarchical structure such that each dependent binding is loaded only after each binding on which the dependent binding depends has produced valid data; and

populating the graphic user interface with the view by loading the set of bindings into the view based on the determined order.

16. The computing system of claim 15 , wherein the graph is generated by traversing the hierarchical structure of the data model to identify the set of bindings.

17. The computing system of claim 15 , wherein nodes of the graph are generated based on each identified binding while traversing the hierarchical structure.

18. The computing system of claim 15 , wherein each edge of the graph is directional indicating a direction of dependency between the nodes coupled to the edge, and wherein determining the order to load the set of bindings comprises:

identifying within the graph a first set of nodes with no outgoing edges;

identifying a second set of nodes that are directly connected to the first set of nodes; and

loading the first set of nodes before loading the second set of nodes.

19. The computing system of claim 15 , wherein a binding is a tag binding, a property binding, an expression binding, an expression structure binding, a query binding, a tag history binding, or an HTTP (Hypertext Transfer Protocol) binding.

20. The computing system of claim 15 , wherein a data source associated with the data model is one of: a programmable logic controller, an Application Programming Interface, a function, an expression, a database, and a subtree of a second property tree.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 21, 2022
From: GOULD, CARL REUBEN
To: INDUCTIVE AUTOMATION, LLC
Reel/Frame 061495/0440 →
Cited By (2)
US 12,493,557 US 12,705,102