Granted Patent
B2
US 12,361,313 · App. 18/722,894 · Granted Jul 15, 2025
Techniques for quantum error correction using multimode grid states and related systems and methods
Assignee:
Yale University
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Abstract
Techniques are described for implementing a class of multimode bosonic codes that protect against errors within an ancilla qubit coupled to a bosonic system, that can be realized experimentally. A logical qubit state is represented by the states of multiple different modes of one or more bosonic systems, which may include multiple modes of a single bosonic system and/or single modes from multiple bosonic systems. Techniques for correcting errors are also described. In particular, a series of operations are described that autonomously detect and correct errors by repeatedly performing a sequence of operations that are each applied to the multiple bosonic modes and/or to the ancilla qubit that is coupled to each of the bosonic modes. The codes allow ancilla errors to propagate to the modes of the bosonic system as correctable errors, where they can be corrected, instead of presenting as logical errors in the ancilla qubit.
Claims (34)
1. A method of operating a circuit quantum electrodynamics system that includes an ancilla qubit dispersively coupled to a multimode bosonic system having a plurality of modes and operating as a logical qubit, the method comprising:
repeatedly performing a sequence of operations that autonomously detect and correct quantum errors arising in a state of the ancilla qubit and/or in a state of the logical qubit, the sequence of operations comprising:
applying a first drive waveform to each of the plurality of modes of the multimode bosonic system, wherein the first drive waveform changes the state of the ancilla qubit dependent on whether an error has occurred in the state of the ancilla qubit and/or in the state of the logical qubit;
subsequent to applying the first drive waveform, applying a second drive waveform to the ancilla qubit; and
subsequent to applying the second drive waveform, applying a third drive waveform to each of the plurality of modes of the multimode bosonic system, wherein the third drive waveform corrects the error that occurred in the state of the ancilla qubit and/or in the state of the logical qubit.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the sequence of operations further comprises:
applying a fourth drive waveform to each of the plurality of modes of the multimode bosonic system, wherein the fourth drive waveform changes the state of the ancilla qubit dependent on whether an error has occurred in the state of the ancilla qubit;
subsequent to applying the fourth drive waveform, applying a fifth drive waveform to the ancilla qubit.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the sequence of operations further comprises applying a sixth drive waveform to the ancilla qubit to drive the ancilla qubit into an excited state.
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the multimode bosonic system comprises a plurality of distinct bosonic systems each having one or more modes.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the multimode bosonic system comprises a single bosonic system having a plurality of modes.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the ancilla qubit is a transmon qubit.
7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the multimode bosonic system comprises two microwave cavities coupled to the ancilla qubit.
8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the sequence of operations autonomously detect and correct quantum errors arising in the state of the ancilla qubit, and wherein the first drive waveform changes the state of the ancilla qubit dependent on whether an error has occurred in the state of the logical qubit.
9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising performing a plurality of quantum gates on a logical state of the logical qubit.
10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the plurality of quantum gates are performed interleaved with instances of the sequence of operations, such that the method comprises at least performing a first quantum gate, followed by performing the sequence of operations a first time, followed by performing a second quantum gate, followed by performing the sequence of operations a second time.
11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first drive waveform changes the state of the ancilla qubit by imparting a change of phase to the state of the ancilla qubit.
12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first drive waveform further changes a state of one or more modes of the multimode bosonic system.
13. A system, comprising:
a circuit quantum electrodynamics system that includes an ancilla qubit dispersively coupled to a multimode bosonic system having a plurality of modes and operating as a logical qubit;
at least one non-transitory computer readable medium storing a plurality of drive waveforms;
at least one controller configured to:
apply a first drive waveform of the plurality of drive waveforms to each of the plurality of modes of the multimode bosonic system, wherein the first drive waveform changes a state of the ancilla qubit dependent on whether an error has occurred in the state of the ancilla qubit;
subsequent to applying the first drive waveform, apply a second drive waveform of the plurality of drive waveforms to the ancilla qubit; and
subsequent to applying the second drive waveform, apply a third drive waveform of the plurality of drive waveforms to each of the plurality of modes of the multimode bosonic system, wherein the third drive waveform corrects the error that occurred in the state of the ancilla qubit.
