IP Library Granted Patent US 12,239,407
Granted Patent B2
US 12,239,407 · App. 17/156,296 · Granted Mar 4, 2025

Adaptable surgical instrument control

Inventors: Frederick E. Shelton, IV (Hillsboro, OH); Jason L. Harris (Lebanon, OH); Chad E. Eckert (Terrace Park, OH); Andrèas N Ward (Cincinnati, OH)
Assignee: Cilag GmbH International
A61B34/77A61B17/28A61B2017/00075A61B2017/00207
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,239,407
App. No.
17/156,296
Filed
Jan 22, 2021
Granted
Mar 4, 2025
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3771
USPC
606/205
Abstract

A surgical computing system may receive usage data associated with movement of a surgical instrument and user inputs to the surgical instrument. The surgical computing system may receive motion and biomarker sensor data from sensing systems applied to the operator of the surgical instrument. The surgical computing system may determine, based on at least one of the usage data and/or the sensor data, a control feature for implementation by the surgical instrument. The surgical computing system may communicate the determined control feature(s) to the surgical instrument. The surgical instrument may modify its operation based on the control features.

Claims (103)

1. A surgical computing system comprising:

a processor configured to:

receive usage data associated with user inputs to a surgical instrument comprising an end effector, wherein the end effector comprises jaws for clamping tissue, and wherein the usage data from the surgical instrument comprises data associated with controlling the jaws;

receive sensor data from one or more sensing systems, the sensor data comprising biomarker data associated with one or more persons operating the surgical instrument;

determine, based on at least one of the usage data or the sensor data, a control feature for implementation by the surgical instrument, wherein the control feature for implementation by the surgical instrument comprises switching from load control of the jaws to position control of the laws; and

communicate an indication of the control feature to the surgical instrument, wherein the indication of the control feature communicates switching from load control of the jaws to position control of the jaws,

wherein load control of the jaws causes the jaws to apply a force for clamping tissue in response to application of force to a control trigger, and

wherein position control of the jaws causes the jaws to apply a force for clamping tissue without application of force to the control trigger.

2. The surgical computing system of claim 1 ,

wherein the usage data comprises data associated with operation of the surgical instrument by a healthcare professional; and

wherein the sensor data comprising biomarker data associated with one or more persons operating the surgical instrument comprises data associated with the healthcare professional operating the surgical instrument.

3. The surgical computing system of claim 1 ,

wherein data associated with controlling the jaws comprises data associated with a length of time a control position has been maintained; and

wherein the processor is configured to determine that the length of time the control position has been maintained exceeds a time threshold.

4. The surgical computing system of claim 1 ,

wherein the usage data further comprises first data associated with hand motion;

wherein the sensor data further comprises second data associated with hand motion;

wherein the processor is further configured to:

determine, based on at least one of the first data associated with hand motion or the second data associated with hand motion, a second control feature for implementation by the surgical instrument, the second control feature comprising gross control or fine control; and

communicate an indication of the second control feature to the surgical instrument.

5. The surgical computing system of claim 1 ,

wherein the usage data further comprises first data associated with user correction action;

wherein the sensor data further comprises second data associated with user correction action;

wherein the processor is further configured to:

determine, based on at least one of the first data associated with user correction action or the second data associated with user correction action, a second control feature for implementation by the surgical instrument, the second control feature comprising over-correction control; and

communicate an indication of the second control feature the surgical instrument.

6. The surgical computing system of claim 1 ,

wherein the usage data further comprises first data associated with tremors experienced by a person operating the surgical instrument;

wherein the sensor data further comprises second data associated with tremors experienced by the person operating the surgical instrument;

wherein the processor is further configured to:

determine, based on at least one of the first data associated with tremors experienced by the person operating the surgical instrument or the second data associated with tremors experienced by an operator of the surgical instrument, a second control feature for implementation by the surgical instrument the second control feature comprising stability control; and

communicate an indication of the second control feature to the surgical instrument.

7. The surgical computing system of claim 6 ,

wherein the processor is further configured to:

compare at least one of the first data and the second data to baseline data;

determine feedback associated with tremors, based on comparing the first data and the second data to baseline data; and

communicate the feedback.

