IP Library Granted Patent US 12,299,656
Granted Patent B2
US 12,299,656 · App. 18/333,369 · Granted May 13, 2025

Machine-learned robot fleet management for value chain networks

Inventors: Charles H. Cella (Pembroke, MA); Teymour S. El-Tahry (Detroit, MI); Leon Fortin, Jr. (Providence, RI)
Assignee: STRONG FORCE VCN PORTFOLIO 2019, LLC
G06Q20/14B25J9/163B25J9/1653B25J9/1661B25J9/1671B25J9/1682B25J9/1697B29C64/386B29C64/393B33Y10/00B33Y50/00B33Y50/02G02B3/14G02B26/00G05B13/0265G05B13/042G05B17/02G05B19/402G05B19/4099G05D1/0027G05D1/0297G06F30/27G06N20/00G06N20/20G06Q10/06311G06Q10/0633G06T7/70H04L9/3239H04L9/50H04L63/1441G05B2219/32015G05B2219/40113G05B2219/49023G06F2113/10G06Q10/06G06Q10/0631G06Q10/063114G06Q10/06313G06Q10/06316G06Q10/0831G06Q10/0833G06Q10/087G06Q30/0201G06Q2220/00G06T2207/20081
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,299,656
App. No.
18/333,369
Filed
Jun 12, 2023
Granted
May 13, 2025
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3625
USPC
705/7.12
Abstract

A system includes a fleet resources data store that maintains a fleet resource inventory indicating fleet resources that can be assigned to perform tasks. For each fleet resource, the inventory indicates features of each fleet resource and a respective status. A set of task definitions is accessible to an intelligence layer to facilitate improving task definition based on feedback from task-specific outcomes. The system receives a job request for a robotic fleet to perform a job and determines a job definition data structure indicating a set of tasks to be performed for the job. The system applies an outcome of performing a task by a resource assigned to perform the task to a machine learning system of the intelligence layer that facilitates improving, based on the outcome, the set of task definitions. The system updates the set of task definitions based on a result of applying the machine learning system.

Claims (53)

1. A system, comprising:

a computer-readable storage system that stores:

a fleet resources data store that maintains a fleet resource inventory that indicates:

a plurality of fleet resources that can be assigned to perform at least one task in a set of tasks, and

for each respective fleet resource of the plurality of fleet resources, a set of features of the respective fleet resource and a status of the respective fleet resource; and

a set of task definitions that is accessible to an intelligence layer to facilitate improving task definition based on feedback from task-specific outcomes; and

a set of processors that executes a set of computer-readable instructions, wherein the set of processors collectively:

receives a job request for a robotic fleet to perform a job, wherein:

the robotic fleet includes a set of robot operating units,

at least one robot of the set of robot operating units includes a control interface module and a physical interface module, and

the control interface module controls the physical interface module;

determines a job definition data structure based on the job request, wherein the job definition data structure indicates a set of tasks that are to be performed in performance of the job;

determines a robotic fleet configuration data structure corresponding to the job based on the set of tasks and the fleet resource inventory, wherein the robotic fleet configuration data structure assigns a plurality of resources selected from the fleet resource inventory to the set of tasks indicated in the job definition data structure based on the set of task definitions, the respective set of features of each fleet resource, and the respective status of each fleet resource;

deploys the robotic fleet to perform the job, wherein performing the job includes performing at least one task by at least one resource of the plurality of resources assigned to perform the at least one task;

applies an outcome of performing the at least one task by at least one resource of the plurality of resources assigned to perform the at least one task to a machine learning system of the intelligence layer that facilitates improving, based on the outcome, the set of task definitions; and

updates the set of task definitions based on a result of applying the outcome to the machine learning system,

wherein:

the set of task definitions indicates a type of end effector of at least one robot operating unit of the set of robot operating units,

updating the set of task definitions includes communicating with the control interface module to update the type of end effector of the at least one robot operating unit of the set of robot operating units, and

updating the type of end effector includes controlling the physical interface module, by the control interface module, to update the type of end effector of the at least one robot operating unit of the set of robot operating units.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the outcome of performing the at least one task includes failure data associated with performing the at least one task.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the outcome of performing the at least one task is extracted from a job completion data set.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the outcome of performing the at least one task is determined by a workflow simulation system that simulates performing the at least one task.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein applying the outcome of performing the at least one task to the machine learning system includes applying the outcome to a deep learning system for optimizing a task definition or task assignment across fleet resources.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein an assignment of a plurality of resources selected from the fleet resource inventory to the set of tasks defined in the job definition data structure is further based on at least one of an environment of the job, a budget for the job, or a timeline for completion of the job.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the set of task definitions is updated for an instance of a fleet configuration data structure corresponding to the job.

