IP Library Granted Patent US 12,348,993
Granted Patent B2
US 12,348,993 · App. 17/791,603 · Granted Jul 1, 2025

Geolocating minimization of drive test (MDT) measurement reports (MRs) with missing satellite navigation system coordinates

Inventor: Josko Zec (Tallahassee, FL)
Assignee: Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)
H04W24/08H04W64/003
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,348,993
App. No.
17/791,603
Granted
Jul 1, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Geolocating Minimization of Drive Test (MDT) measurement reports (MRs) with missing satellite navigation system coordinates is disclosed. In some embodiments, a computing node receives a plurality of complete MRs corresponding to a plurality of user equipments (UEs), wherein each complete MR comprises satellite navigation system coordinates identifying a geographic location of the corresponding UE. The computing node then trains a machine learning (ML) model for estimating UE geographic locations based on the plurality of complete MRs, wherein the ML model maps radio frequency (RF) signatures of complete MRs to corresponding UE geographic locations. In some embodiments, a radio access node obtains the ML model from the computing node, and receives an incomplete MR corresponding to a UE. Upon determining that the second MR lacks satellite navigation system coordinates, the radio access node predicts the geographic location of the UE based on measurements in the incomplete MR and the ML model.

Claims (58)

1. A method for geolocating Minimization of Drive Test, MDT, measurement reports, MRs, with missing satellite navigation system coordinates, the method comprising, at a computing node:

receiving a plurality of complete MRs corresponding to a plurality of user equipments, UEs, wherein each complete MR of the plurality of complete MRs comprises satellite navigation system coordinates identifying a geographic location of a corresponding UE of the plurality of UEs; and

training a machine learning, ML, model for estimating UE geographic locations based on the plurality of complete MRs, wherein the ML model maps a plurality of radio frequency, RF, signatures of the plurality of complete MRs to corresponding UE geographic locations.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein each RF signature of the plurality of RF signatures comprise one or more measurements comprised in a complete MR of the plurality of complete MRs.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the plurality of complete MRs each further comprises:

a serving cell identifier for a serving cell of the corresponding UE;

a Reference Signal Received Power, RSRP, measurement for the serving cell of the corresponding UE; and

one or more non-serving cell identifiers and corresponding RSRPs for a corresponding one or more non-serving cells measured simultaneously with the serving cell of the corresponding UE; and

training the ML model is further based on the serving cell identifier, the RSRP measurement, and the one or more non-serving cell identifiers and the corresponding RSRPs of each complete MR of the plurality of complete MRS.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the plurality of complete MRs each further comprises a timing advance, TA, parameter indicating an estimated distance between the corresponding UE and the serving cell of the corresponding UE; and

training the ML model is further based on the estimated distance between the corresponding UE and the serving cell of the corresponding UE indicated by the TA parameter of each complete MR of the plurality of complete MRs.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the plurality of complete MRs each further comprises a timestamp and a call identifier; and

training the ML model is further based on excluding geolocations based on the timestamp and the call identifier of each complete MR of the plurality of complete MRs.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the ML model is based on one or more of a non-linear regression algorithm, a regression tree, and a neural network.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein each complete MR of the plurality of complete MRs comprises an MDT M 1 report.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, at a radio access node for a Radio Access Network, RAN, of a cellular communications system:

obtaining the ML model from the computing node;

receiving an incomplete MR corresponding to a UE;

determining that the incomplete MR lacks satellite navigation system coordinates identifying a geographic location of the UE; and

responsive to determining that the incomplete MR lacks the satellite navigation system coordinates, predicting the geographic location of the UE based on measurements comprised in the incomplete MR and the ML model.

9. A computing node for geolocating Minimization of Drive Test, MDT, measurement reports, MRs, with missing satellite navigation system coordinates, the computing node comprising:

a network interface; and

processing circuitry adapted to cause the computing node to:

receive a plurality of complete MRs corresponding to a plurality of user equipments, UEs, wherein each complete MR of the plurality of complete MRs comprises satellite navigation system coordinates identifying a geographic location of a corresponding UE of the plurality of UEs; and

train a machine learning, ML, model for estimating UE geographic locations based on the plurality of complete MRs, wherein the ML model maps a plurality of radio frequency, RF, signatures of the plurality of complete MRs to corresponding UE geographic locations.

10. A method performed by a radio access node for a Radio Access Network, RAN, of a cellular communications system to geolocate Minimization of Drive Test, MDT, measurement reports, MRs, with missing satellite navigation system coordinates, the method comprising:

obtaining a machine learning, ML, model for estimating user equipment, UE, geographic locations based on measurements comprised in an MR;

receiving an incomplete MR corresponding to a UE;

determining that the incomplete MR lacks satellite navigation system coordinates identifying a geographic location of the UE; and

responsive to determining that the incomplete MR lacks the satellite navigation system coordinates, predicting the geographic location of the UE based on measurements comprised in the incomplete MR and the ML model.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein obtaining the ML model for estimating UE geographic locations comprises receiving the ML model from a computing node.