8. The surgical computing system of claim 1 ,

wherein the usage data further comprises first fatigue data associated with fatigue experienced by a person operating the surgical instrument;

wherein the sensor data further comprises second fatigue data associated with fatigue experienced by the person operating the surgical instrument;

wherein the processor is further configured to:

determine, based on at least one of the first fatigue data or the second fatigue data, a second control feature for implementation by the surgical instrument, the second control feature comprising fatigue control; and

communicate an indication of the second control feature to the surgical instrument.

9. A surgical instrument comprising:

a control trigger, the control trigger configured to receive user input for controlling engagement with patient tissue; and

a processor configured to:

monitor user inputs to the control trigger, the user inputs to the control trigger being associated with controlling jaws for clamping tissue, the jaws being comprised in an end effector;

generate data associated with the user inputs to the control trigger, the data associated with the user inputs to the control trigger comprising data associated with controlling the jaws for clamping tissue;

send the data associated with the user inputs to the control trigger to a surgical computing system;

receive an indication of a control feature from the surgical computing system, the indication of the control feature comprising an indication of position control; and

modify operation of the surgical instrument in response to a user operation, based on the indication of the control feature, to switch from load control of the jaws to position control of the jaws,

wherein load control of the jaws causes the jaws to apply a force for clamping tissue in response to application of force to the control trigger, and

wherein position control of the jaws causes the jaws to apply a force for clamping tissue without application of force to the control trigger.

10. The surgical instrument of claim 9 ,

wherein the data associated with controlling the jaws for clamping tissue comprises data indicating a length of time the jaws have been maintained in a position.

11. The surgical instrument of claim 9 ,

wherein the processor is further configured to:

monitor second user inputs to the control trigger, the second user inputs to the control trigger fife associated with controlling the end effector;

generate second data associated with the second user inputs to the control trigger, wherein the second data associated with the second user inputs to the control trigger comprising data associated with hand motion;

send the second data associated with the second user inputs to the control trigger to a surgical computing system;

receive an indication of a second control feature from the surgical computing system, the indication of the second control feature comprising an indication of one of gross control or fine control; and

modify operation of the surgical instrument, based on the indication of one of gross control or fine control, to scale a rate the end effector is moved in response to user input controls.

12. The surgical instrument of claim 9 ,

wherein the processor is further configured to:

monitor second user inputs to the control trigger, the second user inputs to the control trigger associated with controlling the end effector;

generate second data associated with the second user inputs to the control trigger, the second data associated with the second user inputs to the control trigger comprising data associated with correcting a previous action implemented using the surgical instrument;

send the second data associated with the second user inputs to the control trigger to a surgical computing system;

receive an indication of a second control feature from the surgical computing system, the indication of the second control feature comprising an indication of over-correction control; and

modify operation of the surgical instrument, based on the indication of over correction control, to slow operation of the surgical instrument in response to user input.

13. The surgical instrument of claim 9 ,

wherein the processor is further configured to:

monitor second user inputs to the control trigger, the second user inputs to the control trigger being associated with controlling gig end effector;

generate second data associated with the second user inputs to the control trigger, the second data associated with the second user inputs to the control trigger comprising data associated with tremors experienced by an operator of the surgical instrument;

send the second data associated with the second user inputs to the control trigger to a surgical computing system;

receive an indication of a second control feature from the surgical computing system, the indication of the second control feature comprising an indication of stability control; and

modify operation of the surgical instrument, based on the indication of stability control, to lessen transmission of tremors to the end effector.

14. The surgical instrument of claim 13 ,

wherein the processor is further configured to receive feedback associated with tremors.

15. The surgical instrument of claim 9 ,

wherein the processor is further configured to:

monitor second user inputs to the control trigger, the second user inputs to the control trigger being associated with controlling the end effector;

generate second data associated with the second user inputs to the control trigger, the second data associated with the second user inputs to the control trigger comprising data associated with fatigue experienced by an operator of the surgical instrument;

send the second data associated with the second user inputs to the control trigger to a surgical computing system;

receive an indication of a second control feature from the surgical computing system, the indication of the second control feature comprising an indication of fatigue control; and

modify operation of the surgical instrument, based on the indication of fatigue control, to lessen adjust operation of the control trigger to compensate for fatigue.

