IP Library Granted Patent US 12,246,761
Granted Patent B2
US 12,246,761 · App. 17/522,867 · Granted Mar 11, 2025

Adaptive vehicle control system

Inventors: James D. Brooks (Schenectady, NY); Harry Mathews, Jr. (Niskayuna, NY)
Assignee: Transportation IP Holdings, LLC
B61L15/0058B61L15/0018B61L15/0027B61L15/0072B61L27/04B61L27/14G05D1/0005G05D1/0061
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,246,761
App. No.
17/522,867
Granted
Mar 11, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A vehicle system having processors configured to determine regions of a trip where the vehicle system is permitted for a first mode of control. The permissible regions of the trip are determined based on one or more of parameters of a route, a trend of operating parameters of the vehicle system, or a trip plan that designates one or more operational settings of the vehicle system at different locations, different times, or different distances along a route. The processors also are configured to control transition of the vehicle system between a second mode of control and the second mode of control in the regions by alerting an operator of the vehicle system, automatically switching between the modes of control, or modifying conditions on which the transition occur.

Claims (31)

1. A vehicle control system comprising:

one or more processors configured to determine one or more operating parameters of a vehicle system that is moving according to a trip plan that designates throttle settings of the vehicle system at different locations, different times, or different distances along one or more routes, the one or more processors configured to identify one or more regions of a trip of the vehicle system for either a manual mode of control or autonomous mode of control of the vehicle system according to the trip plan based on the one or more operating parameters, the one or more processors configured to automatically switch control of the vehicle system between the manual mode of control and the autonomous mode of control based on the one or more operating parameters,

wherein the one or more operating parameters comprises one or more of a counted number of occurrences of a throttle change required by the trip plan for the vehicle system, or a rate of the counted number of occurrences of the throttle change required by the trip plan for the vehicle system.

2. The vehicle control system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more operating parameters also comprises a grade of the one or more routes.

3. The vehicle control system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more operating parameters also comprises a cant of the one or more routes.

4. The vehicle control system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more operating parameters comprises the counted number of occurrences of the throttle change that is designated by the trip plan or the rate of the counted number of occurrences of the throttle change of the vehicle system that is designated by the trip plan, the one or more processors configured to control switching of the vehicle system to the autonomous mode responsive to the counted number or the rate of the counted number being no greater than a second designated threshold, the one or more processors configured to control switching of the vehicle system to the manual mode responsive to the counted number or the rate of the counted number being greater than the second designated threshold.

5. The vehicle control system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more operating parameters also comprises a difference in fuel efficiencies between the autonomous mode of control and the manual mode of control.

6. The vehicle control system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more operating parameters also comprises an availability of a battery charging station along the one or more routes.

7. The vehicle control system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to automatically switch control of the vehicle system from the autonomous mode of control to the manual mode of control responsive to a traffic density exceeding a second designated threshold.

8. The vehicle control system of claim 7 , wherein the one or more operating parameters further comprises a geofenced area along the one or more routes indicative of the geofenced area having a population density that exceeds a first designated threshold.

9. A method comprising:

determining an operating parameter of a vehicle system;

identifying one or more regions of a trip plan of the vehicle system for either a manual mode of control or an autonomous mode of control of the vehicle system based on the operating parameter, the trip plan designating throttle settings of the vehicle system at different locations, different times, or different distances along one or more routes; and

automatically switching control of the vehicle system between the manual mode of control and the autonomous mode of control according to the trip plan based on the operating parameter,

wherein the operating parameter comprises a counted number of occurrences of a throttle change required by the trip plan for the vehicle system, or a rate of the counted number of occurrences of the throttle change required by the trip plan for the vehicle system.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the operating parameter also comprises a grade of the one or more routes.

11. The method of claim 9 , wherein the operating parameter also comprises a cant of the one or more routes.

12. The method of claim 9 , further comprising automatically switching the control of the vehicle system to the autonomous mode responsive to the counted number or the rate of the counted number being no greater than a second designated threshold, and

automatically switching the control of the vehicle system to the manual mode responsive to the counted number or the rate of the counted number being greater than the second designated threshold.

13. The method of claim 9 , wherein the operating parameter also comprises a difference in fuel efficiencies between the vehicle system operating under the autonomous mode of control and the vehicle system operating under the manual mode of control.

