Aircraft spatial configuration difference display system

1. A method for visualizing aircraft configurations, the method comprising:

determining, by a computer system, a set of weight differences between weights for spatial zones in an aircraft and corresponding spatial zones in a comparison aircraft;

displaying, by the computer system, a visual representation of the aircraft in a graphical user interface on a display system; and

displaying, by the computer system, the spatial zones in the visual representation of the aircraft in association with a set of graphical indicators identifying the set of weight differences between the spatial zones and the corresponding spatial zones in the graphical user interface on the display system.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

determining, by the computer system, the weights for the spatial zones in the aircraft and the corresponding spatial zones in the comparison aircraft.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein determining, by the computer system, the weights for the spatial zones and the corresponding spatial zones comprises:

determining, by the computer system, the weights for the spatial zones and the corresponding spatial zones using parts data.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the parts data comprises at least one of a bill of materials identifying parts used in the aircraft and the comparison aircraft, spatial part information identifying part locations for the parts, weight data for the parts, a parts list, a part location table, or a weight list for the parts.

5. The method of claim 1 , determining, by the computer system, the set of weight differences between the weights for the spatial zones in the aircraft and the corresponding spatial zones in the comparison aircraft comprises:

identifying, by the computer system, parts located in a selected spatial zone in the spatial zones;

determining, by the computer system, first weights for the parts in the selected spatial zone;

summing, by the computer system, the first weights to obtain a first summed weight for the selected spatial zone;

identifying, by the computer system, the parts in a selected corresponding spatial zone that corresponds to the selected spatial zone;

determining, by the computer system, the weights for the parts in the selected corresponding spatial zone;

summing, by the computer system, second weights for the parts in the selected corresponding spatial zone to obtain a second summed weight for the selected corresponding spatial zone; and

determining, by the computer system, a difference between the first summed weight and the second summed weight, wherein the difference is for the selected spatial zone and the selected corresponding spatial zone.

6. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

receiving, by the computer system, a spatial zone selection of a spatial zone in the spatial zones having a weight difference from a corresponding spatial zone in the corresponding spatial zones;

identifying, by the computer system, a group of parts in the spatial zone and in the corresponding spatial zone having the weight difference in response to the spatial zone selection of the spatial zone; and

displaying, by the computer system, the group of parts in the spatial zone in the graphical user interface.

7. The method of claim 6 further comprising:

receiving, by the computer system, a part selection of a part in the group of parts;

determining, by the computer system, a hierarchical structure of components containing the part; and

displaying, by the computer system, the hierarchical structure of the components with a graphical indicator identifying the part in the components in the hierarchical structure having the weight difference.

8. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

receiving, by the computer system, a spatial zone selection of a spatial zone in the spatial zones having a weight difference from a corresponding spatial zone in the corresponding spatial zones;

identifying, by the computer system, a group of parts in the spatial zone that is absent from the corresponding spatial zone; and

displaying, by the computer system, the group of parts in the spatial zone with a graphical indicator indicating that the group of parts is absent from the corresponding spatial zone.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the visual representation of the aircraft is a first visual representation and further comprising:

displaying, by the computer system, a second visual representation of the comparison aircraft in the graphical user interface on the display system; and

displaying, by the computer system, the group of parts in a number of the corresponding spatial zones in the second visual representation of the comparison aircraft in the graphical user interface on the display system.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the weights are selected from one of actual part weights and estimated part weights.

11. The method of claim 5 , wherein the parts are one of a module, an assembly, and components.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the aircraft and the comparison aircraft are both of a same model or of a same model variant.

13. A configuration visualization system comprising:

a computer system comprising processor units and a display system, wherein the computer system executes program instructions to:

determine a set of weight differences between weights for spatial zones in an aircraft and corresponding spatial zones in a comparison aircraft;

display a visual representation of the aircraft in a graphical user interface on a display system; and

display the spatial zones in the visual representation of the aircraft in association with a set of graphical indicators identifying the set of weight differences between the spatial zones and the corresponding spatial zones in the graphical user interface on the display system.

14. The configuration visualization system of claim 13 , wherein the computer system executes the program instructions to:

determine the weights for the spatial zones in the aircraft and the corresponding spatial zones in the comparison aircraft.

