IP Library Granted Patent US 12,209,657
Granted Patent B2
US 12,209,657 · App. 18/512,495 · Granted Jan 28, 2025

Vehicle system with hydromechanical transmission and power management strategy

Inventors: Lorenzo Dalla Palma (Arco, IT); Fabio Gunsch (Arco, IT); Alessandro Dilisa (Arco, IT)
Assignee: DANA ITALIA S.R.L.
F16H61/4096B60K6/12B60K17/10B60K17/28F16H47/04F16H61/061F16H2061/0012F16H2061/0034F16H2061/124F16H61/21
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,209,657
App. No.
18/512,495
Granted
Jan 28, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods and systems for a hydromechanical transmission. In one example, a vehicle system includes a hydromechanical transmission with a power-take off (PTO) that is designed to rotationally couple to an implement. The vehicle system further includes an engine coupled to the hydromechanical transmission and a power-management control unit configured to, during a drive or coast condition, cause the power-management control unit to: determine a net available power for the hydromechanical transmission and manage a power flow between the hydromechanical transmission, a drive axle, and the implement based on the net available power.

Claims (40)

1. A transmission system, comprising:

a hydromechanical transmission configured to rotationally couple to a motive power source;

a power-take off (PTO) configured to rotationally couple to an implement; and

a power-management control unit in electronic communication with a vehicle control unit (VCU), an engine control unit (ECU), and an implements control unit (ICU) and including instructions that when executed, during a drive condition or a coast condition, cause the power-management control unit to:

receive power data from the VCU, the ECU, and the ICU;

determine a net available power for the hydromechanical transmission based on the power data; and

manage a power flow between the hydromechanical transmission, a drive axle, and the implement based on the net available power, a transmission power limit, an implement power limit, and a priority value;

wherein the priority value is a portion of the net available power to which the hydromechanical transmission is constrained;

wherein the transmission power limit and the implement power limit are adjusted based on a transmission traction request condition, an implement request condition, and a mixed transmission traction request and implement request condition; and

wherein during the mixed transmission traction request and implement request condition, the implement power limit is reduced based on the priority value and increased based on a proportional integral (PI) controller term.

2. The transmission system of claim 1 , wherein the motive power source is an engine.

3. The transmission system of claim 2 , wherein the hydromechanical transmission includes two forward drive clutches and a reverse drive clutch.

4. The transmission system of claim 2 , wherein the engine is a compression ignition engine.

5. The transmission system of claim 1 , wherein the hydromechanical transmission includes a hydrostatic assembly with a hydraulic pump and a hydraulic motor.

6. The transmission system of claim 1 , wherein the net available power includes a net positive available power value and a net negative available power value.

7. The transmission system of claim 1 , wherein the hydromechanical transmission is a hydromechanical variable transmission (HVT).

8. The transmission system of claim 7 , wherein the HVT has an asymmetric number of forward drive ranges and reverse drive ranges.

9. A method for managing power in a vehicle system, comprising:

at a power-management control unit, receiving power data from one or more of an engine control unit (ECU), a vehicle control unit (VCU), and an implement control unit (ICU);

determining a net available power for a hydromechanical transmission based on the power data; and

managing a power flow between the hydromechanical transmission, a drive axle, and an implement based on the net available power, a transmission power limit, an implement power limit, and a priority value;

wherein the priority value is a portion of the net available power to which the hydromechanical transmission is constrained;

wherein the transmission power limit and the implement power limit are adjusted based on a transmission traction request condition, an implement request condition, and a mixed transmission traction request and implement request condition; and

wherein during the transmission traction request condition the implement power limit is reduced based on the priority value.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein during the implement request condition the transmission power limit is equal to the priority value.

11. The method of claim 9 , wherein during the mixed transmission traction request and implement request condition the implement power limit is reduced based on the priority value and increased based on a proportional integral (PI) controller term.

12. The method of claim 9 , wherein the priority value is adjustable.

13. A transmission system, comprising:

a hydromechanical variable transmission (HVT) configured to rotationally couple to an internal combustion engine;

a power-take off (PTO) configured to rotationally couple to an implement; and

a power-management control unit in electronic communication with a vehicle control unit (VCU), an engine control unit (ECU), and an implement control unit (ICU) and including instructions that when executed, during a drive condition or a coast condition, cause the power-management control unit to:

receive power data from the VCU, the ECU, and the ICU;

determine a net available power for the HVT based on the power data; and

manage a power flow between the HVT, a drive axle, and the implement based on the net available power, a transmission power limit, an implement power limit, and a priority value;

wherein the priority value is a portion of the net available power to which the HVT is constrained;

wherein the transmission power limit and the implement power limit are adjusted based on a transmission traction request condition, an implement request condition, and a mixed transmission traction request and implement request condition; and

wherein during the transmission traction request condition the implement power limit is reduced based on the priority value.

14. The transmission system of claim 13 , wherein during the implement request condition the transmission power limit is equal to the priority value.

15. The transmission system of claim 13 , wherein during the mixed transmission traction request and implement request condition, the implement power limit is reduced based on the priority value and increased based on a proportional integral (PI) controller term.

16. The transmission system of claim 13 , wherein the priority value is adjustable.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 17, 2023
From: DALLA PALMA, LORENZO; GUNSCH, FABIO; DILISA, ALESSANDRO
To: DANA ITALIA S.R.L.
Reel/Frame 065599/0109 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 17449247 · Sep 28, 2021
Related Publication 20240084891A1 · Mar 14, 2024
References Cited (24)
US 3583256A · Livezey · 1971 [cited by examiner]
US 3714846A · Louis · 1973 [cited by examiner]
US 3719888A · Sampey · 1973 [cited by applicant]
US 3744344A · Olsen · 1973 [cited by examiner]
US 4075893A · Koch, Jr. · 1978 [cited by applicant]
US 4740898A · McKee et al. · 1988 [cited by applicant]
US 5487005A · Genise · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 7344473B2 · Ishibashi et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7832520B2 · Murakami et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8532888B2 · Ishibashi et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9145127B2 · Uematsu · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9512918B2 · Rozycki et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9562592B2 · Rekow et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10029556B2 · Morrow et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10071719B2 · Behm · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10407864B2 · Miyamoto et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20050071068A1 · Funato et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20100089050A1 · Filla · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20120004797A1 · Baino · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120324879A1 · Haugen · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130006457A1 · Anders et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20160024754A1 · Miyamoto et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170152928A1 · Byltiauw · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20220213951A1 · Cai et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]