IP Library Granted Patent US 12,265,196
Granted Patent B2
US 12,265,196 · App. 17/977,994 · Granted Apr 1, 2025

Automatic landing of formation testing tools

Inventors: Sadeed Sayed (Singapore, SG); Ahmed Fouda (Houston, TX); Bin Dai (Katy, TX); Christopher Michael Jones (Houston, TX)
Assignee: Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.
G01V5/04E21B47/04E21B49/081G01N33/2823
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,265,196
App. No.
17/977,994
Granted
Apr 1, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method and system for correlating two or more logs. The method may include reviewing an openhole log to identify one or more depths within a wellbore for testing, disposing a fluid sampling tool into the wellbore, creating a correlation log with the fluid sampling tool, depth-matching the correlation log to the openhole log to create a relative shift table, and moving the fluid sampling tool to the one or more depths within the wellbore based at least in part on the relative shift table. The system may include a fluid sampling tool disposed in a wellbore to create a correlation log and an information handling system connected to the fluid sampling tool.

Claims (52)

1. A method comprising:

reviewing an openhole log;

identifying one or more depths within a wellbore for testing from the openhole log;

disposing a fluid sampling tool into the wellbore;

creating a correlation log with the fluid sampling tool;

depth-matching the correlation log to the openhole log to create a relative shift table; and

moving the fluid sampling tool to the one or more depths within the wellbore based at least in part on the relative shift table.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the depth-matching is performed with a window-based correlation, an edge-based matching, or a dynamic time warping.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the window-based correlation, the edge-based matching, or the dynamic time warping are used in a machine learning model to estimate one or more relative shifts that populate the relative shift table.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the window-based correlation comprises:

overlapping the correlation log and the openhole log;

computing a correlation between the correlation log and the openhole log;

identifying a depth shift to correlate between the correlation log and the openhole log;

interpolating and extrapolating additional depth points based at least in part on the depth shift; and

applying a depth correction to the correlation log.

5. The method of claim 2 , wherein the edge-based matching comprises:

identifying one or more significant features in the correlation log and the openhole log;

computing one or more depth shifts based at least in part on the one or more significant features between the correlation log and the openhole log;

computing a correlation between the correlation log and the openhole log using the one or more depth shifts;

interpolating and extrapolating additional depth points based at least in part on the correlation; and

applying a depth correction to the correlation log.

6. The method of claim 1 , the openhole log is formed from one or more gamma ray measurements, one or more resistivity measurements, one or more density measurements, one or more neutron measurements, or one or more borehole images.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the correlation log is formed in real-time.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the depth-matching is performed in real-time based at least in part on the correlation log.

9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising generating the correlation with a gamma ray sensor.

10. The method of claim 1 , further comprises aligning one or more significant features on the correlation log to the one or more significant features on the openhole log during the depth-matching.

11. The method of claim 1 , further comprising forming a dynamically calibrated depth panel from the relative shift table.

12. The method of claim 11 , further comprising landing the fluid sampling tool at the one or more depths when a difference between the dynamically calibrated depth panel and the one or more depths is below a threshold.

13. A system comprising:

a fluid sampling tool disposed in a wellbore to create a correlation log; and

an information handling system connected to the fluid sampling tool comprising at least one processing unit and at least one computer media to:

identify one or more depths within the wellbore for testing using an openhole log;

create the correlation log with the fluid sampling tool;

depth-match the correlation log to the openhole log to create a relative shift table; and

instruct the fluid sampling tool to move to the one or more depths within the wellbore based at least in part on the relative shift table.

14. The system of claim 13 , wherein the depth-match is performed with a window-based correlation, an edge-based matching, or a dynamic time warping.

15. The system of claim 14 , wherein the window-based correlation, the edge-based matching, or the dynamic time warping are used in a machine learning model to estimate one or more relative shifts that populate the relative shift table.

16. The system of claim 14 , wherein the information handling system further utilizes the window-based correlation to:

overlap the correlation log and the openhole log;

compute a correlation between the correlation log and the openhole log;

identify a depth shift to correlate between the correlation log and the openhole log;

interpolate and extrapolate additional depth points based at least in part on the depth shift; and

apply a depth correction to the correlation log.

17. The system of claim 14 , wherein the information handling system further utilizes the edge-based matching to:

identify one or more significant features in the correlation log and the openhole log;

compute one or more depth shifts based at least in part on the one or more significant features between the correlation log and the openhole log;

compute a correlation between the correlation log and the openhole log using the one or more depth shifts;

interpolate and extrapolate additional depth points based at least in part on the correlation; and

apply a depth correction to the correlation log.

18. The system of claim 13 , wherein the openhole log is formed from one or more gamma ray measurements, one or more resistivity measurements, one or more density measurements, one or more neutron measurements, or one or more borehole images.

19. The system of claim 13 , wherein the correlation log is formed in real-time and wherein the depth-match is performed in real-time based at least in part on the correlation log.

20. The system of claim 13 , wherein the information handling system further forms a dynamically calibrated depth panel from the relative shift table.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 17, 2022
From: SAYED, SADEED; FOUDA, AHMED; DAI, BIN; JONES, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL
To: HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
Reel/Frame 061963/0412 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240142657A1 · May 2, 2024
References Cited (36)
US 9638034B2 · Chen et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9798035B2 · Fouda et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9964659B2 · Fouda et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10301935B2 · Wang et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10329908B2 · Fox et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10392932B2 · Wilson et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10422913B2 · Fouda et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10816689B2 · Fouda et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10901115B2 · Kirkwood et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10920578B2 · San Martin et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11008853B2 · Jones et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11143779B2 · Ewe et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11199643B2 · Samson et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11280929B2 · Donderici et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20070061079A1 · Hu · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20150241591A1 · Burmester · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160327678A1 · Benson et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160341834A1 · Bartetzko et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20180017697A1 · Fouda et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180187543A1 · Wilson et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180216458A1 · Garcia · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180252100A1 · Ranjan et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180348398A1 · Wlodarczyk · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190196039A1 · Wilson et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200149387A1 · Stark et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210183009A1 · Fouda · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210304386A1 · Guner et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220106871A1 · Al Ibrahim · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220178244A1 · Fouda et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220178245A1 · Fouda et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016159997A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2022/050279 dated Jul. 20, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Dai, Bin, et al. “Auto-Navigation of Optimal Formation Pressure Testing Locations by Machine Learning Methods.” SPWLA 60th Annual Logging Symposium. OnePetro, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Le, Thai, et al. “A Machine-Learning Framework for Automating Well-Log Depth Matching.” Petrophysics—The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description 60.05 (2019): 585-595. [cited by applicant]
Umeonaku, Loretta, et al. “Realtime Aaquisition of Formation Pressure Data for Reservoir Characterization and Safe Drilling.” SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition. OnePetro, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Torres Caceres, Veronica Alejandra, et al. “Automated Log Data Analytics Workflow—The Value of Data Access and Management to Reduced Turnaround Time for Log Analysis.” Petrophysics—The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluat… [cited by applicant]