Denture having polished cameo surface and unpolished intaglio surface
Base material arrangements having at least two layers can accommodate the addition of antifungal material (nanofiller), such as in denture base resin without significantly compromising the mechanical properties and/or translucency of the base material arrangements. Antifungal agents such as nanosilver and nanozirconia can be used to modify a surface layer of the material arrangements, such as the denture base, to overcome certain known shortcomings of the modified materials, e.g., typical acrylic resins containing nanosilver and nanozirconia.
1. A denture having a polished cameo surface and an unpolished intaglio surface made of a dental restoration base material,
wherein the dental restoration base material comprises:
a first layer comprising at least 90 wt. %, relative to total first layer weight, of a cured first composition comprising, prior to curing, a first (meth)acrylic polymer and a first (meth)acrylic monomer as the cameo surface of the denture; and
a surface layer comprising at least 90 wt. %, relative to total surface layer weight, of a cured second composition comprising, prior to curing, a second (meth)acrylic polymer, a second (meth)acrylic monomer as the intaglio surface of the denture, and 0.45 to 0.55 wt. % of antimicrobial nanoparticles, relative to a total surface layer weight,
wherein no gradient in antimicrobial nanoparticle content and no continuous bulk containing the antimicrobial nanoparticles is present between the first and surface layers,
wherein the first layer is free of the antimicrobial nanoparticles,
wherein the antimicrobial nanoparticles are selected from silver nanoparticles and zirconium dioxide nanoparticles, and
wherein the material has a flexural strength in a range of 78 to 87 MPa, a translucency parameter in a range of 6.5 to 13, and a surface roughness in a range of 0.13 to 0.2 μm.
2. The denture of claim 1 , wherein the silver nanoparticles have an average particle size of 5 to 40 nm.
3. The denture of claim 1 , wherein the zirconium dioxide nanoparticles have an average particle size of 20 to 60 nm.
4. The denture of claim 1 , wherein the surface layer directly contacts the first layer on at least portions of the first layer.
5. The denture of claim 1 , wherein the surface layer has a thickness of 100 to 3,000 μm.
6. The denture of claim 1 , wherein the first (meth)acrylic polymer and the second (meth)acrylic polymer each comprise at least 90 wt. % poly(methyl methacrylate).
7. The denture of claim 1 , wherein the first (meth)acrylic monomer and the second (meth)acrylic monomer each comprise at least 90 wt. % methyl methacrylate.
8. The denture of claim 1 , wherein the first (meth)acrylic polymer and the second (meth)acrylic polymer are the same,
wherein the first (meth)acrylic monomer and the second (meth)acrylic monomer are the same, and
wherein the first and the second (meth)acrylic monomer are suitable to form the same polymer as the first and the second (meth)acrylic polymer.
9. The denture of claim 1 , which is suitable to reduce Candida adhesion to by at least 10%, relative to materials comprising the first layer alone.
10. A method of making the denture of claim 1 , the method comprising:
prepolymerizing the first composition comprising the first (meth)acrylic monomer and the first (meth)acrylic polymer, to obtain a first viscous composition;
conforming the first viscous composition into a dental mold;
prepolymerizing the second composition comprising the second (meth)acrylic monomer, 0.45 to 0.55 wt. %, relative to a total second composition weight, of the antimicrobial nanoparticles, and the second (meth)acrylic polymer, to obtain a second viscous composition;
conforming the second viscous composition into the dental mold over the first viscous composition;
polymerizing the first and second viscous compositions in the dental mold, thereby forming the denture.
11. The denture of claim 1 , wherein the dental restoration base material has a flexural strength in a range of 78 to 82 MPa, a translucency parameter in a range of 6.5 to 7.5, and a surface roughness in a range of 0.18 to 0.2 μm.
12. The denture of claim 1 , wherein the dental restoration base material has a flexural strength in a range of 85 to 87 MPa, a translucency parameter in a range of 12 to 13, and a surface roughness in a range of 0.13 to 0.15 μm.