IP Library Granted Patent US 12,333,386
Granted Patent B2
US 12,333,386 · App. 18/048,574 · Granted Jun 17, 2025

Tunable interactions for implementing two-qubit gates, and extensible circuits built therefrom

Inventors: Agustin Di Paolo (Cambridge, MA); William D. Oliver (Lexington, MA); Catherine Leroux (Sainte-Julie, CA); Alexandre Blais (Sherbrooke, CA)
Assignees: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; SOCPRA SCIENCES ET GENIE S.E.C., A/S TransferTech Sherbrooke
G06N10/40G06N10/00H10N60/12
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,333,386
App. No.
18/048,574
Granted
Jun 17, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and method provide two-qubit gates and quantum computing circuits built therefrom. Pairs of qubits are inductively or capacitively coupled using a coupler that is driven using an off-resonant microwave drive. By controlling the drive, the ZZ interaction between the qubits can be precisely controlled. In particular, the interaction may be selectively reduced or suppressed, thereby isolating the qubits from each other, or the interaction may be increased to provide fast, controlled-Z, two-qubit gates with high fidelity. Moreover, qubits and couplers may be arranged according to their resonant frequencies into unit cells and replicated to arbitrary size, thereby forming a quantum computer.

Claims (28)

1. A system comprising:

a first qubit associated with a first resonant frequency;

a second qubit associated with a second resonant frequency;

a qubit coupler inductively or capacitively coupling the first qubit to the second qubit according to a ZZ interaction strength; and

a microwave driver for driving the qubit coupler with microwaves according to a driver power and a third driver frequency that is different than the first resonant frequency and the second resonant frequency,

wherein the microwave driver is configurable to selectively increase or decrease the ZZ interaction strength, and

wherein the microwave driver is configurable to reduce spurious interactions between the first qubit and the second qubit by selectively decreasing the ZZ interaction strength, and

wherein the microwave driver is configurable to form a two-qubit gate by selectively increasing the ZZ interaction strength, and

wherein the microwave driver is configurable for selectively tuning to obtain a given leakage rate, or a given gate speed, or a balance between a leakage rate and a gate speed.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein either the first qubit or the second qubit comprises a fixed-frequency transmon, or a tunable-frequency transmon, or a fluxonium.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the qubit coupler comprises a split-transmon, an inductively-shunted transmon, or a fluxonium.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the microwave driver is configurable by selectively tuning either the driver power, or the driver frequency, or both.

5. The system of claim 1 , further comprising one or more additional qubits, wherein the microwave driver is further configurable to selectively decrease a ZZZ interaction strength or a ZZZZ interaction strength between the first qubit, the second qubit, and the one or more additional qubits.

6. A method of tuning ZZ interactions between a first qubit and a second qubit that are inductively or capacitively coupled using a qubit coupler, the method comprising:

driving the qubit coupler using microwaves having a driver power, and having a driver frequency that is different than a resonant frequency of the first qubit and a resonant frequency of the second qubit;

tuning a resonant frequency of the qubit coupler to reduce spurious interactions between the first qubit and the second qubit by selectively decreasing the ZZ interaction strength; and

driving the qubit coupler to selectively increase the ZZ interaction strength, thereby forming a two-qubit gate,

wherein driving the qubit coupler selectively increases or decreases a ZZ interaction strength between the first qubit and the second qubit through the qubit coupler, and wherein driving the qubit coupler comprises selectively tuning to obtain a given leakage rate, or a given gate speed, or a balance between a leakage rate and a gate speed.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein driving the qubit coupler comprises selectively tuning either the driver power, or the driver frequency, or both.

8. The method of claim 6 , further comprising driving the qubit coupler to selectively decrease a ZZZ interaction strength or ZZZZ interaction strength between the first qubit, the second qubit, and one or more additional qubits.

9. A multi-qubit processor comprising:

a plurality of qubits, each qubit in the plurality of qubits being associated with a respective resonant frequency;

a plurality of qubit couplers, each qubit coupler in the plurality of qubit couplers being associated with a respective resonant frequency and inductively or capacitively coupling a respective pair of qubits in the plurality of qubits; and

a plurality of microwave drivers, each microwave driver configurable for driving a corresponding qubit coupler with microwaves according to a driver power and a driver frequency, the driver power and driver frequency being selected to reduce crosstalk between the qubits inductively coupled by the corresponding qubit coupler.

