IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,347,094
Granted Patent B1
US 12,347,094 · App. 18/497,918 · Granted Jul 1, 2025

Systems and methods for determining muscle fascicle fracturing

Inventors: Emily Arkfeld (St. Joseph, MO); Barry Wiseman (Olathe, KS); Matt England (Kansas City, MO)
Assignee: TRIUMPH FOODS, LLC
G06T7/0008G06V10/764G06V10/774G06T2207/10024G06T2207/20081G06T2207/30128
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,347,094
App. No.
18/497,918
Granted
Jul 1, 2025
Kind
B1
Abstract

The disclosure relates to methods and systems for determining one or more parameters, attributes, or characteristics in a meat sample using an iteratively trained detection model. In one embodiment, the methods and systems disclosed herein use automated methods to determine muscle fascicle fracturing. Methods and systems disclosed herein comprise processing one or more images of a meat sample captured with a data capture device; and using an iteratively trained detection model to determine an objective classification, including the presence or absence of muscle fascicle fracturing in the images of the meat sample.

Claims (12)

1. A method for determining an objective classification of a meat sample using an iteratively trained detection model, the method comprising:

receiving one or more images of the meat sample from a data capture device designed to capture the one or more images as the meat sample is moving on a transport system of a production line;

extracting an attribute from the one or more images of the meat sample, wherein the attribute includes visible boundaries at the perimysium;

processing the attribute using a processor of the iteratively trained detection model;

determining an objective classification of the meat sample by comparing the attribute to a training data set; and

generating an output of the iteratively trained detection model, wherein the output includes the objective classification of the meat sample.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the attribute includes an input vector representing a parameter of the meat sample.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the input vector can include one or more of the following: color of pixels of the meat sample, variation in color, visible spectrum colors, peaks of wavelengths detected in non-visible electromagnetic energy, presence and/or amount of non-meat tissue, a visible fascicle, perimysium boundaries, sagging fascicles, fascicle firmness, or a crack between fascicles.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the objective classification includes a presence or an absence of a muscle fascicle fracturing of the meat sample.

5. The method of claim 1 further comprising generating a notification using a notification system, wherein the notification can include the output of the iteratively trained detection model.

6. The method of claim 1 further comprising adjusting the data capture device to provide illumination consistency for the one or more images.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the meat sample is a pork loin.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 11, 2023
From: ARKFELD, EMILY; WISEMAN, BARRY; ENGLAND, MATTHEW
To: TRIUMPH FOODS, LLC
Reel/Frame 065533/0129 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation In Part 18048646 · Oct 21, 2022
Provisional Application 63270330 · Oct 21, 2021
References Cited (55)
US 4226540A · Barten et al. · 1980 [cited by applicant]
US 4908703A · Jensen et al. · 1990 [cited by applicant]
US 5215772A · Roth · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5944598A · Tong et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6099473A · Liu et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6104827A · Benn et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6198834B1 · Belk et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6317516B1 · Thomsen et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6751364B2 · Haagensen et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6891961B2 · Eger et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7929731B2 · Schimitzek · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7988542B1 · Yamase et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8260005B2 · Tomic et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8774469B2 · Subbiah et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9546904B2 · Pawluczyk et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9546968B2 · Cooke · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10323983B1 · Iyer et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10458965B1 · Iyer et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10806153B2 · Hanning et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20030072472A1 · Haagensen et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20110007151A1 · Goldberg · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110069872A1 · Martel · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110128373A1 · Goldberg · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20140079291A1 · Johnson · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20190110638A1 · Li et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200315192A1 · Eger · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210015113A1 · Aggarwal et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220108447A1 · Kayser et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220323997A1 · Pawluczyk et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
CA 2906948C · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 113077420A · 2021 [cited by examiner]
EP 2972152A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
EP 2972152A4 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
EP 3830550A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
EP 3830550A4 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
EP 4018180A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
MX 2007010351A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO 9114180A1 · 1991 [cited by applicant]
WO 2004017067A2 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
WO 2009087258A1 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014139003A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018078582A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019232113A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020035813A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020064075A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020104636A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021033012A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021033033A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Manias, “Scalars, Vectors and Tensors”, MATSE447 Lectures Notes, Dec. 24, 2012, https://web.archive.org/web/20121224161554/https://zeus.plmsc.psu.edu/˜manias/MatSE447/03_Tensors.pdf (Year: 2012). [cited by examiner]
J. A Bacus, Identification of Pork Meat Freshness Using Neural Networks,|2021 IEEE International Conference on Electronic Technology, Communication and Information (ICETCI), Aug. 27-29, 2021, pp. 402-405, Changchun, Chi… [cited by applicant]
Sun et al., Prediction of Pork Color Grade using Image Two-tone Color Ratio Features and Support Vector Machine, Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2016, pp. 593-598, vol. 11(9), Maxwell Scientific Publicat… [cited by applicant]
Sun et al., Prediction of Pork Fatty Acid Content using Image Texture Features, Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2016, pp. 644-647, vol. 12(11), Maxwell Scientific Publication Corp. [cited by applicant]
Sun et al., Prediction of pork color attributes using computer vision system, Meat Science, 2016, pp. 62-64, vol. 113, Elsevier Ltd. [cited by applicant]
Liu, Jeng-Hung, Computer Vision System as a Tool to Estimate Pork Marbling, A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the North Dakota State University of Agriculture and Applied Science, Jun. 2017, 96 pages. [cited by applicant]
Sun et al., Prediction of pork loin quality using online computer vision system and artificial intelligence model, Meat Science, 2018, pp. 72-77, vol. 140, Elsevier Ltd. [cited by applicant]