15. The configuration visualization system of claim 14 , wherein in

determining the weights for the spatial zones and the corresponding spatial zones, the computer system executes the program instructions to:

determining the weights for the spatial zones and the corresponding spatial zones using parts data.

16. The configuration visualization system of claim 15 , wherein the parts data comprises at least one of a bill of materials identifying parts used in the aircraft and the comparison aircraft, spatial part information identifying part locations for the parts, weight data for the parts, a parts list, a part location table, or a weight list for the parts.

17. The configuration visualization system of claim 14 , wherein in determining the set of weight differences between the weights for the spatial zones in the aircraft and the corresponding spatial zones in the comparison aircraft, the computer system executes the program instructions to:

identify parts located in a selected spatial zone in the spatial zones;

determine first weights for the parts in the selected spatial zone;

sum the first weights to obtain a first summed weight for the selected spatial zone;

identify the parts in a selected corresponding spatial zone that corresponds to the selected spatial zone;

determine the weights for the parts in the selected corresponding spatial zone;

sum second weights for the parts in the selected corresponding spatial zone to obtain a second summed weight for the selected corresponding spatial zone; and

determine a difference between the first summed weight and the second summed weight, wherein the difference is for the selected spatial zone and the selected corresponding spatial zone.

18. The configuration visualization system of claim 13 , wherein the computer system executes the program instructions to:

receive a spatial zone selection of a spatial zone in the spatial zones having a weight difference from a corresponding spatial zone in the corresponding spatial zones;

identify a group of parts in the spatial zone and in the corresponding spatial zone having the weight difference in response to the spatial zone selection of the spatial zone; and

display the group of parts in the spatial zone in the graphical user interface.

19. The configuration visualization system of claim 18 , wherein the computer system executes the program instructions to:

receive a part selection of a part in the group of parts;

determine a hierarchical structure of components containing the part; and

display the hierarchical structure of the components with a graphical indicator identifying the part in components in the hierarchical structure having the weight difference.

20. The configuration visualization system of claim 13 , wherein the computer system executes the program instructions to:

receive a spatial zone selection of a spatial zone in the spatial zones having a weight difference from a corresponding spatial zone in the corresponding spatial zones;

identify a group of parts in the spatial zone that is absent from the corresponding spatial zone; and

display the group of parts in the spatial zone with a graphical indicator indicating that the group of parts is absent from the corresponding spatial zone.

21. The configuration visualization system of claim 20 , wherein the visual representation of the aircraft is a first visual representation and wherein the computer system executes the program instructions to:

display a second visual representation of the comparison aircraft in the graphical user interface on the display system; and

display the group of parts in a number of the corresponding spatial zones in the second visual representation of the comparison aircraft in the graphical user interface on the display system.

22. The configuration visualization system of claim 13 , wherein the weights are selected from one of actual part weights and estimated part weights.

23. The configuration visualization system of claim 17 , wherein the parts are one of a module, an assembly, and components.

24. The configuration visualization system of claim 13 , wherein the aircraft and the comparison aircraft are both of a same model or of a same model variant.

25. A computer program product for visualizing aircraft configurations, the computer program product comprising a computer readable storage medium having program instructions embodied therewith, the program instructions executable by a computer system to cause the computer system to perform a method of:

determining, by the computer system, a set of weight differences between weights for spatial zones in an aircraft and corresponding spatial zones in a comparison aircraft;

displaying, by the computer system, a visual representation of the aircraft in a graphical user interface on a display system; and

displaying, by the computer system, the spatial zones in the visual representation of the aircraft in association with a set of graphical indicators identifying the set of weight differences between the spatial zones and the corresponding spatial zones in the graphical user interface on the display system.

26. A method for visualizing platform configurations, the method comprising:

determining, by a computer system, a set of weight differences between weights for spatial zones in a platform and corresponding spatial zones in a comparison platform;

displaying, by the computer system, a visual representation of the platform in a graphical user interface on a display system; and

displaying, by the computer system, the spatial zones in the visual representation of the platform in association with a set of graphical indicators identifying the set of weight differences between the spatial zones and the corresponding spatial zones in the graphical user interface on the display system.