8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the set of processors collectively updates a second set of task definitions for a second job based on a result of applying the outcome of performing the at least one task to the machine learning system.

9. The system of claim 1 , wherein the set of processors executes the set of computer-readable instructions cooperatively with at least one of a fleet configuration system, a fleet resource scheduling system, a fleet security system, or a fleet utilization system.

10. The system of claim 1 , wherein the machine learning system utilizes at least one neural network to facilitate improving the set of task definitions based on a set of features, including features extracted from the job request.

11. A method of assigning robotic fleet resources to tasks, comprising:

storing, in a computer-readable storage system, a fleet resource inventory that indicates a plurality of fleet resources that can be assigned to perform at least one task in a set of tasks, and for each respective fleet resource of the plurality of fleet resources, a set of features of the respective fleet resource and a status of the respective fleet resource;

storing, in the computer-readable storage system, a set of task definitions that is accessible to an intelligence layer to facilitate improving task definition based on feedback from task-specific outcomes;

receiving a request for a robotic fleet to perform a job, wherein:

the robotic fleet includes a set of robot operating units,

at least one robot of the set of robot operating units includes a control interface module and a physical interface module, and

the control interface module controls the physical interface module;

determining a job definition data structure based on the request, wherein the job definition data structure indicates a set of tasks that are to be performed in performance of the job;

determining a robotic fleet configuration data structure corresponding to the job based on the set of tasks and a fleet resource inventory, and for each respective fleet resource of the plurality of fleet resources, the fleet resource inventory indicates a set of features of the respective fleet resource, a set of configuration requirements of the respective fleet resource, and a status of the respective fleet resource, wherein the robotic fleet configuration data structure assigns a plurality of resources selected from the fleet resource inventory to the set of tasks defined in the job definition data structure based on the set of task definitions, the respective set of features of each fleet resource, and the respective status of each fleet resource;

deploying the robotic fleet to perform the job, wherein performing the job includes performing at least one task by at least one resource of the plurality of resources assigned to perform the at least one task;

applying an outcome of performing the at least one task by at least one resource of the plurality of resources assigned to perform the at least one task to a machine learning system of the intelligence layer that facilitates improving, based on the outcome, the set of task definitions; and

updating the set of task definitions based on a result of applying the outcome to the machine learning system, wherein:

the set of task definitions indicates a type of end effector of at least one robot operating unit of the set of robot operating units,

updating the set of task definitions includes communicating with the control interface module to update the type of end effector of the at least one robot operating unit of the set of robot operating units, and

updating the type of end effector includes controlling the physical interface module, by the control interface module, to update the type of end effector of the at least one robot operating unit of the set of robot operating units.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the outcome of performing the at least one task includes failure data associated with performing the at least one task.

13. The method of claim 11 , wherein the outcome of performing the at least one task is extracted from a job completion data set.

14. The method of claim 11 , wherein the outcome of performing the at least one task is determined by a workflow simulation system that simulates performing the at least one task.

15. The method of claim 11 , wherein applying the outcome of performing the at least one task to the machine learning system includes applying the outcome to a quantum optimization system for optimizing task definition or task assignment across fleet resources.

16. The method of claim 11 , wherein an assignment of a plurality of resources selected from the fleet resource inventory to the set of tasks defined in the job definition data structure is further based on at least one of an environment of the job, a budget for the job, or a timeline for completion of the job.

17. The method of claim 11 , wherein the set of task definitions is updated for an instance of a fleet configuration data structure corresponding to the job.

18. The method of claim 11 , further including updating a second set of task definitions for a second job request based on a result of applying the outcome of performing the at least one task to the machine learning system.

19. The method of claim 11 , further including operating cooperatively with at least one of a fleet configuration system, a fleet resource scheduling system, a fleet security system, or a fleet utilization system.