10. The multi-qubit processor of claim 9 , further comprising at least one qubit coupler that inductively or capacitively couples a first pair of qubits in the plurality of qubits to a second pair of qubits in the plurality of qubits.

11. The multi-qubit processor of claim 9 , wherein the plurality of qubits and the plurality of qubit couplers comprise a two-dimensional repeating pattern of unit cells, each unit cell having at least two qubits and at least one qubit coupler.

12. The multi-qubit processor of claim 11 , wherein each unit cell is characterized by a minimum Manhattan distance between qubits in the plurality of qubits, or couplers in the plurality of couplers, that have the same resonant frequency.

13. The multi-qubit processor of claim 9 , wherein at least one microwave driver is configured according to a driver power and driver frequency selected to minimize or cancel crosstalk between the qubits inductively coupled by the corresponding qubit coupler.

Assignments (6)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 16, 2022
From: DI PAOLO, AGUSTIN; OLIVER, WILLIAM D.
To: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Reel/Frame 062150/0453 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 16, 2022
From: LEROUX, CATHERINE; BLAIS, ALEXANDRE
To: UNIVERSITY OF SHERBROOKE
Reel/Frame 061788/0504 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 16, 2022
From: LEROUX, CATHERINE; BLAIS, ALEXANDRE
To: UNIVERSITY OF SHERBROOKE
Reel/Frame 061791/0110 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 16, 2022
From: DI PAOLO, AGUSTIN; OLIVER, WILLIAM D.
To: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Reel/Frame 061949/0518 →
CONFIRMATORY ASSIGNMENT Recorded Nov 16, 2022
From: UNIVERSITE DE SHERBROOKE
To: SOCPRA SCIENCES ET GENIE S.E.C. OF A/S TRANSFERTECH SHERBROOKE
Reel/Frame 061950/0058 →
CONFIRMATORY ASSIGNMENT Recorded Oct 27, 2022
From: UNIVERSITE DE SHERBROOKE
To: SOCPRA SCIENCES ET GENIE S.E.C OF A/S TRANSFERTECH SHERBROOKE
Reel/Frame 062256/0980 →
Continuity (3)
Provisional Application 63292634 · Dec 22, 2021
Provisional Application 63328947 · Apr 8, 2022
Related Publication 20240346350A1 · Oct 17, 2024
References Cited (76)
US 11244241B1 · Gambetta et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11615336B2 · Oliver et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20200287540A1 · Smith et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210272008A1 · Oliver et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220108200A1 · Suttle et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230401475A1 · Finck · 2023 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2018151929A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021178042A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
A Couped-Qubit Tavis Cummings Scheme for Prolonging Quantum Coherence Oct. 2013 Physical review A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics 91(1) DOI:10.1103/PhysRevA.91.012317 SourcearXiv A, De. [cited by examiner]
Tuneable hopping and nonlinear cross-Kerr interactions in a high-coherence superconducting circuit M. Kounalakis 1,2, C. Dickel1,2, A. Bruno1,2, N. K. Langford1,2,3 and G. A. Steele1 npj Quantum Information (2018) 4:38 … [cited by examiner]
Coatanea-Gouachet et al., “Electromagnetic Quench Detection in ITER Superconducting Magnet Systems”; IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 25, No. 3; Jun. 2015; 7 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Huang et al., “Localized Hotspot Detection for Quench Prevention in HTS Magnets Using Distributed Fiber Bragg Gratings”; Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 41, No. 22; Nov. 2023; 9 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Martovetsky et al., “ITER CS Quench Detection System and Its Qualification by Numerical Modeling”; IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 24, No. 3; Jun. 2014; 4 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/665,909, filed May 16, 2024, Winik et al. [cited by applicant]
Chu et al., “Coupler-Assisted Controlled-Phase Gate with Enhanced Adiabaticity;” Journal Article from Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 054020; Published Nov. 2, 2021; 22 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Stehlik et al., “Tunable Coupling Architecture for Fixed-Frequency Transmon Superconducting Qubits;” Journal Article from Physical Review Letters 127, 080505; Jan. 2021; 6 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. 