14. The system of claim 13 , wherein the multimode bosonic system comprises a plurality of distinct bosonic systems each having one or more modes.
15. The system of claim 13 , wherein the multimode bosonic system comprises a single bosonic system having a plurality of modes.
16. The system of claim 13 , wherein the ancilla qubit is a transmon qubit.
17. The system of claim 13 , wherein the multimode bosonic system comprises two microwave cavities coupled to the ancilla qubit.
18. The system of claim 13 , wherein the at least one controller is further configured to:
apply a fourth drive waveform to each of the plurality of modes of the multimode bosonic system, wherein the fourth drive waveform changes the state of the ancilla qubit dependent on whether an error has occurred in the state of the ancilla qubit;
subsequent to applying the fourth drive waveform, apply a fifth drive waveform to the ancilla qubit.
19. The system of claim 13 , wherein the at least one controller is further configured to apply a sixth drive waveform to the ancilla qubit to drive the ancilla qubit into an excited state.
20. The system of claim 13 , wherein the first drive waveform changes the state of the ancilla qubit by imparting a change of phase to the state of the ancilla qubit.
Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST
Recorded Nov 26, 2024
From: ROYER, BAPTISTE
To: YALE UNIVERSITY
Reel/Frame 069409/0660 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application
63292608
· Dec 22, 2021
References Cited (242)
US 5323344A
· Katayama et al.
· 1994
[cited by applicant]
US 6128764A
· Gottesman
· 2000
[cited by applicant]
US 7498832B2
· Baumgardner et al.
· 2009
[cited by applicant]
US 8242799B2
· Pesetski et al.
· 2012
[cited by applicant]
US 8294138B2
· Farinelli et al.
· 2012
[cited by applicant]
US 8508280B2
· Naaman et al.
· 2013
[cited by applicant]
US 9152924B2
· Bonderson et al.
· 2015
[cited by applicant]
US 9858531B1
· Monroe
· 2018
[cited by examiner]
US 20180241408A1
· Hayashi et al.
· 2018
[cited by applicant]
CN 102498496A
· 2012
[cited by applicant]
CN 104881268A
· 2015
[cited by applicant]
JP 2014090341A
· 2014
[cited by applicant]
JP 2015534410A
· 2015
[cited by applicant]
WO WO2016138378A1
· 2016
[cited by applicant]
WO WO2017065856A1
· 2017
[cited by applicant]
WO WO2017139683A1
· 2017
[cited by applicant]
WO WO2018089850A1
· 2018
[cited by applicant]
WO WO2020198581A1
· 2020
[cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/064609 mailed Jul. 31, 2017.
[cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2016/064609 mailed Jun. 14, 2018.
[cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 16892925.5, dated Jun. 28, 2019.
[cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/012438, mailed Aug. 12, 2019.
[cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2019/012438, mailed Jul. 16, 2020.
[cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 19756883.5, dated Aug. 6, 2021.
[cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US2020/025204, mailed Jun. 23, 2020.
[cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in International Application No. PCT/US2020/025204, mailed Oct. 7, 2021.
[cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 20776963.9, dated Nov. 25, 2022.
[cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2022/053675, mailed Apr. 6, 2023.
[cited by applicant]
Aaronson et al., BosonSampling with lost photons. Phys. Rev. A. Jan. 21, 2016;93:012335.
[cited by applicant]
Aaronson et al., The computational complexity of linear optics. Proceedings of the 43rd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC. Jun. 2011:333-42.
[cited by applicant]
Agarwal et al., Generation of pair coherent states and squeezing via the competition of four-wave mixing and amplified spontaneous emission. Physical review letters. Aug. 18, 1986;57(7):827.
[cited by applicant]
Albert et al., Performance and structure of single-mode bosonic codes. Physical Review A. Mar. 30, 2018;97(3):032346.
[cited by applicant]
Albert, Lindbladians with multiple steady states: theory and applications. Yale University Dissertation. May 2017, 134 pages.
[cited by applicant]
Albert, Proposal for a Logical Qubit Encoded into a Stabilized Manifold in Two Bosonic Modes. APS March Meeting 2018. Abstract Id V33.007, 1 page.
