IP Library Granted Patent US 12,259,692
Granted Patent B2
US 12,259,692 · App. 17/625,010 · Granted Mar 25, 2025

Method for estimating the remaining service life of subject equipment

Inventors: Badr Mansouri (Moissy-Cramayel, FR); Romain Breuneval (Moissy-Cramayel, FR); Guy Clerc (Moissy-Cramayel, FR); Babak Nahid-Mobarakeh (Moissy-Cramayel, FR)
Assignees: CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE; SAFRAN ELECTRONICS & DEFENSE
G05B13/026G07C3/005
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,259,692
App. No.
17/625,010
Granted
Mar 25, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for estimating a Remaining Useful Life of a subject equipment, with a preliminary phase including the following steps: acquire test observations (step 10 ) and produce test time series (S x ) of at least one signature; partition the test time series to obtain severity classes corresponding to the ageing phases of the test equipment devices (step 14 ); carry out an initial learning of a diagnosis model on the test equipment devices (step 45 ); perform a second learning of a signature prediction model (step 51 ). There is also an operational phase including the following steps: acquire observations when in operation on the subject equipment and produce an extrapolated time series using the prediction model; classify the extrapolated time series using the diagnosis model and derive the remaining useful life of the subject equipment.

Claims (146)

1. A method for estimating a Remaining Useful Life of a subject equipment, comprising a preliminary phase comprising the following steps:

acquire test observations on test equipment devices ( 1 a , 1 b , 1 c , 1 d ) similar to the subject equipment (step 10 );

produce, from the test observations, test time series (S x ) of at least one signature;

partition the test time series to obtain severity classes corresponding to ageing phases of the test equipment devices (step 14 );

carry out a first learning of a diagnosis model on the test equipment devices (step 45 );

perform a second learning of a prediction model of the signature (step 51 ); and an operational phase comprising the following steps:

acquire observations when in operation on the subject equipment;

produce an extrapolated time series representative of the evolution of the signature on the subject equipment using the prediction model;

classify the extrapolated time series using the diagnosis model;

calculate a membership function of the extrapolated time series to the severity classes;

deduce, from the membership function, the Remaining Useful Life of the subject equipment, the estimated Remaining Useful Life being such that:

= q−t

where q is an estimated end-of-life time and t is a current time, and where, at the estimated end-of-life time q, the last severity class membership function becomes greater than the penultimate severity class membership function.

2. The estimation method according to claim 1 , wherein a temporal consistency criterion is used to define a number of severity classes produced by the partitioning.

3. The estimation method according to claim 2 , wherein the temporal consistency criterion is evaluated using a first metric defined by:

CT

k

=

i

=

2

m

u

ct

(

x

k

(

i

)

,

x

k

(

i

-

1

)

)

where x k (i) is an i th test observation acquired for the test equipment device k and where ct is a temporal consistency between two successive test observations and is defined using the following formula:

ct

(

x

k

(

i

)

,

x

k

(

i

-

1

)

)

=

{

1

,

si

y

k

(

i

)

=

y

k

(

i

-

1

)

0

,

si

y

k

(

i

)

y

k

(

i

-

1

)

where y k (i) is the severity class of the observation x k (i) .

4. The estimation method according to claim 1 , wherein a second metric, which is an energy metric, is evaluated to select a partitioning algorithm.

5. The estimation method according to claim 4 , wherein the energy metric is defined as:

E

par

=

1

2

i

{

1

,

,

c

}

x

(

j

)

Ω

i

x

(

j

)

-

g

i

d

2

where Ω i is a set of test observations of an i th class, the x (j) ∈R p are the test observations, g i is a centre of gravity of the i th severity class, dis a distance measure and is defined by:

d ij 2 =d ( x (j) ,g i ) 2 =∥x (j) −g i ∥ d 2 =( x (j) −g i ) T A d ( x (j) −g i )

where A d is a positive semidefinite matrix defining a distance metric, and where the symbol “∥ ∥ d ” represents the norm corresponding to the distance d.

6. The estimation method according to claim 4 , wherein the partitioning algorithm is a C-Fuzzy Mean algorithm.

7. The estimation method according to claim 1 , wherein the prediction model is trained with a multi-step iterative method.

8. The estimation method according to claim 1 , wherein the prediction model is constructed from a non-linear SVR regression.

9. The estimation method according to claim 1 , wherein the first learning of the diagnosis model uses a Fuzzy SVM-FA classification algorithm.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 26, 2022
From: MANSOURI, BADR; BREUNEVAL, ROMAIN; CLERC, GUY; NAHID MOBARAKEH, BABAK
To: CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE; SAFRAN ELECTRONICS & DEFENSE
Reel/Frame 058781/0001 →
Priority Claims (1)
FR 1907561 · Jul 5, 2019 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220260957A1 · Aug 18, 2022
References Cited (9)
US 10753192B2 · Eslinger · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20080183404A1 · Emami · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080208487A1 · Goebel · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20160202693A1 · Noda · 2016 [cited by examiner]
Moghaddass et al., “An integrated framework for online diagnostic and prognostic health monitoring using a multistate deterioration process.”, Realiability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier Applied Science, vol. 1… [cited by applicant]
Miao et al., “Condition multi-classification and evaluation of system degradation process using an improved support vector machine,” Microelectronics and Redliability, vol. 75, Apr. 25, 2017, pageds 223-232. [cited by applicant]
Cannarile et al., “An unsupervised clustering method for assessing the degradation state of cutting tools used in the packaging industry,” Safety and Reliability—Theory and Applications, Jun. 2017, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Shen et al., “A Monotonic Degradation Assessment Index of Rolling Bearings Using Fuzzy Support Vector Data Description and Running Time,” Sensors, vol. 12, No. 8, Jul. 26, 2012, pp. 10109-10135. [cited by applicant]
Pan et al., “A Hybrid Model for Bearing Performance Degradation Assessement based on Support Vector Data Description and Fuzzy C-Means,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C, Journal of Mechani… [cited by applicant]