IP Library Granted Patent US 12,280,997
Granted Patent B2
US 12,280,997 · App. 18/213,984 · Granted Apr 22, 2025

Jerk reduction for lift trucks

Inventors: Nicholas M. Draayer (Portland, OR); Ryan McDermott (Fairview, OR); Edmund Stilwell (Oregon City, OR)
Assignee: Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc.
B66F9/07559B66F9/07504B66F9/0755B66F9/24B66F17/003
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,280,997
App. No.
18/213,984
Granted
Apr 22, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods can prevent or reduce jerk during operation of a materials-handling vehicle that is unloaded or carrying a load. The vehicle comprises one or more user input devices configured to receive from an operator a request to perform an action and a processor. The processor is configured to determine, before performing the action requested by the operator, a force acting on the load carried by the materials-handling vehicle as a result of the action requested by the operator. The processor determines whether the force would result in a jerk if the action is performed as requested. If it is determined that the force would result in a jerk, the action is modified so as to reduce the force. If it is determined that the force would not result in a jerk, the materials-handling vehicle performs the action as requested by the operator without modification to reduce the force.

Claims (47)

1. A system for improving operation of a materials-handling vehicle, the system comprising:

one or more user input devices configured to receive from an operator a request to perform an action; and

a processor within the materials-handling vehicle, wherein the processor is configured to:

determine, before performing the action requested by the operator, a magnitude of a force that would result by performing the action requested by the operator, wherein the force acts either on the materials-handling vehicle or on a load carried by the materials-handling vehicle, and wherein the force results from either initiation or termination of a movement of the materials-handling vehicle or a part of the materials-handling vehicle;

determine whether the magnitude of the force would exceed a threshold if the action is performed as requested, wherein whether the magnitude of the force would exceed the threshold is independent of whether the action would cause the materials-handling vehicle to become unstable;

in response to determining that the magnitude of the force would exceed the threshold, cause the materials-handling vehicle to perform the action modified so as to reduce the magnitude of the force and thereby not exceed the threshold; and

if it is determined in response to determining that the magnitude of the force would not exceed the threshold, cause the materials-handling vehicle to perform the action as requested by the operator without modification to reduce the magnitude of the force.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the magnitude of the force is computed based on a force vector and a moment of the force vector about a potential tip axis of the materials-handling vehicle.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the action requested by the user comprises stopping lowering a load carried by the materials-handling vehicle.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the action requested by the user comprises stopping raising a load carried by the materials-handling vehicle.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the action requested by the user comprises initiating lowering a load.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the action requested by the user comprises initiating raising a load.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the action requested by the user comprises accelerating the materials-handling vehicle.

8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the action requested by the user comprises decelerating the materials-handling vehicle.

9. The system of claim 1 , wherein the action requested by the user comprises initiating tilting a load.

10. The system of claim 1 , wherein the action requested by the user comprises stopping tilting a load.

11. The system of claim 1 , wherein the action modified so as to reduce the magnitude of the force is the action requested by the operator performed at a slower rate.

12. The system of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further configured to determine whether the action, if performed as requested, would cause the materials-handling vehicle to be unstable and, if so, modify the action to maintain stability of the materials-handling vehicle.

13. The system of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further configured to determine whether the action, if performed as requested, would cause a load to be pitched and, if so, modify the action to maintain stability of the load.

14. The system of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further configured to receive one or more vehicle values from one or more vehicle sensors, wherein the one or more vehicle values are associated with one or more conditions of the materials-handling vehicle, and wherein the magnitude of the force is determined based at least in part on the one or more vehicle values.

15. The system of claim 1 , further comprising:

a load weight sensor configured to measure a weight of a load, wherein the processor is configured to access the weight of the load measured by the sensor, and wherein the magnitude of the force is determined based at least in part on the weight of the load.

16. The system of claim 1 , further comprising:

a memory, coupled to the processor, in which is stored a weight of a load, and wherein the magnitude of the force is determined based at least in part on the weight of the load.

17. The system of claim 1 , wherein:

in response to determining that the magnitude of the force would exceed the threshold, the processor causes the materials-handling vehicle to perform the action modified so as to reduce the magnitude of the force, even though the action requested by the operator would not cause the vehicle to experience a force vector that is pointed at or beyond an edge of a stability polygon.

18. A method of improving operation of a materials-handling vehicle, the method comprising:

receiving from an operator a request to perform an action;

determining, before performing the action requested by the operator, a magnitude of a force acting on a load carried by the materials-handling vehicle, the materials-handling vehicle, or both as a result of the action requested by the operator, wherein the force acts either on the materials-handling vehicle or on a load carried by the materials-handling vehicle, and wherein the force results from either initiation or termination of a movement of the materials-handling vehicle or a part of the materials-handling vehicle;

determining whether the magnitude of the force would exceed a threshold if the action is performed as requested, wherein whether the magnitude of the force would exceed the threshold is independent of whether the action would cause the materials-handling vehicle to become unstable;

in response to determining that the magnitude of the force would exceed the threshold, causing the materials-handling vehicle to perform the action modified so as to reduce the magnitude of the force and thereby not exceed the threshold; and

in response to determining that the magnitude of the force would not exceed the threshold, causing the materials-handling vehicle to perform the action as requested by the operator without modification to reduce the magnitude of the force.