[cited by applicant]
Andrews et al., Bidirectional and efficient conversion between microwave and optical light. Nature Physics. Apr. 2014;10(4):321-6.
[cited by applicant]
Aoki et al., Quantum error correction beyond qubits. Nature Physics. Aug. 2009;5(8):541-6.
[cited by applicant]
Arrazola et al., Machine learning method for state preparation and gate synthesis on photonic quantum computers. Quantum Science and Technology. Jan. 22, 2019;4:024004.
[cited by applicant]
Baragiola et al., All-Gaussian universality and fault tolerance with the Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill code. Physical review letters. Nov. 13, 2019;123(20):200502.
[cited by applicant]
Barends et al., Coherent Josephson qubit suitable for scalable quantum integrated circuits. Physical review letters. Aug. 22, 2013;111(8):080502.
[cited by applicant]
Barends et al., Superconducting quantum circuits at the surface code threshold for fault tolerance. Nature. Apr. 2014;508(7497):500-3.
[cited by applicant]
Barut et al., New “coherent” states associated with non-compact groups. Communications in Mathematical Physics. Mar. 1, 1971;21(1):41-55.
[cited by applicant]
Bennet et al., Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction. Physical Review A. Nov. 1, 1996;54(5):3824-51.
[cited by applicant]
Bény et al., General conditions for approximate quantum error correction and near-optimal recovery channels. Physical review letters. Mar. 23, 2010;104(12):120501.
[cited by applicant]
Bény, Perturbative quantum error correction. Physical review letters. Aug. 16, 2011;107(8):080501.
[cited by applicant]
Bergmann et al., Quantum error correction against photon loss using NOON states. Phys. Rev. A. Jul. 7, 2016; 94:012311. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.94.012311.
[cited by applicant]
Bertet et al., Direct measurement of the Wigner function of a one-photon Fock state in a cavity. Physical Review Letters. Oct. 28, 2002;89(20):200402.
[cited by applicant]
Børkje et al., Observability of radiation-pressure shot noise in optomechanical systems. Physical Review A. Jul. 15, 2010;82(1):013818.
[cited by applicant]
Børkje et al., Signatures of nonlinear cavity optomechanics in the weak coupling regime. Physical review letters. Aug. 2, 2013;111(5):053603.
[cited by applicant]
Boulant et al., Experimental implementation of a concatenated quantum error-correcting code. Physical review letters. Apr. 8, 2005;94(13):130501.
[cited by applicant]
Bradley et al., Microwave cavity searches for dark-matter axions. Reviews of Modern Physics. Jun. 12, 2003;75(3):777-817.
[cited by applicant]
Braunstein et al., Quantum information with continuous variables. Reviews of Modern Physics. Jun. 29, 2005;77(2):513-77.
[cited by applicant]
Braunstein Quantum error correction for communication with linear optics. Nature. Jul. 2, 1998; 394:47-9.
[cited by applicant]
Braunstein, Error Correction for Continuous Quantum Variables. Phys. Rev. Lett. May 4, 1998;80(18):4084-7.
[cited by applicant]
Brecht et al., Multilayer microwave integrated quantum circuits for scalable quantum computing. NPJ Quantum Information. Feb. 23, 2016;2:16002.
[cited by applicant]
Cai et al., Bosonic quantum error correction codes in superconducting quantum circuits. Fundamental Research. Jan. 1, 2021;1(1):50-67.
[cited by applicant]
Campagne-Ibarq et al., Quantum error correction of a qubit encoded in grid states of an oscillator. Nature. Aug. 20, 2020;584(7821):368-72.
[cited by applicant]
Chembo et al., Modal expansion approach to optical-frequency-comb generation with monolithic whispering-gallery-mode resonators. Physical Review A. Sep. 7, 2010;82(3):033801.
[cited by applicant]
Chembo et al., Spatiotemporal Lugiato-Lefever formalism for Kerr-comb generation in whispering-gallery-mode resonators. Physical Review A. May 31, 2013;87(5):053852.