20. The method of claim 11 , wherein the machine learning system utilizes at least one neural network to facilitate improving the set of task definitions based on a set of features, including features extracted from a job request.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 7, 2023
From: CELLA, CHARLES H.; EL-TAHRY, TEYMOUR S.; FORTIN, LEON, JR.
To: STRONG FORCE VCN PORTFOLIO 2019, LLC
Reel/Frame 064180/0193 →
Priority Claims (2)
IN 202111029964 · Jul 3, 2021 · national
IN 202111036187 · Aug 10, 2021 · national
Continuity (4)
Continuation PCTUS2021064233 · Dec 17, 2021
Provisional Application 63185348 · May 6, 2021
Provisional Application 63127983 · Dec 18, 2020
Related Publication 20230339108A1 · Oct 26, 2023
References Cited (184)
US 6369954B1 · Berge · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 8078485B1 · Kraehmueller · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 8200527B1 · Thompson · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 8407078B1 · Caputo · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 9656387B2 · Mian · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9849785B1 · Ross · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10310500B1 · Brady · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10766137B1 · Porter · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10792810B1 · Beckman et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10815058B2 · Wolf · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11403120B1 · Vanderzee · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11407111B2 · Zhang et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11526823B1 · Ben-Tsvi et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20040162638A1 · Solomon · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20070271011A1 · Lee · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080024306A1 · Bomber · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20140365258A1 · Vestal · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150073594A1 · Trujillo · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160129592A1 · Saboo · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170057081A1 · Krohne et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170075944A1 · Overman · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170080566A1 · Stubbs · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170109834A1 · Shaaban · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170113348A1 · Monceaux · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170121959A1 · Kherat et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170125008A1 · Maisonnier · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170140524A1 · Karsenti · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170190119A1 · Dow · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170252924A1 · Vijayanarasimhan · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170279783A1 · Milazzo · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170285585A1 · Weast et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170297200A1 · Stubbs · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170326729A1 · Gros · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170329307A1 · Castillo-Effen · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170345140A1 · Zhang · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170351952A1 · Zhang · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180004202A1 · Onaga · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180018508A1 · Tusch · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180043532A1 · Lection et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180089563A1 · Redding et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180096175A1 · Schmeling · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180107969A1 · Trivelpiece · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180129192A1 · Murakami · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180129199A1 · Gustavsson · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180136633A1 · Small et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180154514A1 · Angle · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180158016A1 · Pandya · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180229744A1 · Manzari · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180307246A1 · Hodge · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180308069A1 · Starks · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180329399A1 · Neelakandan · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180361586A1 · Tan et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180373238A1 · Bergan et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190001573A1 · Gulbrandsen · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190007269A1 · Ackley · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190021795A1 · Crawford et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190025800A1 · Goyal et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190047356A1 · Ferguson · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190066041A1 · Hance · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190102667A1 · Bashkirov et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190105779A1 · Einav · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190138662A1 · Deutsch et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190279409A1 · Kim · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190303636A1 · Olivastri · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190324436A1 · Cella et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190340716A1 · Cella · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190369641A1 · Gillett · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190392355A1 · O'Malley · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200050408A1 · Wushour · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200103877A1 · Truong · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200103921A1 · Voorhies · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200171671A1 · Huang · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200175138A1 · Nordstrom · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200242538A1 · Whitman · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200258031A1 · Makhija · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200293822A1 · Anthony et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200306978A1 · Riek · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200341452A1 · Bi et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200344293A1 · Wolter · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200348662A1 · Cella · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200368913A1 · Scott · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200380080A1 · Glunz · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200401576A1 · Yerli · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210053229A1 · Yuan · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210056482A1 · Li · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210107177A1 · Giles · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210109790A1 · Yueqiang · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210133670A1 · Cella · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210138651A1 · Mcgregor · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210157312A1 · Cella · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210181762A1 · Zhao · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210182996A1 · Cella · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210188430A1 · Kisiler · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210237269A1 · Hvass · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210247776A1 · Faye et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210339388A1 · Kelch · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210339399A1 · Schluntz · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210400675A1 · Lee · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220016763A1 · Chen et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220029813A1 · Wakabayashi · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220036310A1 · Heinla · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220048186A1 · Sharma · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220152816A1 · Bordignon · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220187847A1 · Cella · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220196889A1 · Marinkovich · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220197306A1 · Cella · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220207462A1 · Verma · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220245574A1 · Cella · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220266445A1 · Dambman · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220269284A1 · Chen · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220308562A1 · Norman · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220317661A1 · Kaehler · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220388690A1 · Garnier · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230070378A1 · Hazan et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230078448A1 · Cella · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230083724A1 · Cella · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230098602A1 · Cella · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230102048A1 · Cella · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230110941A1 · Makhija · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230123322A1 · Cella · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230132449A1 · Cella · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230222454A1 · Cella · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230222531A1 · Cella · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230259878A1 · Jacquemart · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240118702A1 · Cella · 2024 [cited by examiner]
AU 2020101261A4 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CA 2999272A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 111159793A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
EP 3696622A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013119942A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020092446A2 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020142499A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022026079A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
Li, Zhi, Toward a Blockchain Cloud Manufacturing System as a Peer to Peer Distributed Network Platform, 2018, Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 54, p. 133-144. (Year: 2018). [cited by examiner]
Banziger et al., “Optimizing human-robot task allocation using a simulation tool based on standardized work descriptions”, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 31.7, Apr. 3, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Bilberg et al., “Digital twin driven human-robot collaborative assembly” CIRP annals 68.1, pp. 499-502, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Borangiu et al., “Digital transformation of manufacturing. Industry of the future with cyber-physical production systems”, Sci. Technology 23, pp. 3-37, Jan. 2020. [cited by applicant]
Min et al., “Maching learning based digital twin framework for production optimization in petrochemical industry”, International Journal of Information Management 49, pp. 502-519, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Lee et al., “Integration of digital twin and deep learning in cyber-physical systems: towards smart manufacturing”, IET Collaborative Intelligent Manufacturing 2(1), Mar. 2020. [cited by applicant]
Diemer, “Blockchain-Implications and Use Cases for Additive Manufacturing”, Frankfurt School Blockchain Center, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Guo et al., “A framework for personalized production based on digital twin, blockchain and additive manufacturing in the context of industry 4.0”, 2020 IEEE 16th International Conference on Automation Science and Engine… [cited by applicant]
Mandolla et al., “Building a digital twin for additive manufacturing through the exploitation of blockchain: A case analysis of the aircraft industry”, Computers in Industry 109, pp. 134-152, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Trouton et al., “3D opportunity for blockchain: Additive manufacturing links the digital thread”, Deloitte Insights, Nov. 17, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Butt, “Exploring the interrelationship between additive manufacturing and Industry 4.0”, Designs 4.2, Jun. 2020. [cited by applicant]
Mukherjee et al., “A digital twin for rapid qualification of 3D printed metallic components”, Applied Materials Today 14, pp. 59-65, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Craye et al., “Biovision: a biomimetics platform for intrinsically motivated visual saliency learning”, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Penumuru et al., “Identification and classification of materials using machine vision and machine learning in the context of industry 4.0”, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Jun. 2020. [cited by applicant]