19. The method of claim 18 , wherein the action requested by the operator comprises one of initiating or stopping one of lowering of the load, raising of the load, accelerating the materials-handling vehicle, decelerating the materials-handling vehicle, or tilting of the load.

20. The method of claim 18 , wherein causing the materials-handling vehicle to perform the action modified so as to reduce the force comprises causing the materials-handling vehicle to perform the action at a slower rate.

21. The method of claim 18 , further comprising:

measuring a weight of the load; and

using the weight of the load to determine the magnitude of the force.

22. The method of claim 18 , wherein the conditional step of causing the materials-handling vehicle to perform the action modified so as to reduce the magnitude of the force is performed even though the action requested by the operator would not cause the vehicle to experience a force vector that is pointed at or beyond an edge of a stability polygon.

23. A non-transitory computer-readable medium having instructions stored thereon, wherein the instructions, in response to execution by a processor on board a materials-handling vehicle, cause the processor to improve operation of a materials-handling vehicle, the instructions comprising:

instructions to determine, in response to a request by an operator to perform an action requested, a magnitude of a force acting on a load carried by the materials-handling vehicle, the materials-handling vehicle, or both as a result of the action requested by the operator, wherein the force acts either on the materials-handling vehicle or on a load carried by the materials-handling vehicle, and wherein the force results from either initiation or termination of a movement of the materials-handling vehicle or a part of the materials-handling vehicle;

instructions to determine whether the magnitude of the force would exceed a threshold if the action is performed as requested, wherein whether the magnitude of the force would exceed the threshold is independent of whether the action would cause the materials-handling vehicle to become unstable;

instructions to cause, in response to determining that the magnitude of the force would exceed the threshold, the materials-handling vehicle to perform the action modified so as to reduce the magnitude of the force and thereby not exceed the threshold; and

instructions to cause, in response to determining that the magnitude of the force would not exceed the threshold, the materials-handling vehicle to perform the action as requested by the operator without modification to reduce the magnitude of the force.

24. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 23 , wherein the action requested by the operator comprises one of initiating or stopping one of lowering of the load, raising of the load, accelerating the materials-handling vehicle, decelerating the materials-handling vehicle, or tilting of the load.

25. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 23 , wherein the instructions to cause, in response to determining that the magnitude of the force would exceed the threshold, the materials-handling vehicle to perform the action modified so as to reduce the magnitude of the force comprise instructions to cause the action to be performed at a slower rate.

26. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 23 , wherein the instructions to determine, in response to a request by an operator to perform an action requested, a magnitude of a force acting on the load carried by the materials-handling vehicle as a result of the action requested by the operator comprise instructions to calculate the magnitude of the force using a weight of the load.

27. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 23 , wherein the instructions to cause, in response to determining that the magnitude of the force would exceed the threshold, the materials-handling vehicle to perform the action modified so as to reduce the magnitude of the force are executed even though the action requested by the operator would not cause the vehicle to experience a force vector that is pointed at or beyond an edge of a stability polygon.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jun 6, 2024
From: HYSTER-YALE GROUP, INC.
To: HYSTER-YALE MATERIALS HANDLING, INC.
Reel/Frame 067661/0617 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 26, 2023
From: DRAAYER, NICHOLAS M.; MCDERMOTT, RYAN P.; STILWELL, EDMUND
To: HYSTER-YALE GROUP, INC.
Reel/Frame 064056/0504 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 16552849 · Aug 27, 2019
Provisional Application 62725879 · Aug 31, 2018
Related Publication 20230331528A1 · Oct 19, 2023
References Cited (89)
US 4011492A · Murphy et al. · 1977 [cited by applicant]
US 4014218A · Brandt · 1977 [cited by applicant]
US 4074794A · Scholl · 1978 [cited by applicant]
US 4509127A · Yuki · 1985 [cited by examiner]
US 4511974A · Nakane et al. · 1985 [cited by applicant]
US 5816768A · Yoo · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 6050770A · Avitan · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6256566B1 · Kamiya et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6279686B1 · Kaup · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6385518B1 · Rickers et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6477455B2 · Panizzolo · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6985795B2 · Scotese · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7165643B2 · Bozem et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7216024B1 · Abels et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7706947B2 · Bozem et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8140228B2 · McCabe et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8543261B2 · Anderson et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8731785B2 · McCabe et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8744648B2 · Anderson et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9002557B2 · Goncalves et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9007178B2 · Nikitin et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9139408B2 · Alveteg · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9169110B2 · Gerdes et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9207673B2 · Pulskamp et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9222854B2 · Singh et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9358975B1 · Watts · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 10494789B2 · Berkemeier et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10507826B2 · Bort et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10782202B2 · Bonnet et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11305650B2 · Chandrasekar · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11760615B2 · Draayer et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11807508B2 · Draayer et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20070208483A1 · Rabin · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20100204891A1 · Biggerstaff · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20120239262A1 · Reinert et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130124041A1 · Belser et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20170123428A1 · Levinson et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180229988A1 · Gault et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20200071144A1 · Draayer et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200399105A1 · Draayer et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
AU 201400714A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
CN 116902879A · 2023 [cited by applicant]
EP 2045207A1 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
EP 2233427B1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
EP 3406536A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
EP 3059202B1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
GB 2290149A · 1995 [cited by applicant]
GB 2356624A · 2001 [cited by applicant]
GB 2356624B · 2001 [cited by applicant]
WO 2004069568A1 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
WO 2009130528A1 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO 2009130718A1 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015121818A2 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017050358A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
Emam et al., “A Monitoring Device of Forklifts Stability Triangle”, vol. 43, No. 2, XP002796846, DOI: 10.24874/mvm.2017.43.02.02; Retrieved from Internet: http://oaji.net/a rtides/2019/766-1557768611. pdf on Jan. 14, 20… [cited by applicant]
European Extended Search Report, for Appl. 19194545.0; Feb. 10, 2020. [cited by applicant]
First Office Action in Chinese Patent Application No. 201910822439.5; Mar. 2, 2022. [cited by applicant]
First Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 17/009,568; Aug. 26, 2022. [cited by applicant]
First Office Action, for Appl. 19194545.0; Mar. 29, 2023. [cited by applicant]
First Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/552,849 (May 4, 2022). [cited by applicant]
Machine translation WO2004069568 from espacenet. (Year: 2004). [cited by applicant]
Office Action, European Patent Office, Appl. No. 19194545.0 (Mar. 29, 2023). [cited by applicant]
Response to European Extended Search Report, for Appl. 19194545.0; filed Sep. 10, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Response to First Office Action, Chinese Pat. Appl. No. 201910822439.5 (Sep. 19, 2022). [cited by applicant]
Response to First Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/552,849 (Sep. 2, 2022). [cited by applicant]
Response to First Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/009,568 (Feb. 24, 2023). [cited by applicant]
Response to Second Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/552,849 (Feb. 24, 2023). [cited by applicant]
Second Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/552,849 (Dec. 2, 2022). [cited by applicant]
Second Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/009,568 (Mar. 3, 2023). [cited by applicant]
Toyota Forklifts, “Toyota Material Handling System of Active Stability (SAS)”; Jun. 9, 2017; XP054980153, Retrieved from Internet: www.youtube.com/watch?v=yOB7gAwBe6o; retrieved on Jan. 14, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Response to European Patent Office in EP 19194545.0 (Apr. 24, 2023). [cited by applicant]
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/552,849 (Mar. 3, 2023). [cited by applicant]
Response to Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/552,849 (Apr. 3, 2023). [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 16/552,849 (May 4, 2023). [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 16/552,849 (Jul. 24, 2023). [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 16/552,849 (Aug. 11, 2023). [cited by applicant]
Response to Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/009,568 (Apr. 3, 2023). [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 17/009,568 (Apr. 19, 2023). [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 17/009,568 (Jul. 24, 2023). [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 17/009,568 (Aug. 14, 2023). [cited by applicant]
Response to Office Action, European Pat. Appl. No. 19194545.0 (Apr. 24, 2023). [cited by applicant]
Office Action, EPO Pat. Appl. No. 19194545.0 (Aug. 2, 2023). [cited by applicant]
Response to Office Action, European Pat. Appl. No. 19194545.0 (Oct. 23, 2023). [cited by applicant]
Office Action, Chinese Pat. Appl. No. 201910822439.5 (Feb. 2023). [cited by applicant]
Response to Office Action, Chinese Pat. Appl. No. 201910822439.5 (Jun. 2023). [cited by applicant]
Grant Notice, Chinese Pat. Appl. No. 201910822439.5 (Jun. 12, 2023). [cited by applicant]
“Jerk (physics) explained,” Everything Explained Today, https://everything.explained.today/Jerk_(physics)/# :˜:text=Jerk%20%28also%20known%20as%20jolt%29%20is%20the%20rate,a%20vector%20quantity%20%28having%20both%20magn… [cited by applicant]
“Jerk (physics),” Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerk_%28physics%29 (viewed Sep. 30, 2024). [cited by applicant]
Quora, “What happens when you take the derivative of acceleration with respect to time?,” https://www.quora.com/What-happens-when-you-take-the-derivative-of-acceleration-with-respect-to-time (viewed Sep. 30, 2024). [cited by applicant]