[cited by applicant]
Chen, Study of De-coherence of Coupled Systems of Charge Qubits and Nonlinear Nanomechanical Resonators. China Master's Thesis Full-Text Database (Basic Sciences Volume). Mar. 15, 2014;3:1-48.
[cited by applicant]
Chia Verini et al., Realization of quantum error correction. Nature. Dec. 2004;432(7017):602-5.
[cited by applicant]
Chiorescu et al., Coherent dynamics of a flux qubit coupled to a harmonic oscillator. Nature. Sep. 2004;431(7005):159-62.
[cited by applicant]
Chuang et al., Bosonic quantum codes for amplitude damping. Physical Review A. Aug. 1, 1997;56(2):1114.
[cited by applicant]
Cirac et al., Enforcing coherent evolution in dissipative quantum dynamics. Science. Aug. 30, 1996;273(5279):1207-10.
[cited by applicant]
Cirac et al., Quantum state transfer and entanglement distribution among distant nodes in a quantum network. Physical Review Letters. Apr. 21, 1997;78(16):3221-4.
[cited by applicant]
Clerk et al., Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification. Reviews of Modern Physics. Apr. 15, 2010;82(2):1155-208.
[cited by applicant]
Cochrane et al., Macroscopically distinct quantum-superposition states as a bosonic code for amplitude damping. Phys. Rev. 23 A. Apr. 1, 1999;59(4):2631-4. arXiv.quant-ph/9809037v2.
[cited by applicant]
Coen et al., Modeling of octave-spanning Kerr frequency combs using a generalized mean-field Lugiato-Lefever model. Optics letters. Jan. 1, 2013;38(1):37-9.
[cited by applicant]
Córcoles et al., Demonstration of a quantum error detection code using a square lattice of four superconducting qubits. Nature communications. Apr. 29, 2015;6:6979.
[cited by applicant]
Cory et al., Experimental quantum error correction. Physical Review Letters. Sep. 7, 1998;81(10):2152-5.
[cited by applicant]
Crépeau et al., Approximate quantum error-correcting codes and secret sharing schemes. Advances in Cryptology: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2005;3494:285-301.
[cited by applicant]
De Neeve et al., Error correction of a logical grid state qubit by dissipative pumping. Nature Physics. Mar. 2022;18(3):296-300.
[cited by applicant]
Devoret et al., Superconducting circuits for quantum information: an outlook. Science. Mar. 8, 2013;339(6124):1169-74.
[cited by applicant]
Dong, The q-Deformed Superposition States and Their Properties. Acta Optica Sinica. 1999;19(11):1452-8.
[cited by applicant]
Duivenvoorden et al., Single-mode displacement sensor. Physical Review A. Jan. 5, 2017;95(1):012305. arXiv:1603.02242v4 [quant-ph].
[cited by applicant]
Eaton et al., Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill State Preparation by Photon Catalysis. New Journal of Physics. Nov. 18, 2019;21:113034.
[cited by applicant]
Eisert et al. Distilling Gaussian states with Gaussian operations is impossible. Phys. Rev. Lett. Sep. 4, 2002;89:137903. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.137903.
[cited by applicant]
Faist et al., Continuous symmetries and approximate quantum error correction. Phys. Rev. X. Oct. 26, 2020;10:041018. arXiv:1902.07714v1 [quant-ph].
[cited by applicant]
Fletcher et al., Optimum quantum error recovery using semidefinite programming. Physical Review A. Jan. 31, 2007;75(1):012338.
[cited by applicant]
Flühmann et al., Direct characteristic-function tomography of quantum states of the trapped-ion motional oscillator. Physical Review Letters. Jul. 21, 2020;125(4):043602.
[cited by applicant]
Flühmann et al., Encoding a qubit in a trapped-ion mechanical oscillator. Nature. Feb. 27, 2019;566:513-7.
[cited by applicant]
Flühmann et al., Sequential modular position and momentum measurements of a trapped ion mechanical oscillator. Phys. Rev. X. Apr. 2, 2018; 8:021001.
[cited by applicant]
Flurin et al., Superconducting quantum node for entanglement and storage of microwave radiation. Physical review letters. Mar. 4, 2015;114(9):090503.
