IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,327,211
Granted Patent B1
US 12,327,211 · App. 18/407,430 · Granted Jun 10, 2025

Systems and methods for seller category determination and providing tailored fulfillment management services

Inventor: Edwin Gar-Ho Woo (Austin, TX)
Assignee: Auctane, LLC
G06Q10/083G06Q10/08G06Q10/087G06Q30/02
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,327,211
App. No.
18/407,430
Granted
Jun 10, 2025
Kind
B1
Abstract

Systems and methods which provide for determining seller categorization information using various information available in and to a shipping management system and for applying the seller categorization information to the operation of the shipping management system to provide fulfillment management services tailored for the seller are described. A feature set optimization engine of embodiments may implement various rules for inferentially determining one or more categories/subcategories for sellers using information that is not directly seller industry or product category information but which is otherwise utilized and available for shipping management functionality of a shipping management system. The feature set optimization engine may intelligently apply the inferentially determined seller categorization information with respect to one or more features of the shipping management system using various rules to implement an appropriate fulfillment management feature set.

Claims (46)

1. A shipping management system comprising:

a processor; and

a memory storing one or more instruction sets which, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform operations, the operations comprising:

deriving seller categorization information based on seller information and a seller categorization mapping corresponding to a seller;

comparing the seller categorization information against a threshold confidence value;

recommending a fulfillment management feature set based on the seller categorization information that at least meets the threshold confidence value;

configuring one or more elements of a graphical user interface based on the recommended fulfillment management feature set being approved by the seller, wherein a configuration of the graphical user interface is tailored to the seller; and

providing the graphical user interface to a seller system for display to the seller.

2. The shipping management system of claim 1 , further comprising:

configuring one or more elements of a second graphical user interface based on a second fulfillment management feature set, wherein the configuring the one or more elements of the second graphical user interface is tailored to a second seller and is distinct from the configuring the one or more elements of the graphical user interface; and

providing the second graphical user interface to a second seller system for display to the second seller.

3. The shipping management system of claim 2 , wherein the one or more elements of the graphical user interface and the one or more elements of the second graphical user interface include one or more of: a control element, a data element, or a layout element.

4. The shipping management system of claim 2 , wherein the one or more elements of the graphical user interface and the one or more elements of the second graphical user interface include at least one common control element.

5. The shipping management system of claim 2 , wherein the seller information and the seller categorization mapping are distinct from second seller information and second seller categorization mapping used to derive the second fulfillment management feature set.

6. The shipping management system of claim 2 , wherein the fulfillment management feature set is distinct from the second fulfillment management feature set.

7. The shipping management system of claim 2 , wherein the configuring the one or more elements of the graphical user interface includes a first layout particular to the seller, and wherein the configuring the one or more elements of the second graphical user interface includes a second layout particular to the second seller.

8. The shipping management system of claim 1 , wherein the configuring the one or more elements of the graphical user interface includes one or more control elements particular to the seller.

9. The shipping management system of claim 8 , wherein the configuring the one or more elements of the graphical user interface includes configuring a display element with one or more shipping options tailored to the seller.

10. The shipping management system of claim 1 , the operations further comprising:

dynamically updating the fulfillment management feature set based on at least updated seller information.

11. A method comprising:

deriving, by a cloud-based system comprising a processor, seller categorization information based on seller information and a seller categorization mapping corresponding to a seller;

comparing, by the cloud-based system, the seller categorization information against a threshold confidence value;

recommending, by the cloud-based system, a fulfillment management feature set based on the seller categorization information that at least meets the threshold confidence value;

configuring, by the cloud-based system, one or more elements of a graphical user interface based on the fulfillment management feature set being approved by the seller, wherein the configuring the one or more elements of the graphical user interface is tailored to the seller; and

providing, by the cloud-based system, the graphical user interface to a seller system for display to the seller.

12. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

recommending, by the cloud-based system, a second fulfillment management feature set based on second seller categorization information that at least meets the threshold confidence value;

configuring, by the cloud-based system, one or more elements of a second graphical user interface based on the second fulfillment management feature set being approved by a second seller, wherein the configuring the one or more elements of the second graphical user interface is tailored to the second seller distinct from the seller; and

providing, by the cloud-based system, the second graphical user interface to a second seller system for display to the second seller.

13. The method of claim 12 , further comprising:

deriving, by the cloud-based system, the second seller categorization information based on second seller information and a second seller categorization mapping corresponding to the second seller.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the configuring the one or more elements of the graphical user interface includes a first layout displaying one or more first shipping options tailored to the seller, and wherein the configuring the one or more elements of the second graphical user interface includes a second layout displaying one or more second shipping options tailored to the second seller.

15. A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing one or more instruction sets which, when executed by a processing system including at least one processor, cause the processing system to perform operations, the operations comprising:

deriving seller categorization information based on seller information and a seller categorization mapping corresponding to a seller;

comparing the seller categorization information against a threshold confidence value;

recommending a fulfillment management feature set based on the seller categorization information that at least meets the threshold confidence value;

configuring one or more elements of a graphical user interface based on the recommended fulfillment management feature set being approved by the seller, wherein a configuration of the graphical user interface is tailored to the seller; and

providing the graphical user interface to a seller system for display to the seller.

16. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , the operations further comprising:

configuring one or more elements of a second graphical user interface based on a second fulfillment management feature set, wherein the configuring the one or more elements of the second graphical user interface is tailored to a second seller and is distinct from the configuring the one or more elements of the graphical user interface; and

providing the second graphical user interface to a second seller system for display to the second seller.

17. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 16 , wherein the one or more elements of the graphical user interface and the one or more elements of the second graphical user interface include one or more of: a control element, a data element, or a layout element.

18. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 16 , wherein the one or more elements of the graphical user interface and the one or more elements of the second graphical user interface include at least one common control element.

19. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 16 , wherein the seller information and the seller categorization mapping are distinct from second seller information and second seller categorization mapping used to derive the second fulfillment management feature set.

20. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 16 , wherein the fulfillment management feature set is distinct from the second fulfillment management feature set.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 13, 2024
From: WOO, EDWIN GAR-HO
To: AUCTANE, LLC
Reel/Frame 066453/0012 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 17342497 · Jun 8, 2021
Continuation 15873499 · Jan 17, 2018
References Cited (27)
US 6728948B1 · Baxter · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 7295990B1 · Braumoeller · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7389249B2 · Hsu · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7848953B2 · Kahlon et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8407110B1 · Joseph · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 9305281B2 · Waddington et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9779375B2 · Grabovski et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9830328B2 · Faith et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10262001B2 · Faith et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20030065574A1 · Lawrence · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040128204A1 · Cihla · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20050108106A1 · Tomlin · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20050144088A1 · Croke · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20050256787A1 · Wadawadigi et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20070078725A1 · Koszewski · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20080119949A1 · Gile et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080301009A1 · Plaster · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20100257015A1 · Molander · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20140019288A1 · Bossinakis · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160042315A1 · Field-Darragh · 2016 [cited by examiner]
EP 1094414A2 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
EP 1248414A2 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014150823A1 · 2014 [cited by examiner]
WO 2016022546A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
Peter et al “Supply Chain Management and Logistics Strategy Overview”, SAP, Oct. 2014pp. 1-31 (Year: 2017). [cited by examiner]
Kable (Outsourcing Ecommerce Order Fulfillment for Online Shoppers), Dec. 2016, Kable Packaging, pp. 1-4 (Year: 2016). [cited by applicant]
PR Web, “Order Fulfillment Services in the US Industry Market Research Report from IBISWorld Has Been Updated,” 2014, Online Visibility from Vocus, pp. 1-3, (Year: 2014). [cited by applicant]