IP Library Granted Patent US 12,198,550
Granted Patent B2
US 12,198,550 · App. 17/919,116 · Granted Jan 14, 2025

Video distribution apparatus, video distribution method and program

Inventors: Takuma Tsubaki (Musashino, JP); Ryota Ishibashi (Musashino, JP); Yuki Nakahara (Musashino, JP); Kotaro Ono (Musashino, JP); Takeshi Kuwahara (Musashino, JP)
Assignee: Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation
G08G1/16G06V20/58H04N21/2662
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,198,550
App. No.
17/919,116
Granted
Jan 14, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A video distribution device according to an embodiment is a video distribution device that distributes videos from a plurality of cameras installed in each of a plurality of vehicles that perform autonomous driving to a terminal, and includes a probability of collision calculating unit that calculates a probability of collision indicating a probability of the vehicles colliding with an object by a predetermined time of day, a selecting unit that selects, out of the videos of the plurality of cameras, video from a camera installed in a vehicle of which the probability of collision is highest, and a control unit for setting video quality of the video of the selected camera to be high.

Claims (39)

1. A video distribution device that distributes, to a terminal, one or more videos from a plurality of cameras installed in each of a plurality of vehicles that perform autonomous driving, the video distribution device comprising:

a probability of collision calculating unit, implemented using one or more computing devices, configured to calculate a probability of collision indicating a probability of the plurality of vehicles colliding with an object by a predetermined time of day;

a selecting unit, implemented using one or more computing devices, configured to select, among the one or more videos from the plurality of cameras, a video from a camera installed in a vehicle of which the probability of collision is highest; and

a controller configured to increase at least one of a frame rate or a resolution of the camera installed in the vehicle of which the probability of collision is highest to thereby increase video quality of the selected video.

2. The video distribution device according to claim 1 , wherein the controller is configured to distribute, among the one or more videos from the plurality of cameras, the selected video to the terminal.

3. The video distribution device according to claim 1 , wherein the controller is configured to reduce video quality of remaining videos among the one or more videos in accordance with communication quality between a communication network and the plurality of vehicles.

4. The video distribution device according to claim 1 , further comprising:

a probability of presence calculating unit, implemented using one or more computing devices, configured to calculate a probability of presence indicating a probability of the object being present in a predetermined region by the predetermined time of day,

wherein the probability of collision calculating unit is configured to calculate, for each of the plurality of vehicles, the probability of collision, using collision permissible/impermissible information decided regarding each type of the object in advance.

5. The video distribution device according to claim 4 , wherein the probability of collision calculating unit is configured to:

calculate the probability of collision without taking into consideration the probability of presence of the object in a case in which the collision permissible/impermissible information regarding the object is collision permissible, and

calculate the probability of collision taking into consideration the probability of presence of the object in a case in which the collision permissible/impermissible information regarding the object is collision impermissible.

6. The video distribution device according to claim 4 , wherein the video distribution device is configured to calculate the probability of presence by the probability of presence calculating unit each time of calculating the probability of collision by the probability of collision calculating unit.

7. A video distribution method of a video distribution device that distributes, to a terminal, one or more videos from a plurality of cameras installed in each of a plurality of vehicles that perform autonomous driving, the video distribution method comprising:

calculating a probability of collision indicating a probability of the plurality of vehicles colliding with an object by a predetermined time of day;

selecting, among the one or more videos from the plurality of cameras, a video from a camera installed in a vehicle of which the probability of collision is highest; and

increasing at least one of a frame rate or a resolution of the camera installed in the vehicle of which probability of collision is highest to thereby increase video quality of the selected video.

8. The video distribution method according to claim 7 , further comprising distributing, among the one or more videos from the plurality of cameras, the selected video to a terminal.

9. The video distribution method according to claim 7 , further comprising reducing video quality of remaining videos among the one or more videos in accordance with communication quality between a communication network and the plurality of vehicles.