[cited by applicant]
Fowler Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A. Sep. 18, 2012; 86(032324): 48 pages.
[cited by applicant]
Frattini et al., 3-wave mixing Josephson dipole element. Applied Physics Letters. May 29, 2017;110(22):222603.
[cited by applicant]
Fukui et al., Analog quantum error correction with encoding a qubit into an oscillator. Phys. Rev. Lett. Nov. 10, 2017;119:180507.
[cited by applicant]
Gao et al., Noise properties of superconducting coplanar waveguide microwave resonators. Applied Physics Letters. Mar. 5, 2007;90(10):102507.
[cited by applicant]
Girvin, Basic concepts in quantum information. Strong Light-Matter Coupling: From Atoms to Solid-State Systems. 2013:155-206.
[cited by applicant]
Girvin, Wiring Up Quantum Systems: Circuit QED with Artificial Atoms and Microwave Photons. Conference on Coherence and Quantum Optics. Jun. 17, 2013:M4B-1.
[cited by applicant]
Gottesman et al., Encoding a qubit in an oscillator. Physical Review A. Jun. 11, 2001;64(1):012310.
[cited by applicant]
Gottesman Stabilizer codes and quantum error correction. Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology. May 21, 1997; 122 pages.
[cited by applicant]
Gottesman, An introduction to quantum error correction and fault-tolerant quantum computation. Quantum information science and its contributions to mathematics, Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics Apr. 2010;6…
[cited by applicant]
Grassl et al., Quantum error-correcting codes for qudit amplitude damping. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. Jun. 2018;64(6):4674-85.
[cited by applicant]
Hachohen-Gourgy et al.. Cooling and autonomous feedback in a bose-hubbard chain with attractive interactions. Physical review letters. Dec. 9, 2015;115(24):240501.
[cited by applicant]
Hafezi et al., Chemical potential for light by parametric coupling. Physical Review B. Nov. 19, 2015;92(17):174305.
[cited by applicant]
Harrington et al., Achievable rates for the Gaussian quantum channel. Phys. Rev. A. May 17, 2001;64:062301. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.64.062301.
[cited by applicant]
Hatridge et al., Quantum back-action of an individual variable-strength measurement. Science. Jan. 11, 2013;339(6116):178-81.
[cited by applicant]
Hayden et al., Error Correction of Quantum Reference Frame Information. PRX Quantum. Feb. 18, 2021;2:010326. arXiv:1709.04471v1 [quant-ph].
[cited by applicant]
Hayden et al., Spacetime replication of continuous variable quantum information. New J. Phys. Aug. 24, 2016;18(8):083043.
[cited by applicant]
Heeres et al., Cavity state manipulation using photon-number selective phase gates. Physical review letters. Sep. 22, 2015;115(13):137002.
[cited by applicant]
Helmer et al., Quantum nondemolition photon detection in circuit QED and the quantum Zeno effect. Physical Review A. May 20, 2009;79(5):052115.
[cited by applicant]
Hofheinz et al., Synthesizing arbitrary quantum states in a superconducting resonator. Nature. May 2009;459(7246):546.
[cited by applicant]
Holevo One-mode quantum Gaussian channels: Structure and quantum capacity. Problems of Information Transmission. Mar. 2007;43(1):1-11.
[cited by applicant]
Home et al., Complete methods set for scalable ion trap quantum information processing. Science. Sep. 4, 2009;325(5945):1227-30.
[cited by applicant]
Houck et al., Generating single microwave photons in a circuit. Nature. Sep. 2007;449(7160):328-31.
[cited by applicant]
Hu et al., Demonstration of quantum error correction and universal gate set operation on a binomial bosonic logical qubit. Nature Physics. Feb. 11, 2019; 15:503-8.
[cited by applicant]
Huh et al., Boson sampling for molecular vibronic spectra. Nature Photonics. Aug. 24, 2015;9:615-20.
[cited by applicant]
Ince et al., The case for open computer programs. Nature. Feb. 2012;482(7386):485-8.
[cited by applicant]
Kelly et al., State preservation by repetitive error detection in a superconducting quantum circuit. Nature. Mar. 2015;519(7541):66.