312 Amendment filed on Feb. 2, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/188,461; 3 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 6, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/188,461; 7 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 18, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/188,461; 13 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Response to U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 18, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/188,461, filed Oct. 18, 2022; 7 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Final Office Action dated Nov. 17, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/188,461; 7 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Response to U.S. Final Office Action dated Nov. 17, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/188,461, filed Dec. 19, 2022; 6 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Arute et al.; “Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor”; Nature; vol. 574; Oct. 24, 2019; 7 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Barends et al.; “Diabatic gates for frequency-tunable superconducting qubits”; Physical Review Letters; vol. 123, No. 21; Nov. 19, 2019; 8 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Berke et al.; “Transmon platform for quantum computing challenged by chaotic fluctuations”; Nature Communications; May 6, 2022; 10 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Breuer et al.; “Adiabatic processes in the ionization of highly excited hydrogen atoms”; Zeitschrift fur Physik D Atoms, Molecules and Clusters; vol. 11; Mar. 11, 1989; 14 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Breuer et al.; “Transport of quantum states of periodically driven systems”; Journal de Physique (France); vol. 51; Apr. 15, 1990; 15 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Brink et al.; “Device challenges for near term super-conducting quantum processors: frequency collisions”; 2018 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM); Dec. 1, 2018; 3 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Caldwell et al.; “Parametrically activated entangling gates using transmon qubits”; arXiv:1706.06562v2; Dec. 8, 2017; 7 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Chen et al.; “Qubit architecture with high coherence and fast tunable coupling”; arXiv:1402.7367v1; Feb. 28, 2014; 10 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Chow et al.; “Complete universal quantum gate set approaching fault-tolerant thresholds with superconducting qubits”; arXiv:1202.5344v1; Feb. 23, 2012; 13 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Chow et al.; “Microwave-activated conditional-phase gate for superconducting qubits”; New Journal of Physics; vol. 15, Nov. 19, 2013; 11 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Di Paolo et al.; “Efficient modeling of superconducting quantum circuits with tensor networks”; npj Quantum Information; vol. 7, No. 11; 2021; 11 Pages. [cited by applicant]
DiCarlo et al.; “Demonstration of two-qubit algorithms with a superconducting quantum processor”; arXiv:0903.2030v2; May 4, 2009; 9 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Didier et al.; “Ac flux sweet spots in parametrically modulated superconducting qubits”; Physical Review Applied; vol. 12; Nov. 7, 2019; 11 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Ficheux et al.; “Fast logic with slow qubits: microwave-activated controlled-z gate on low-frequency fluxoniums”; American Physical Society; Physical Review X; vol. 11; May 3, 2021; 16 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Garcia-Ripoll et al.; “Quantum control of frequency-tunable transmon superconducting qubits”; arXiv:2022.10320v3; Jul. 20, 2020; 11 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Grifoni et al.; “Driven quantum tunneling”; Elsevier Science B.V.; Physics Reports; vol. 304; 1998; 126 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Gyneis et al.; “Moving beyond the transmon: Noise-protected superconducting quantum circuits”; American Physical Society; PRX Quantum; vol. 2; 2021; 15 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Hertzberg et al.; “Laser-annealing Josephson junctions for yielding scaled-up superconducting quantum processors”; Quantum Information; vol. 7, No. 1; Aug. 19, 2021; 8 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Hone et al.; “Time-dependent floquet theory and absence of an adiabatic limit”; arXiv:cond-mat/9706182v1; Jun. 17, 1997; 15 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Huang et al.; “Engineering dynamical sweet spots to protect qubits from 1/f noise”; Physical Review Applied 15, 034065; 2021; 19 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Hutchings et al.; “Tunable superconducting qubits with flux-independent coherence”; arXiv:1702.02253v2; Feb. 12, 2017; 17 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Johansson et al.; “Qutip: An open-source python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems”; Computer Physics Communications 183 1760-1772; 2012; 13 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Kandala et al.; “Demonstration of a high-fidelity CNOT gate for fixed-frequency transmons with engineered ZZ suppression”; arXiv:2011.07050v1; Nov. 13, 2020; 10 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Kjaergaard et al.; “Superconducting qubits: Current state of play”; Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics; vol. 11; Mar. 2020; 29 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Koch et al.; “Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the cooper pair box”; arXiv:cond-mat/0703002v2; Sep. 26, 2007; 21 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Krinner et al.; “Benchmarking coherent errors in controlled-phase gates due to spectator qubits”; arXiv:2005.05914v1; May 12, 2020; 9 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Krinner et al.; “Demonstration of an all-microwave controlled-phase gate between far-detuned qubits”; arXiv:2006.10639v1; Jun. 18, 2020; 10 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Ku, et al.; “Suppression of unwanted ZZ interactions in a hybrid two-qubit system”; arXiv:2003.02775v2; Apr. 9, 2020; 21 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Malekakhlagh et al.; “First-principles analysis of cross-resonance gate operation”; arXiv:2005.00133v2; May 5, 2020; 30 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Martinez-Garaot et al.; “Fast quasiadiabatic dynamics”; American Physical Society; Physical Review A; vol. 92; 2015; 6 Pages. [cited by applicant]