16. A surgical computing system comprising:

a processor configured to:

receive usage data associated with user inputs to a surgical instrument comprising jaws for clamping tissue, the usage data being associated with controlling the jaws;

receive sensor data from one or more sensor systems, the sensor data comprising biomarker data associated with a healthcare professional operating the surgical instrument;

determine, based on at least one of the sensor data and the usage data, a control feature for implementation by the surgical instrument, the control feature for implementation by the surgical instrument comprising switching from load control of the jaws to position control of the jaws; and

communicate an indication of the control feature to the surgical instrument,

wherein load control of the jaws causes the jaws to apply a force for clamping tissue in response to application of force to a control trigger, and

wherein position control of the jaws causes the jaws to apply a force for clamping tissue without application of force to the control trigger.

17. The surgical computing system of claim 16 ,

wherein the sensor data comprises data associated with hand motion;

wherein the processor is further configured to:

determine, based on at least the data associated with hand motion, a second control feature for implementation by the surgical instrument, the second control feature comprising scalable control; and

communicate an indication of the second control feature to the surgical instrument.

18. The surgical computing system of claim 16 ,

wherein the sensor data comprises data associated with correction action by the healthcare professional;

wherein the processor is further configured to:

determine, based on at least the data associated with correction action by the healthcare professional, a second control feature for implementation by the surgical instrument, the second control feature comprising over-correction control; and