[cited by applicant]
Kienzler et al., Quantum harmonic oscillator state synthesis by reservoir engineering. Science. Jan. 2, 2015;347(6217):53-6.
[cited by applicant]
Kirchmair et al., Observation of quantum state collapse and revival due to the single-photon Kerr effect. Nature. Mar. 2013;495(7440):205-9.
[cited by applicant]
Knill et al. A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics. Nature, Jan. 4, 2001; 409(6816):46-52.
[cited by applicant]
Knill et al., Theory of quantum error-correcting codes. Physical Review A. Feb. 1, 1997;55(2):900.
[cited by applicant]
Koch et al., Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box. Physical Review A. Oct. 12, 2007;76(4):042319.
[cited by applicant]
Korotkov, Flying microwave qubits with nearly perfect transfer efficiency. Physical Review B. Jul. 25, 2011;84(1):014510.
[cited by applicant]
Krastanov et al., Universal control of an oscillator with dispersive coupling to a qubit. Physical Review A. Oct. 21, 2015;92(4):040303.
[cited by applicant]
Laflamme et al., Perfect quantum error correcting code. Physical Review Letters. Jul. 1, 1996;77(1):198-201.
[cited by applicant]
Lamont et al., Route to stabilized ultrabroadband microresonator-based frequency combs. Optics letters. Sep. 15, 2013;38(18):3478-81.
[cited by applicant]
Lamoreaux et al., Analysis of single-photon and linear amplifier detectors for microwave cavity dark matter axion searches. Physical Review D. Aug. 23, 2013;88(3):035020.
[cited by applicant]
Lassen et al., Quantum optical coherence can survive photon losses using a continuous-variable quantum erasure-correcting code. Nature Photonics. Oct. 2010;4(10):700-5.
[cited by applicant]
Leghtas et al., Confining the state of light to a quantum manifold by engineered two-photon loss. Science. Feb. 20, 2015;347(6224):853-7.
[cited by applicant]
Leghtas et al., Hardware-efficient autonomous quantum memory protection. Physical Review Letters. Sep. 20, 2013;111(12):120501.
[cited by applicant]
Leghtas et al., Stabilizing a Bell state of two superconducting qubits by dissipation engineering. Physical Review A. Aug. 27, 2013;88(2):023849.
[cited by applicant]
Leung et al., Approximate quantum error correction can lead to better codes. Physical Review A. Oct. 1, 1997;56(4):2567-73.
[cited by applicant]
Lidar et al., Decoherence-free subspaces for quantum computation. Physical Review Letters. Sep. 21, 1998;81(12):2594.
[cited by applicant]
Lloyd et al., Analog quantum error correction. Physical Review Letters. May 4, 1998;80(18):4088-91.
[cited by applicant]
Lloyd et al., Quantum computation over continuous variables. Phys. Rev. Lett. Feb. 22, 1999;82(8):1784-7.
[cited by applicant]
Mabuchi et al., Inversion of quantum jumps in quantum optical systems under continuous observation. Physical review letters. Apr. 22, 1996;76(17):3108-11.
[cited by applicant]
Marquardt et al., Optomechanics. Physics. 2009;2:40.
[cited by applicant]
Marquardt et al., Quantum theory of cavity-assisted sideband cooling of mechanical motion. Physical review letters. Aug. 28, 2007;99(9):093902.
[cited by applicant]
McKay et al., High-contrast qubit interactions using multimode cavity QED. Physical review letters. Feb. 27, 2015;114(8):080501.
[cited by applicant]
Meier et al., Signatures of quantum phase transitions in the dynamic response of fluxonium qubit chains. Physical Review B. Aug. 24, 2015;92(6):064516.
[cited by applicant]
Michael et al., New class of quantum error-correcting codes for a bosonic mode. Physical Review X. Jul. 14, 2016;6(3):031006.
[cited by applicant]
Mirrahimi et al., Dynamically protected cat-qubits: a new paradigm for universal quantum computation. New Journal of Physics. Apr. 22, 2014;16(4):045014.
[cited by applicant]
Morin et al., Shining light into black boxes. Science. Apr. 13, 2012;336(6078):159-60.