10. The video distribution method according to claim 7 , further comprising:

calculating a probability of presence indicating a probability of the object being present in a predetermined region by the predetermined time of day,

wherein calculating the probability of collision comprises calculating, for each of the plurality of vehicles, the probability of collision, using collision permissible/impermissible information decided regarding each type of the object in advance.

11. The video distribution method according to claim 10 , wherein calculating the probability of collision comprises:

calculating the probability of collision without taking into consideration the probability of presence of the object in a case in which the collision permissible/impermissible information regarding the object is collision permissible, and

calculating the probability of collision taking into consideration the probability of presence of the object in a case in which the collision permissible/impermissible information regarding the object is collision impermissible.

12. The video distribution method according to claim 10 , wherein calculating the probability of presence comprises calculating the probability of presence each time of calculating the probability of collision.

13. A non-transitory computer recording medium storing a program, wherein execution of the program causes one or more computers to perform operations comprising:

calculating a probability of collision indicating a probability of a plurality of vehicles colliding with an object by a predetermined time of day;

selecting, among one or more videos from a plurality of cameras installed in each of the plurality of vehicles, a video from a camera installed in a vehicle of which the probability of collision is highest; and

increasing at least one of a frame rate or a resolution of the camera installed in the vehicle of which probability of collision is highest to thereby increase video quality of the selected video.

14. The non-transitory computer recording medium according to claim 13 , wherein the operations further comprise distributing, among the one or more videos from the plurality of cameras, the selected video to a terminal.

15. The non-transitory computer recording medium according to claim 13 , wherein the operations further comprise reducing video quality of remaining videos among the one or more videos in accordance with communication quality between a communication network and the plurality of vehicles.

16. The non-transitory computer recording medium according to claim 13 , wherein the operations further comprise:

calculating a probability of presence indicating a probability of the object being present in a predetermined region by the predetermined time of day, and

wherein calculating the probability of collision comprises calculating, for each of the plurality of vehicles, the probability of collision, using collision permissible/impermissible information decided regarding each type of the object in advance.

17. The non-transitory computer recording medium according to claim 16 , wherein calculating the probability of collision comprises:

calculating the probability of collision without taking into consideration the probability of presence of the object in a case in which the collision permissible/impermissible information regarding the object is collision permissible, and

calculating the probability of collision taking into consideration the probability of presence of the object in a case in which the collision permissible/impermissible information regarding the object is collision impermissible.

18. The non-transitory computer recording medium according to claim 16 , wherein calculating the probability of presence comprises calculating the probability of presence each time of calculating the probability of collision.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 4, 2024
From: TSUBAKI, TAKUMA; ISHIBASHI, RYOTA; NAKAHARA, YUKI; ONO, KOTARO; KUWAHARA, TAKESHI
To: NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 066633/0896 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230169862A1 · Jun 1, 2023
References Cited (13)
US 10466697B2 · Yunoki · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 11366477B2 · Hasegawa · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20210173400A1 · Hasegawa et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220277164A1 · Malayath · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230169862A1 · Tsubaki · 2023 [cited by examiner]
JP 2009094885 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009239673 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018167891 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
[No Author Listed], “Summary of Proceedings of the 3rd Investigation and Review Committee for the Phased Realization of Autonomous Driving,” Oct. 4, 2016, 11 pages (Machine Translation). [cited by applicant]
Director of Traffic Bureau, National Police Agency, “Regarding the formulation of “standards for handling road use permission applications related to public road demonstration experiments of remote automated driving sys… [cited by applicant]
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Chubu District Transport Bureau Automobile Technology and Safety Department Technology Division, “New remote-type demonstration experiment on last-mile autonomous … [cited by applicant]
monoist.itmedia.co.jp [online], “Establishment of a center for remote monitoring and operation so that driverless vehicles can be ridden with peace of mind,” Sep. 28, 2018, retrieved from URL<https://monoist.itmedia.co.… [cited by applicant]
monoist.itmedia.co.jp [online], “Remote monitoring of multiple self-driving cars by one person, “world's first” public road demonstration in Eiheiji Town, Fukui Prefecture,” Nov. 16, 2018, retrieved from URL<https://mon… [cited by applicant]