communicate an indication of the second control feature to the surgical instrument.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 27, 2021
From: ETHICON LLC
To: CILAG GMBH INTERNATIONAL
Reel/Frame 056601/0339 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 23, 2021
From: SHELTON, FREDERICK E., IV; HARRIS, JASON L.; ECKERT, CHAD E.; WARD, ANDRÉAS N.
To: ETHICON LLC
Reel/Frame 055371/0905 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220233267A1 · Jul 28, 2022
References Cited (121)
US 6491701B2 · Tierney · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 8696616B2 · Baynham et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8864009B2 · Shelton et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9072535B2 · Shelton et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9621357B2 · Williams et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9700317B2 · Aronhalt et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9974903B1 · Davis et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10065658B2 · Deligianni · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10535020B2 · Experton · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10813710B2 · Grubbs · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11099647B2 · Ang · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11543887B2 · Ang · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11728033B2 · Spenciner et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20020111830A1 · Tahan · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030139942A1 · Rakshit et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040071323A1 · Darzi et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20070136218A1 · Bauer et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080300915A1 · Molmenti et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20110152759A1 · Clymer et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120310670A1 · Pruitt · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20140081659A1 · Nawana et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140236159A1 · Haider et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140263541A1 · Leimbach et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140263551A1 · Hall et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140263552A1 · Hall et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140287393A1 · Kumar et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150302536A1 · Wahl et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160030240A1 · Gonenc et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160110504A1 · Fialkov · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170068785A1 · Experton et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170119300A1 · Conner · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170228501A1 · Turner, Jr. et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170258408A1 · Stapelfeldt · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170296213A1 · Swensgard et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180028088A1 · Garbey et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180168579A1 · Aronhalt et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180286521A1 · Fong · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180360452A1 · Shelton et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190013099A1 · Esterberg et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190059932A1 · Isosaki et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190079916A1 · Eyigoz · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190200844A1 · Shelton et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190200981A1 · Harris et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190201033A1 · Yates et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190201043A1 · Shelton, IV et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190201136A1 · Shelton et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190201137A1 · Shelton et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190206563A1 · Shelton, IV et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190206569A1 · Shelton et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190216452A1 · Nawana et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190258672A1 · Sadrieh · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190259476A1 · Armijos · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190392162A1 · Stern et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200168334A1 · Mowery · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200246081A1 · Johnson et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200268472A1 · Wolf et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200315734A1 · El Amm · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200394334A1 · Bulut et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200397515A1 · Frimer et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210007774A1 · Rodrigues et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210098088A1 · Hashimoto et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210241869A1 · Muse et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210259789A1 · Wright et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210313052A1 · Makrinich et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20230145790A1 · Walker et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
CN 111616803A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
EP 3501459A2 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
EP 3671305A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
EP 3671759A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
GB 2333882A · 1999 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019525276A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019177134A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2007096931A2 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017098503A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017147652A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020092701A2 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020180917A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021007418A2 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021126163A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Appelboom et al., “The Promise of Wearable Activity Sensors to Define Patient Recovery”, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 21, Jul. 1, 2014, pp. 1089-1093. [cited by applicant]
Chen et al., “Type of Pelvic Disease as a Risk Factor for Surgical Site Infection in Women Undergoing Hysterectomy”, Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, vol. 26, No. 6, Sep. 1, 2019, pp. 1149-1156. [cited by applicant]
Erowele et al., “Treatment Options for Postoperative Ileus”, US Pharmacist, vol. 35, 2010. [cited by applicant]
Sugino et al., “Surgical Task Analysis of Simulated Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with a Navigation System”, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, vol. 9, Jan. 14, 2014, pp. 825-836. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/156,287, filed Jan. 22, 2021, Shelton, et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/156,300, filed Jan. 22, 2021, Shelton, et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/156,304, filed Jan. 22, 2021, Shelton, et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/156,266, filed Jan. 22, 2021, Shelton, et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/156,318, filed Jan. 22, 2021, Shelton, et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/156,309, filed Jan. 22, 2021, Shelton, et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/156,306, filed Jan. 22, 2021, Shelton, et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/156,321, filed Jan. 22, 2021, Shelton, et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/156,281, filed Jan. 22, 2021, Shelton, et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/156,272, filed Jan. 22, 2021, Shelton, et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/156,279, filed Jan. 22, 2021, Shelton, et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/156,284, filed Jan. 22, 2021, Shelton, et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/156,282, filed Jan. 22, 2021, Shelton, et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/156,269, filed Jan. 22, 2021, Shelton, et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/156,286, filed Jan. 22, 2021, Shelton, et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/156,324, filed Jan. 22, 2021, Shelton, et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/156,329, filed Jan. 22, 2021, Shelton, et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/156,289, filed Jan. 22, 2021, Shelton, et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/156,293, filed Jan. 22, 2021, Shelton, et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/156,298, filed Jan. 22, 2021, Shelton, et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/156,274, filed Jan. 22, 2021, Shelton, et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/156,278, filed Jan. 22, 2021, Shelton, et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/062,509, filed Oct. 2, 2020, Shelton, et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 62/611,341, filed Dec. 28, 2017, Shelton, et al. [cited by applicant]
Aliverti, et al., “Wearable technology: role in respiratory health and disease”, Breathe, 2017, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kazamias, et al., “Blood pressure measurement with Doppler ultrasonic flowmeter”, Journal of Applied Physiology vol. 30, No. 4, Apr. 1971, 1 page. [cited by applicant]
Cerfolio, et a., “Prospective Randomized Trial Compares Suction Versus Water Seal for Air Leaks”, General Thoracic, May 1, 2001, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Brunelli, et al., “A Scoring System to Predict the Risk of Prolonged Air Leak After Lobectomy”, General Thoracic, 2010, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Jacob, et al., “Clinical applications of magnets on cardiac rhythm management devices”, European Society of Cardiology, May 26, 2011, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Carroll, et al., “Multi-Sensor Esophageal Temperature Probe Used During Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation is Associated with Increased Intraluminal Temperature Detection and Increased Risk of Esophageal In… [cited by applicant]
Singh, et al., “Esophageal Injury and Temperature Monitoring During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation”, American Heart Association, Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, vol. 1, issue 3, Aug. 1, 2008, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Nair, et al., “Atrioesophageal Fistula: a Review”, Journal of Atrial Fibrillation vol. 8, Issue 3, October Nov. 2015, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Drewry, et al., “Body temperature patterns as a predictor of hospital-acquired sepsis in afebrile adult intensive care unit patients: a case-control study”, Critical Care 2013, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Diduch, et al., “Synchronization of Data Streams in Distributed Realtime Multimodal Signal Processing Environments Using Commodity Hardware”, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kwon, et al., “Electrocardiogram Sampling Frequency Range Acceptable for Heart Rate Variability Analysis”, The Korean Society of Medical Informatics, 2018, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Pouchard, et al., “Open Standards for Sensor Information Processing”, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Jul. 2009, 49 pages. [cited by applicant]
Jinbin, , “Feedback Loops—Friend or Foe?”, Available at <https://medium.com/unpackai/feedback-loops-friend-or-foe-81a552203228>, Oct. 19, 2020, pp. 1-3. [cited by applicant]
Li, et al., “Attention-Aware Robotic Laparoscope for Human-Robot Cooperative Surgery”, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), Dec. 12, 2013, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]