[cited by applicant]
Motes et al., Encoding qubits into oscillators with atomic emsembles and squeezed light. Phys. Rev. A. May 8, 2017;95(5):053819.
[cited by applicant]
Moussa et al., Demonstration of sufficient control for two rounds of quantum error correction in a solid state ensemble quantum information processor. Physical review letters. Oct. 10, 2011;107(16):160501.
[cited by applicant]
Mundhada et al., Generating higher-order quantum dissipation from lower-order parametric processes. Quantum Science and Technology. May 24, 20174;2(2):024005.
[cited by applicant]
Murch et al., Cavity-assisted quantum bath engineering. Physical review letters. Oct. 31, 2012;109(18):183602.
[cited by applicant]
Nakamura et al., Coherent control of macroscopic quantum states in a single-Cooper-pair box. Nature. Apr. 1999;398(6730):786-8.
[cited by applicant]
Nandkishore et al., Many-body localization and thermalization in quantum statistical mechanics. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys . . . Mar. 10, 2015;6(1):15-38.
[cited by applicant]
Ng, Simple approach to approximate quantum error correction based on the transpose channel. Physical Review A. Jun. 28, 2010;81(6):062342.
[cited by applicant]
Nielsen et al., Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge Series on Information and the Natural Sciences; Cambridge University Press. First published Oct. 23, 2000; 10th anniversary edition published Dec. 9…
[cited by applicant]
Nigg et al., Stabilizer quantum error correction toolbox for superconducting qubits. Physical Review Letters. Jun. 14, 2013;110(24):243604.
[cited by applicant]
Nigg et al., Black-box superconducting circuit quantization. Physical Review Letters. Jun. 12, 2012;108(24):240502.
[cited by applicant]
Nigg et al., Quantum computations on a topologically encoded qubit. Science. Jul. 18, 2014;345(6194):302-5.
[cited by applicant]
Niset et al., Experimentally feasible quantum erasure-correcting code for continuous variables. Physical review letters. Sep. 26, 2008;101(13):130503.
[cited by applicant]
Niset et al., No-go theorem for Gaussian quantum error correction. Phys. Rev. Lett. Mar. 24, 2009;102:120501.
[cited by applicant]
Niu et al., Hardware-efficient bosonic quantum error-correcting codes based on symmetry operators. Phys. Rev. A. Mar. 27, 2018;97:032323.
[cited by applicant]
Noh et al., Encoding an oscillator into many oscillators. Phys. Rev. Lett. Aug. 18, 2020;125:080503.
[cited by applicant]
Noh et al., Fault-tolerant bosonic quantum error correction with the surface-Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill code. Physical Review A. Jan. 13, 2020;101(1):012316.
[cited by applicant]
Noh et al., Quantum capacity bounds of Gaussian thermal loss channels and achievable rates with Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill codes. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. Apr. 2019;65(4):2563-82.
[cited by applicant]
Ofek et al., Demonstrating quantum error correction that extends the lifetime of quantum information. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1602.04768. Feb. 15, 2016, 44 pages.
[cited by applicant]
Ofek et al., Extending the lifetime of a quantum bit with error correction in superconducting circuits. Nature. Aug. 2016;536(7617):441-5.
[cited by applicant]
Paik et al., Observation of high coherence in Josephson junction qubits measured in a three-dimensional circuit QED architecture. Physical Review Letters. Dec. 5, 2011;107(24):240501.
[cited by applicant]
Peng, Reproducible research in computational science. Science. Dec. 2, 2011;334(6060):1226-7.
[cited by applicant]
Pirandola et al. Constructing finite-dimensional codes with optical continuous variables. Europhys. Lett. Oct. 1, 2004;68(323):0402202.
[cited by applicant]
Pirandola et al. Generating continuous variable quantum codewords in the near-field atomic lithography. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics. Feb. 1, 2006;39(4):997.
[cited by applicant]
Plenio et al., Quantum error correction in the presence of spontaneous emission. Physical Review A. Jan. 1, 1997;55(1):67-71.
[cited by applicant]
Reagor et al., Quantum memory with near-millisecond coherence in circuit QED. Phys Rev B. 2016;94:014506.
