IP Library Granted Patent US 12,328,151
Granted Patent B2
US 12,328,151 · App. 18/413,472 · Granted Jun 10, 2025

Machine learning-assisted adaptive antenna tuning

Inventors: Diego Calzolari (San Diego, CA); David Loweth Winslow (San Diego, CA); Guilherme Hoefel (San Diego, CA); John Boro (Encinitas, CA)
Assignee: QUALCOMM Incorporated
H04B17/12G06N3/045G06N3/08H04W8/24
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,328,151
App. No.
18/413,472
Granted
Jun 10, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Certain aspects of the present disclosure provide techniques for adaptively tuning a wireless data transmission system in an electronic device, including receiving one or more operating characteristics of a wireless data transmission system of a device; determining, using a wireless data transmission system configuration model, a target wireless data transmission system configuration based on the one or more operating characteristics; and implementing the target wireless data transmission system configuration in the wireless data transmission system.

Claims (65)

1. A method, comprising:

receiving one or more operating characteristics of an antenna of a device;

determining, using an antenna model, a target antenna tuner setting based on the one or more operating characteristics, wherein the antenna tuner setting comprises at least one of an aperture tuner setting or an impedance tuner setting; and

implementing the target antenna tuner setting in the antenna.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining, using a first estimator model, one or more estimated operating characteristics of the antenna using one or more virtual antenna tuner settings different from the target antenna tuner setting;

determining, using a second estimator model, one or more estimated performance metrics of the antenna based on the one or more estimated operating characteristics;

determining an actual performance metric based on the implemented target antenna tuner setting;

determining a best antenna tuner setting of the target antenna tuner setting and the one or more virtual antenna tuner settings based on the actual performance metric and the one or more estimated performance metrics; and

generating feedback data based on the determined best antenna tuner setting.

3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising updating the antenna model based on the feedback data.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the antenna model is a reinforcement learning model.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the feedback data comprises one of:

a reward signal for the reinforcement learning model if the target antenna tuner setting matches the best antenna tuner setting; or

a penalty signal if the target antenna tuner setting does not match the best antenna tuner setting.

6. The method of claim 4 , wherein the feedback data comprises the best antenna tuner setting.

7. The method of claim 2 , wherein the actual performance metric comprises an indicator provided by a network in wireless data communication with the device.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the indicator comprises at least one of:

a received signal received power (RSRP) metric;

a received signal received quality (RSRQ) metric;

a signal to noise metric (SNR/SINR); or

a received signal strength indicator (RSSI).

9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining an optimal tunecode for an impedance tuner based on the target antenna tuner setting.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more operating characteristics comprise:

a real impedance of the antenna;

an imaginary impedance of the antenna;

a frequency of a wireless data transmission system that includes the antenna; and

an antenna tuner state.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the antenna tuner setting comprises the aperture tuner setting.

12. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining a best antenna tuner setting of the target antenna tuner setting and one or more virtual antenna tuner settings based on an actual performance metric associated with the target antenna tuner setting and one or more estimated performance metrics associated with the one or more virtual antenna tuner settings.

13. An apparatus, comprising:

an antenna;

a memory comprising computer-executable instructions; and

one or more processors configured to execute the computer-executable instructions and, individually or collectively, cause the apparatus to:

receive one or more operating characteristics of the antenna;

determine, using an antenna model, a target antenna tuner setting for the antenna based on the one or more operating characteristics, wherein the antenna tuner setting comprises at least one of an aperture tuner setting or an impedance tuner setting; and

implement the target antenna tuner setting in the antenna.

14. The apparatus of claim 13 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to cause the apparatus to:

determine, using a first estimator model, one or more estimated operating characteristics of the antenna using one or more virtual antenna tuner settings different from the target antenna tuner setting;

determine, using a second estimator model, one or more estimated performance metrics of the antenna based on the one or more estimated operating characteristics;

determine an actual performance metric based on the implemented target antenna tuner setting;

determine a best antenna tuner setting of the target antenna tuner setting and the one or more virtual antenna tuner settings based on the actual performance metric and the one or more estimated performance metrics; and

generate feedback data based on the determined best antenna tuner setting.

15. The apparatus of claim 14 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to cause the apparatus to update the antenna model based on the feedback data, and wherein the antenna model is a reinforcement learning model.

16. The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the feedback data comprises one of:

a reward signal for the reinforcement learning model if the target antenna tuner setting matches the best antenna tuner setting; or

a penalty signal if the target antenna tuner setting does not match the best antenna tuner setting.

17. The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the feedback data comprises the best antenna tuner setting.

18. The apparatus of claim 14 , wherein the actual performance metric comprises an indicator provided by a network in wireless data communication with the apparatus.

19. The apparatus of claim 18 , wherein the indicator comprises at least one of:

a received signal received power (RSRP) metric;

a received signal received quality (RSRQ) metric;

a signal to noise metric (SNR/SINR); or

a received signal strength indicator (RSSI).

20. The apparatus of claim 13 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to cause the apparatus to determine an optimal tunecode for an impedance tuner based on the target antenna tuner setting.

21. The apparatus of claim 13 , wherein the one or more operating characteristics comprise:

a real impedance of the antenna;

an imaginary impedance of the antenna;

a frequency of a wireless data transmission system that includes the antenna; and

an antenna tuner state.

22. A non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising computer-executable instructions that, when executed by one or more processors of a processing system, cause the processing system to perform a method, the method comprising:

receiving one or more operating characteristics of an antenna of a device;

determining, using an antenna model, a target antenna tuner setting for the antenna based on the one or more operating characteristics, wherein the antenna tuner setting comprises at least one of an aperture tuner setting or an impedance tuner setting; and

implementing the target antenna tuner setting in the antenna.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 17, 2024
From: CALZOLARI, DIEGO; WINSLOW, DAVID LOWETH; HOEFEL, GUILHERME; BORO, JOHN
To: QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 066146/0082 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 17463290 · Aug 31, 2021
Related Publication 20240223286A1 · Jul 4, 2024
References Cited (6)
US 11522639B2 · Kim · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20170272108A1 · Filipovic · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20210136601A1 · Winslow et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210194548A1 · Pezeshki et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20230061864A1 · Calzolari et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion—PCT/US2022/075401—ISA/EPO—Dec. 7, 2022. [cited by applicant]