14. The method of claim 9 , wherein the operating parameter also comprises an availability of a battery charging station along the one or more routes, and

the method further comprises automatically switching control of the vehicle system from the autonomous mode of control to the manual mode of control responsive to the battery charging station being available along the one or more routes.

15. The method of claim 9 , wherein the operating parameter also comprises a traffic density, and

the method further comprises automatically switching control of the vehicle system from the autonomous mode of control to the manual mode of control responsive to the traffic density exceeding a first designated threshold.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein operating parameter also comprises a weather condition.

17. The method of claim 15 , wherein the operating parameter is a geofenced area along the one or more routes indicative of the geofenced area having a population density that exceeds a second designated threshold.

18. A vehicle control system, comprising:

one or more processors configured to count a number of throttle changes, a rate of the counted number of throttle changes, or both the counted number and the rate of the counted number of throttle changes that are required for a vehicle to move according to a trip plan that designates operational settings of the vehicle for one or more of different locations, different times, or different distances along one or more routes, the one or more processors configured to automatically switch operation of the vehicle between different modes based on the counted number of the throttle changes, the rate of the counted number of throttle changes, or both the counted number and the rate of the counted number of throttle changes.

19. The vehicle control system of claim 18 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to automatically switch operation of the vehicle between the different modes that comprise an automatic control mode of the vehicle and a manual control mode of the vehicle.

20. The vehicle control system of claim 18 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to automatically switch operation of the vehicle between the different modes that comprise a local control mode of the vehicle and a remote control mode of the vehicle.

21. The vehicle control system of claim 18 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to automatically switch operation of the vehicle between the different modes that comprise a performance mode of control of the vehicle and an efficiency mode of control of the vehicle.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 10, 2021
From: BROOKS, JAMES D.; MATHEWS JR., HARRY
To: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Reel/Frame 058068/0021 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 10, 2021
From: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
To: GE GLOBAL SOURCING LLC
Reel/Frame 058068/0199 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Nov 10, 2021
From: GE GLOBAL SOURCING LLC
To: TRANSPORTATION IP HOLDINGS, LLC
Reel/Frame 058084/0585 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation In Part 16450024 · Jun 24, 2019
Continuation 15482240 · Apr 7, 2017
Provisional Application 62469142 · Mar 9, 2017
Related Publication 20220063686A1 · Mar 3, 2022
References Cited (38)
US 5729619A · Puma · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 6822573B2 · Basir et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6903658B2 · Kane et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6927694B1 · Smith et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6945966B2 · Koenig · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 8698639B2 · Fung et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8952819B2 · Nemat-Nasser · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9834235B2 · Melas · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 10370012B2 · Brooks et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 11203365B2 · Brooks et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20050024212A1 · Hultzsch · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20070008151A1 · Victor et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20090261979A1 · Breed et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100222687A1 · Thijs et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20130171590A1 · Kumar · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140156133A1 · Cullinane · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140277878A1 · Manickaraj · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20170102700A1 · Kozak · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180203455A1 · Cronin · 2018 [cited by examiner]
CN 1784701A · 2006 [cited by applicant]
CN 1910593B · 2011 [cited by applicant]
CN 102902874A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
CN 104584084A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 104732251A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 104973054A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
DE 3826943A1 · 1990 [cited by applicant]
GB 2465439A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 2008223879A · 2008 [cited by applicant]
KR 20150007536A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2006000166A1 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015066445A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015174963A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015175435A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016044678A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
Eskandarian, Drowsy and Fatigued Driving Problem Significance and Detection Based on Driver Control Functions, Reference work Entry, pp. 941-974, 2012. [cited by applicant]
Shende et al., Driver Fatigue Detection System and the Status Transmission, International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 4, Issue 6, Jun. 2015. [cited by applicant]
Sinha et al., Real Time Implementation for Monitoring Drowsiness Condition of a Train Driver using Brain Wave Sensor, International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 139, Issue 9, Apr. 2016. [cited by applicant]
Maqbool, Driver Drowsiness Detection—The Technology Race in The Car to Keep the Driver Awake and Focused, http://www.tapedaily.com/technological-race-car-keep-driver-awake-focused/ retrieved on Nov. 2, 2016. [cited by applicant]