IP Library Granted Patent US 12,246,728
Granted Patent B2
US 12,246,728 · App. 17/908,911 · Granted Mar 11, 2025

Safe driving determination apparatus

Inventor: Kazuhiko Yamaguchi (Fujisawa, JP)
Assignee: ISUZU MOTORS LIMITED
B60W40/09B60W40/105B60W50/14G06V20/597B60W2420/403B60W2540/229
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,246,728
App. No.
17/908,911
Granted
Mar 11, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A safe driving determination apparatus includes an angle value calculation part that calculates an angle value indicating a face direction angle of a driver with respect to the traveling direction, and a determination part that determines whether or not the driver is in a state of being inattentive to the road ahead on the basis of whether or not an integrated value of angle values during a past predetermined first determination period is equal to or greater than a threshold value, wherein the determination part does not determine that the driver is in a state of being inattentive to the road ahead if the angle value of the driver is less than a second threshold value at the present moment, even if an integrated value of angle values during a past predetermined first determination period is equal to or greater than a first threshold value.

Claims (11)

1. A safe driving determination apparatus for acquiring an angle value indicating a face direction angle of a driver by using a traveling direction of a vehicle as a reference after capturing an image of the driver of the vehicle with an imaging device to determine whether or not the driver is in a state of being inattentive to a road ahead on a basis of the acquired angle value, the apparatus comprising:

an angle value calculation part that calculates an angle value indicating a face direction angle of at least one of i) a face direction angle of the driver in a yaw direction with respect to the traveling direction or ii) a face direction angle of the driver in a pitch direction with respect to the traveling direction; and

a determination part that:

determines that the driver is in a state of being inattentive to the road ahead if an integrated value of angle values during a past predetermined first determination period is equal to or greater than a first threshold value and an angle value of the driver is equal to or greater than a second threshold value at a present moment; and

does not determine that the driver is in a state of being inattentive to the road ahead if the angle value of the driver is less than a second threshold value at the present moment, even if an integrated value of angle values during a past predetermined first determination period is equal to or greater than a first threshold value,

wherein the determination part does not determine that the driver is in the state of being inattentive to the road ahead even if the angle value at a second determination period, which is shorter than the first determination period, including the present moment, is equal to or greater than the second threshold value if a statistical value based on the angle values within the second determination period is less than a third threshold value.

2. The safe driving determination apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein, if the statistical value of the angle values in the second determination period is less than the third threshold value, the determination part does not determine that the driver is in a state of being inattentive to the road ahead even if the angle value is equal to or greater than the first threshold value.

3. The safe driving determination apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein the determination part determines a length of the second determination period on the basis of a speed of the vehicle at the present moment.

4. The safe driving determination apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein the determination part determines a length of the second determination period to be shorter when speed of the vehicle is high than when the speed of the vehicle is low.

5. The safe driving determination apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein the determination part determines the third threshold value on the basis of a speed of the vehicle at the present moment.

6. The safe driving determination apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein the determination part sets the third threshold value smaller when a speed of the vehicle is high than when the speed of the vehicle is low.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 1, 2022
From: YAMAGUCHI, KAZUHIKO
To: ISUZU MOTORS LIMITED
Reel/Frame 060972/0494 →
Priority Claims (1)
JP 2020-042077 · Mar 11, 2020 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230100810A1 · Mar 30, 2023
References Cited (40)
US 5867587A · Aboutalib · 1999 [cited by examiner]
US 6028608A · Jenkins · 2000 [cited by examiner]
US 6091334A · Galiana · 2000 [cited by examiner]
US 6097295A · Griesinger · 2000 [cited by examiner]
US 7027621B1 · Prokoski · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 9248796B2 · Takahashi · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 9460601B2 · Mimar · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 10640122B2 · Kishi · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10723365B2 · Kume · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11443534B2 · Takinami · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11661075B2 · Julian · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11861916B2 · Vedantam · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 11993277B2 · Julian · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20030146841A1 · Koenig · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20050073136A1 · Larsson · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20100033333A1 · Victor · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20140139655A1 · Mimar · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150094907A1 · Offenhaeuser · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20170313319A1 · Kishi · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20190102638A1 · Nanu · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190147265A1 · Aizawa · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190147269A1 · Aoi et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190283764A1 · Morimoto · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190337533A1 · Kume · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20210081754A1 · Frolova · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210347365A1 · Yamaguchi · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210350155A1 · Takinami · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210394775A1 · Julian · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220058407A1 · Yang · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220284718A1 · Kurokawa · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220301323A1 · Matsumura · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230227058A1 · Julian · 2023 [cited by examiner]
CN 109774723A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 2010257293A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 2012084068A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 2016018304A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
JP 2016081087A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
JP 2016207174A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
JP 6565305B · 2019 [cited by applicant]
Zhou Ming et al., “Research on the cause of the accident analysis and countermeasure of heavy duty truck right.” Automobile Applied Technology, 2017 No. 9. Published May 15, 2017. CNKI, Document Code A, Article ID: 1671… [cited by applicant]