Valluru et al., “Simulation and Analysis of Liquid Lens Behaviour for Machine Vision Applications—CA13 (AFT)”, 2019 30th Irish Signals and Systems Conference (ISSC), IEEE, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Schwarz et al., “RGB-D object recognition and pose estimation based on pre-trained convolutional neural network features”, 2015 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (IRCA). IEEE, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Written Opinion and International Search Report for international application No. PCT/US2021/064233, mailed Apr. 22, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Li, A mechanism for scheduling multi robot intelligent warehouse system face with dynamic demand, p. 470-473 (Year: 2018). [cited by applicant]
Yao, improving just-in-time delivery performance of IoT-enabled flexible manufacturing systems with AGV based material transportation, p. 1-6 (Year: 2020). [cited by applicant]
Tanwani et al., “A Fog Robotics Approach to Deep Robot Learning: Application to Object Recognition and Grasp Planning in Surface Decluttering”, 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Montreal, … [cited by applicant]
Blender et al., “Managing a mobile agricultural robot swarm for a seeding task”, IECON 2016—42nd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Oct. 23, 2016, pp. 6879-6886. [cited by applicant]
Hoebert et al., “Cloud-Based Digital Twin for Industrial Robotics”, Industrial Applications of Holonic and Multi-Agent Systems: 9th INternational Conference, HoloMAS 2019, Linz, Austria, Aug. 26-29, 2019, pp. 105-116. [cited by applicant]
Xu et al., Digital twin-based industrial cloud robotics: Framework, control approach and implementation, Journal of Manufacturing Systems 58, 2021, pp. 196-209. [cited by applicant]
Mourtzis, “Simulation in the design and operation of manufacturing systems: state of the art and new trends”, International Journal of Production Research, 58:7, Apr. 2, 2020, pp. 1927-1949. [cited by applicant]
Wilson, “Accenture: building suply chain resilience amidst COVID-19”, Supply Chain Magazine, May 17, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Schatteman, “Supply Chain Lessons from Covid-19: Time to Refocus on Resilience”, Bain & Company, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Ganeriwalla et al., “Three Paths to Advantage with Digital Supply Chains”, BCG Perspectives, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Deloitte, “Digital Technologies Drive Supply Chain Innovation”, CIO Journal , Sep. 26, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Kelly et al., “Supply chains and value webs”, Deloitte University Press, 2015. [cited by applicant]
IW Staff, “75% of Companies in ISM Virus Survey Report Supply Chain Disruptions”, Industry Week, Mar. 11, 2020. [cited by applicant]
MHI Deloitte, “8. 2019 MHI Annual Industry Report: Elevating Supply Chain Digital Consciousness”, 2019. [cited by applicant]
PwC, “PwC's COVID-19 CFO Pulse”, Jun. 2020. [cited by applicant]
CB Insights, “Supply Chain & Logistics Tech in Numbers” Powerpoint presentation; Jul. 2020. [cited by applicant]
O'Leary, “The Modern Supply Chain is Snapping”, The Atlantic, Mar. 19, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Bukova et al., “The Position of Industry 4.0 in the Worldwide Logistics Chain”, LOGI—Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, vol. 9, No. 1, 2018, pp. 18-23. [cited by applicant]
Lin et al., “Here's how global supply chains will change after COVID-19”, World Economic Forum, May 6, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Ferrantino et al., “Understanding Supply Chain 4.0 and its potential impact on global value chains”, Apr. 2017. [cited by applicant]
Anonymous, “AI Set to Drive Global Supply Chain Technology Market to $440 Billion by 2023”, ABI Research, Jan. 29, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Howells, “How the network economy is revolutionizing supply chains”, World Economic Forum, Jan. 14, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “Task Selection by Autonomous Mobile Robots in a Warehouse Using Deep Reinforcement Learning”, Proceedings of the 2019 Winter Simulation Conference, IEEE, 2019, pp. 680-689. [cited by applicant]
McKee et al., “Task-directed configuration of networked robotic agents”, Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE/RSJ Intl. Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems EPFL, Lauanne Switzerland, Oct. 2022, pp. 2752-2757. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “Toward a blockchain cloud manufacturing system as a peer to peer distrubuted network platform”, Robotics and Computer Intergrated Manufacturing 54 (2018), p. 133-144. [cited by applicant]
Duan et al., “Performance evaluation for robotic mobile fulfillment sustems with time-varying arrivals”, Computers & Industrial Engineering 158 (2021). [cited by applicant]
Nielsen et al., “Digital Twins and Blockchain—Proof of Concept”, Procedia CIRP, vol. 93, 2020, pp. 251-256. [cited by applicant]
Ferrer et al., “The blockchain: a new framework for robotic swarm systems”, Aug. 2, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “A mechanism for scheduling multi robot intelligent warehouse system face with dynamic demand”, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 31.2, Dec. 14, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Yao et al., “Improving just-in-time delivery performance of IoT-enabled fliexible manufacturing systems with AGV based material transportation” Sensors 20.21, Nov. 6, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for EP App 21907970.4, dated Nov. 12, 2024, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Morariu Cristina et al., “Machine learning for predictive scheduling and resource allocation in large scale manufacturing systems,” Computers In Industry, Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 120, May 12, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Min et al., “Machine learning based digital twin framework for production optimization in petrochemical industry”, International Journal of Information Management 49, pp. 502-519, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Sheuly et al., “Machine-Learning-Based Digital Twin in Manufacturing: A Bibliometric Analysis and Evolutionary Overview”, Applied Sciences, Jun. 27, 2022. [cited by applicant]