12. The method of claim 10 , wherein obtaining the ML model for estimating UE geographic locations comprises:

receiving a plurality of complete MRs corresponding to a plurality of UEs, wherein each complete MR of the plurality of complete MRs comprises satellite navigation system coordinates identifying a geographic location of a corresponding UE of the plurality of UEs; and

training the ML model for estimating UE geographic locations based on the plurality of complete MRs, wherein the ML model maps a plurality of radio frequency, RF, signatures of the plurality of complete MRs to corresponding UE geographic locations.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein:

the plurality of complete MRs each further comprises:

a serving cell identifier for a serving cell of the corresponding UE;

a Reference Signal Received Power, RSRP, measurement for the serving cell of the corresponding UE; and

one or more non-serving cell identifiers and corresponding RSRPs for a corresponding one or more non-serving cells measured simultaneously with the serving cell of the corresponding UE; and

training the ML model is further based on the serving cell identifier, the RSRP measurement, and the one or more non-serving cell identifiers and the corresponding RSRPs of each complete MR of the plurality of complete MRs.

14. The method of claim 12 , wherein:

the plurality of complete MRs each further comprises a timing advance, TA, parameter indicating an estimated distance between the corresponding UE and the serving cell of the corresponding UE; and

training the ML model is further based on the estimated distance between the corresponding UE and the serving cell of the corresponding UE indicated by the TA parameter of each complete MR of the plurality of complete MRs.

15. The method of claim 12 , wherein:

the plurality of complete MRs each further comprises a timestamp and a call identifier; and

training the ML model is further based on excluding geolocations based on the timestamp and the call identifier of each complete MR of the plurality of complete MRs.

16. The method of claim 12 , wherein the ML model is based on one or more of a non-linear regression algorithm, a regression tree, and a neural network.

17. The method of claim 12 , wherein each complete MR of the plurality of complete MRs comprises an MDT M1 report.

18. A radio access node for a radio access network, RAN, of a cellular communications system enabled to geolocate Minimization of Drive Test, MDT, measurement reports, MRs, with missing satellite navigation system coordinates, the radio access node comprising:

a network interface; and

processing circuitry associated with the network interface, the processing circuitry adapted to cause the radio access node to:

obtain a machine learning, ML, model for estimating user equipment, UE, geographic locations based on measurements comprised in an MR;

receive an incomplete MR corresponding to a UE;

determine that the incomplete MR lacks satellite navigation system coordinates identifying a geographic location of the UE; and

responsive to determining that the incomplete MR lacks the satellite navigation system coordinates, predict the geographic location of the UE based on measurements comprised in the incomplete MR and the ML model.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 8, 2022
From: ZEC, JOSKO
To: TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
Reel/Frame 060459/0698 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230037992A1 · Feb 9, 2023
References Cited (30)
US 12133194B2 · Bennett · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20160021503A1 · Tapia · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20230037992A1 · Zec · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230041036A1 · Park · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230289615A1 · Vandikas · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230318749A1 · Lins De Medeiros · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240147335A1 · Soryal · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240172165A1 · Hirzallah · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240259984A1 · Ghazvinian Zanjani · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240276420A1 · Hirzallah · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240296382A1 · Wang · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240298193A1 · Nie · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240323745A1 · Hirzallah · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240340678A1 · Kollár et al. · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240340939A1 · Chang · 2024 [cited by examiner]
WO 2015135581A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017139961A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
Author Unknown, “LTE_DL_Src (Downlink Baseband Signal Source),” ADS 2008 Update 2, edadocs.software.keysight.com/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=6089837, Keysight Technologies, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Author Unknown, “Android v iOS market share,” deviceatlas.com/blog/android-v-ios-market-share, Sep. 2019, DeviceAtlas Limited, 27 pages. [cited by applicant]
Author Unknown, “Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Physical layer; Measurements (Release 16),” Technical Specification 36.214, Version 16.0.0, Dec. … [cited by applicant]
Author Unknown, “Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Medium Access Control (MAC) protocol specification (Release 15),” Technical Specification 36.321,… [cited by applicant]
Author Unknown, “Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Radio Resource Control (RRC); Protocol specification (Release 15),” Technical Specification 36.33… [cited by applicant]
Author Unknown, “Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (UTRA) and Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Radio measurement collection for Minimization of Dr… [cited by applicant]
Barber, D., “Geolocation of WiMAX Subscriber Stations Based on the Timing Adjust Ranging Parameter,” Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Dec. 2009, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Jarvis, et al., “Geolocation of LTE Subscriber Stations Based on the Timing Advance Ranging Parameter,” Military Communications Conference, 2011, pp. 180-187. [cited by applicant]
Kanazawa, et al., “Field Experiment of Localization based on Machine Learning in LTE network,” 88th Vehicular Technology Conference, Aug. 2018, IEEE, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Mondal, et al., “Performance Evaluation of MDT Assisted LTE RF Fingerprint Framework,” International Conference on Mobile Computing and Ubiquitous Networking, 2014, pp. 33-37. [cited by applicant]
Roth, et al., “On Mobile Positioning Via Cellular Synchronization Assisted Refinement (CeSAR) in LTE and GSM Networks,” 9th International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication Systems, Dec. 2015, IEEE, 8 pag… [cited by applicant]
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and Partial Search for International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2020/052333, mailed Nov. 24, 2020, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2020/052333, mailed Feb. 1, 2021, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]