McKay et al.; “A universal gate for fixed-frequency qubits via a tunable bus”; arXiv:1604.03076v3; Dec. 19, 2016; 10 Pages. [cited by applicant]
McKay et al.; “Efficient Z-gates for Quantum Computing”; Physical Review A; vol. 96, No. 2; Aug. 31, 2017; 8 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Magesen et al.; “Effective Hamiltonian models of the cross-resonance gate”; arXiv:1804.04073v2; Feb. 25, 2019; 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Mitchell et al.; “Hardware-Efficient Microwave-Activated Tunable Coupling between Superconducting Qubits”; arXiv:2105.05384v1; May 12, 2021; 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Morvan et al.; “Optimizing frequency allocation for fixed-frequency superconducting quantum processors”; American Physical Society; Physical Review Research; vol. 4; Apr. 28, 2022; 6 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Motzoi et al.; “Simple pulses for elimination of leakage in weakly nonlinear qubits”; arXiv:0901.0534v3; Oct. 11, 2009; 4 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Mundada et al.; “Floquet-engineered enhancement of coherence times in a driven fluxonium qubit”; arXiv:2007.13756v1; Jul. 27, 2020; 12 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Murch et al.; “Quantum fluctuations in the chirped pendulum”; Nature Physics; vol. 7; Feb. 2011; 4 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Neely et al.; “Generation of three-qubit entangled states using superconducting phase qubits”; arXiv:1004.4246v2; Apr. 29, 2010; 9 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Paik et al.; “Experimental demonstration of a resonator-induced phase gate in a multiqubit circuit-qed system”; Physical Review letters; vol. 117, No. 25; Dec. 13, 2016; 13 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Pechal et al.; “Direct implementation of a perceptron in superconducting circuit quantum hardware”; American Physical Society; Physical Review Research; vol. 4; Sep. 8, 2022; 10 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Peskin et al.; “The solution of the time-dependent schrodinger equation by the (t, t') method: Theory, computational algorithm and applications”; The Journal of Chemical Physics; vol. 99, No. 6; Sep. 15, 1993; 7 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Petrescu et al.; “Accurate methods for the analysis of strong-drive effects in parametric gates”; arXiv:2017.02343v1 preprint; Jul. 6, 2021; 21 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Pop et al.; “Coherent suppression of electromagnetic dissipation due to superconducting quasiparticles”; Nature; vol. 508; Apr. 17, 2014; 18 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Rol et al.; “Time-domain characterization and correction of on-chip distortion of control pulses in a quantum processor”; Applied Physics Letters; vol. 116, No. 5; Dec. 20, 2019; 9 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Salis et al.; “Time-resolved tomography of a driven adiabatic quantum simulation”; Physical Review A; vol. 102, No. 6; 2020; 5 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Takita, et al.; “Demonstration of weight-four parity measurements in the surface code architecture”; arXiv:1605.0135v3; Apr. 28, 2017; 8 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Wei et al.; “Quantum crosstalk cancellation for fast entangling gates and improved multi-qubit performance”; arXiv:2106.00675v1; Jun. 1, 2022; 16 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Weinberg et al.; “Adiabatic perturbation theory and geometry of periodically-driven systems”; Elsevier, Science Direct; Physics Reports; vol. 00; 2017; 41 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Wood et al.; “Quantification and characterization of leakage errors”; Physical Review A 97, 032306; Mar. 8, 2018; 20 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Yan et al.; “Engineering Framework for Optimizing Superconducting Qubit Designs”; arXiv:2006.04130v1; Jun. 7, 2020; 6 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Yatsenko et al.; “Pulse-driven near-resonant quantum adiabatic dynamics: Lifting of quasidegeneracy”; arXiv:quant-ph/0312080v1; Dec. 9, 2003; 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al.; “Drive-induced nonlinearities of cavity modes coupled to a transmon ancilla”; arXiv:2016.09112v3; Mar. 8, 2022; 32 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al.; “Preparing quasienergy states on demand: A parametric oscillator”; Physical Review A; vol. 95, No. 5; May 16, 2017; 12 Pages. [cited by applicant]