IP Library Granted Patent US 12,082,145
Granted Patent B1
US 12,082,145 · App. 17/967,407 · Granted Sep 3, 2024

Systems and methods for implementing permissionless network consensus for using blockchain

Inventors: Amir Haleem (San Francisco, CA); Andrew Thompson (San Francisco, CA); Andrew Allen (San Francisco, CA); Marc Nijdam (San Francisco, CA); Jay Kickliter (San Francisco, CA)
Assignee: DECENTRALIZED WIRELESS FOUNDATION, INC.
H04W64/00H04B17/318G16Y10/75H04L63/0442
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,082,145
App. No.
17/967,407
Granted
Sep 3, 2024
Kind
B1
Abstract

Provided herein are systems and methods for implementing a network consensus for a blockchain network that is characterized by one or more, or all, of the following attributes: (1) implementation of a Proof-of-Coverage scheme; (2) lack of permission for nodes to participate in the network; (3) decentralization, with lack of incentives to centralize; (4) byzantine fault tolerance; (5) based on useful work to the network; (6) high confirmed transaction rate; and (7) censor-resistant transactions.

Claims (21)

1. A method for achieving consensus in a blockchain network, which blockchain network is configured to provide a network coverage, the method comprising:

(a) validating a plurality of transactions related to providing the network coverage;

(b) achieving a consensus on validating at least one of the plurality of transactions at least by decrypting the at least one of the plurality of transactions within a given time window; and

(c) storing the at least one of the plurality of transactions in a new block in the blockchain network and recording a proof of the at least one of the plurality of transactions in the blockchain network.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of transactions is encrypted using a shared public key.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one of the plurality of transactions is decrypted by a set of nodes from a group of nodes.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the consensus is achieved when a number of the set of nodes exceeds a pre-determined threshold.

5. The method of claim 3 , wherein the set of nodes is selected from the group of nodes based on a score as a function of previously created proofs of providing the network coverage.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the score is computed based on a number of successful verifications, a number of failed verifications, and a time since the last successful verification.

7. The method of claim 5 , wherein the set of nodes are re-selected as the score is updated.

8. The method of claim 3 , wherein the group of nodes are elected based on score as a function of previously created proof of providing the network coverage.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the group of nodes are elected for the given time window.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein the proof of providing network coverage comprises verification that one or more nodes provides expected wireless network coverage.

11. The method of claim 3 , wherein each of the set of nodes decrypts a share of the at least one of the plurality of transactions.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the consensus further comprises an ordering of the at least one transaction in the plurality of transactions.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the consensus achieved is tolerant to Byzantine failures.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the proof is submitted by a miner node in the blockchain network.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the proof is created by validating a geographical location of a node providing the at least one of the plurality of transactions.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the geographical location is based at least in part on a strength of a radio frequency signal.

17. The method of claim 14 , wherein the proof is created by validating a correct time.

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein the correct time is validated using a time synchronization process.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 30, 2022
From: HELIUM SYSTEMS, INC.
To: DECENTRALIZED WIRELESS FOUNDATION, INC.
Reel/Frame 061919/0102 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 23, 2022
From: HALEEM, AMIR; THOMPSON, ANDREW; ALLEN, ANDREW; NIJDAM, MARC; KICKLITER, JAY
To: HELIUM SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 061864/0954 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 17152135 · Jan 19, 2021
Continuation 16837295 · Apr 1, 2020
Provisional Application 62830727 · Apr 8, 2019
Cited By (1)
US 12,689,897