IP Library Granted Patent US 12,198,529
Granted Patent B2
US 12,198,529 · App. 17/745,041 · Granted Jan 14, 2025

Systems and methods to manage a task based on a staff member's dynamic attributes

Inventor: Marc Neubauer (Silver Spring, MD)
G08B25/005G08B21/18
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,198,529
App. No.
17/745,041
Filed
May 16, 2022
Granted
Jan 14, 2025
Kind
B2
Examiner
FAN, HONGMIN
Art Unit
2687
USPC
340/573.4
Abstract

A method for managing an alarm issued by a medical device is disclosed. The method includes the steps of receiving the alarm from the medical device, ranking a staff member based in part on a dynamic attribute that is associated with the staff member, selecting a recipient based in part on the ranking, and providing an alert to the recipient.

Claims (63)

1. A method for managing a task, comprising the steps:

identifying the task;

ranking a staff member based in part on a staff member dynamic attribute that is associated with the staff member;

selecting a recipient based in part on the ranking;

assigning the task to the recipient; and

reassigning one or more tasks previously assigned to the recipient to another staff member.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the dynamic attribute is selected from a group of attributes consisting of:

capability;

availability;

workload;

burnout;

performance; and

management.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the capability attribute is based in part on one or more of the group consisting of:

education;

experience; and

training.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein:

the task comprises one or more of a patient task and a device task;

the availability attribute is based in part on one or more of the group consisting of:

break status; and

do not disturb (DND) status.

5. The method of claim 2 , wherein the workload attribute is based in part on one or more of the group consisting of:

a number of patients currently assigned to the staff member;

a number of currently assigned patients having a patient health assessment score above a threshold;

a number of active alarms above a sub-priority threshold and currently assigned to the staff member; and

a currently assigned patient who requires special care assigned to the staff member.

6. The method of claim 2 , wherein the burnout attribute is based in part on one or more of the group consisting of:

a reported level of burnout;

a measurement;

a grief event; and

a work schedule.

7. The method of claim 2 , wherein the performance attribute is based in part on one or more of the group consisting of:

a never event;

a preventable adverse event; and

an alarm response time >goal.

8. The method of claim 2 , wherein the management attribute is based in part on one or more of the group consisting of:

a number of backups to the staff member;

whether the staff member is assigned as a backup to another staff member; and

staffing level of current shift.

9. A system for managing a task, comprising:

a processor configured to accept an identification of the task; and

a memory communicatively coupled to the processor, the memory comprising:

a dynamic attribute of a staff member;

an algorithm for retrieving the dynamic attribute, ranking the staff member based in part on the dynamic attribute, selecting a recipient based in part on the ranking, assigning the task to the recipient; and reassigning one or more tasks previously assigned to the recipient to another staff member; and

instructions that, when loaded into the processor and executed, cause the processor to execute the algorithm upon identification of the task.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the task comprises resolution of an alarm received from a medical device; and

assigning the task comprises providing an alert to the recipient.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein:

ranking the staff member comprises a determination of whether the staff member has a capability to perform a corrective action to address the medical device alarm.

12. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining a criticality of the task based in part on a dynamic attribute of the recipient; and

assigning, when the determined criticality is greater than a threshold, a Do Not Disturb (DND) status to the recipient.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein ranking the staff member excludes a staff member who is currently assigned a Do Not Disturb (DND) status.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein ranking the staff member, if the task is associated with a patient under special care, comprises assessment of a special skill associated with the special care.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein ranking the staff member comprises using a patient dynamic attribute to select one of more dynamic attributes of the staff member to consider in the ranking.

16. A non-volatile memory comprising instructions that, when loaded into a processor and executed, cause the processor to perform steps of:

identifying a task;

ranking a staff member based in part on a dynamic attribute that is associated with the staff member;

selecting a recipient based in part on the ranking;

assigning the task to the recipient; and

reassigning one or more tasks previously assigned to the recipient to another staff member.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 19, 2025
From: NEUBAUER, MARC
To: MEDTECH INNOVATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 071457/0670 →
Continuity (6)
Continuation In Part 17506673 · Oct 21, 2021
Provisional Application 63268015 · Feb 15, 2022
Provisional Application 63246241 · Sep 20, 2021
Provisional Application 63236788 · Aug 25, 2021
Provisional Application 63214409 · Jun 24, 2021
Related Publication 20230005357A1 · Jan 5, 2023
References Cited (63)
US 6998978B2 · Kirkeby · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7432807B2 · Schmitt · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7551078B2 · Carlson · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7671733B2 · McNeal · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7749164B2 · Davis · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7920061B2 · Klein · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8392232B2 · McGillin · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8571884B2 · Badgett · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8655680B2 · Bechtel · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9052809B2 · Vesto · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9129501B1 · King · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9356888B2 · Gross · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9393366B2 · Gannon · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9649073B2 · Voalte · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9727829B2 · Bollapragada · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9734301B2 · King · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9830801B2 · Rusin · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10062274B2 · Wilson · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10064579B2 · Condurso · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10210953B2 · Greer · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10242060B2 · Butler · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10275570B2 · Norton · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10289107B2 · Warner · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10300194B2 · Day · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10347373B2 · Voalte · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10453157B2 · Kamen · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10463788B2 · Day · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10617815B2 · Day · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10642961B2 · Portnoy · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10765379B2 · Perschbacher · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10813580B2 · Dyell · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10898641B2 · Day · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10916119B2 · Baker · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10957445B2 · Faulks · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11437125B2 · Cossler · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20050242928A1 · Kirkeby · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20070001806A1 · Poll · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080235057A1 · Weidenhaupt · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20120215578A1 · Swierz, III · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120284053A1 · Rosenfeld · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130275539A1 · Gross · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130296823A1 · Melker · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20170372020A1 · Govro · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20190240405A1 · Wehba · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190307405A1 · Terry · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200066401A1 · Guelich · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200335209A1 · Holscher · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210027887A1 · Sampath · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210252210A1 · Day · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220108790A1 · Rice · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220129823A1 · Amato · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220230714A1 · Batman · 2022 [cited by applicant]
ECRI. Evaluation background: ancillary alarm notification systems. Health Devices Dec. 22, 2016. [cited by applicant]
ECRI. Evaluation: Extension Engage ancillary alarm notification system. Health Devices Dec. 22, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Speich, Reducing Alarm Fatigue in the Intensive Care Unit: A Quality Improvement Research Study, (2017). Doctoral Dissertation, Uni of Conn. [cited by applicant]
Au-Yeung, Reduction of false alarms in the intensive care unit using an optimized machine learning based approach, Digital Medicine (2019) 2:86. [cited by applicant]
Delft Design Labs, Silent ICU—Intensive Care Alarm System, Joint Master Project Feb.-Jun. 2017. [cited by applicant]
McFarlane, Faster clinical response to the onset of adverse events: A wearable metacognitive attention aid for hurse triage of clinical alarms. (2018) PLoS ONE 13(5). [cited by applicant]
Vocera, product description for Engage: workflow engine, downloaded Sep. 2021. [cited by applicant]
Vocera, Solution Brief, Engage, downloaded Sep. 2021. [cited by applicant]
Kooman, Reducing medical device alarms by an order of magnitude: A human factors approach, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 2021, vol. 49(1) 52-61. [cited by applicant]
Pater, Time series evaluation of improvement interventions to reduce alarm notifications in a paediatric hospital, BMJ Qual Safe 2020, vol. 29:717-726. [cited by applicant]
Vitoux, Perceptions of Infusion Pump Alarms, The Ar & Science of Nursing, vol. 41(5) Sep.-Oct. 2018. [cited by applicant]