[cited by applicant]
Reagor et al., Reaching 10 ms single photon lifetimes for superconducting aluminum cavities. Applied Physics Letters. May 13, 2013;102(19):192604.
[cited by applicant]
Reed et al., Realization of three-qubit quantum error correction with superconducting circuits. Nature. Feb. 2012;482(7385):382-5.
[cited by applicant]
Rigetti et al., Superconducting qubit in a waveguide cavity with a coherence time approaching 0.1 ms. Physical Review B. Sep. 24, 2012;86(10):100506.
[cited by applicant]
Riste et al., Detecting bit-flip errors in a logical qubit using stabilizer measurements. Nature Communications. Apr. 29, 2015;6:6983.
[cited by applicant]
Romero et al., Microwave photon detector in circuit QED. Physical review letters. Apr. 29, 2009;102(17):173602.
[cited by applicant]
Royer et al. Stabilization of finite-energy Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill states. Physical Review Letters. Dec. 31, 2020;125(26):260509.
[cited by applicant]
Royer et al.. Encoding qubits in multimode grid states. PRX Quantum. Mar. 7, 2022;3(1):010335.
[cited by applicant]
Sayrin et al., Real-time quantum feedback prepares and stabilizes photon number states. Nature. Sep. 2011;477(7362):73-7.
[cited by applicant]
Schindler et al., Experimental repetitive quantum error correction. Science. May 27, 2011;332(6033):1059-61.
[cited by applicant]
Schoelkopf et al., Wiring up quantum systems. Nature. Feb. 6, 2008;451(7179):664-9.
[cited by applicant]
Schuster et al., Resolving photon number states in a superconducting circuit. Nature. Feb. 2007;445(7127):515-18.
[cited by applicant]
Sete et al., Robust quantum state transfer using tunable couplers. Physical Review B. Apr. 22, 2015;91(14):144509.
[cited by applicant]
Shankar et al., Autonomously stabilized entanglement between two superconducting quantum bits. Nature. Dec. 2013;504(7480):419.
[cited by applicant]
Shor, Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory. Physical review A. Oct. 1, 1995;52(4):R2493-6.
[cited by applicant]
Silveri et al., New class of photonic quantum error correction codes. APS March Meeting 2016, Abstract ID K44.005, 1 page.
[cited by applicant]
Silveri et al., Theory of remote entanglement via quantum-limited phase-preserving amplification. Physical Review A. Jun. 7, 2016;93(6):062310.
[cited by applicant]
Smith et al., Many-body localization in a quantum simulator with programmable random disorder. Nature Physics. Oct. 2016;12(10):907-10.
[cited by applicant]
Sparrow et al., Simulating the vibrational quantum dynamics of molecules using photonics. Nature. May 2018;557(7707):660-7.
[cited by applicant]
Srinivasan et al., Time-reversal symmetrization of spontaneous emission for quantum state transfer. Physical Review A. Mar. 31, 2014;89(3):033857.
[cited by applicant]
Srinivasan et al., Tunable coupling in circuit quantum electrodynamics using a superconducting charge qubit with a V-shaped energy level diagram. Physical review letters. Feb. 22, 2011;106(8):083601.
[cited by applicant]
Steane, Error correcting codes in quantum theory. Physical Review Letters. Jul. 29, 1996;77(5):793-7.
[cited by applicant]
Su et al., Conversion of Gaussian states to non-Gaussian states using photon-number-resolving detectors. Phys. Rev. A. Nov. 1, 2019; 100:052301.
[cited by applicant]
Sun et al., Tracking photon jumps with repeated quantum non-demolition parity measurements. Nature. Jul. 2014;511(7510):444-8.
[cited by applicant]
Sundaresan et al., Beyond strong coupling in a multimode cavity. Physical Review X. Jun. 29 2015;5(2):021035.
[cited by applicant]
Taminiau et al., Universal control and error correction in multi-qubit spin registers in diamond. Nature nanotechnology. Mar. 2014;9(3):171-6.
[cited by applicant]
Terhal et al., Encoding a qubit into a cavity mode in circuit QED using phase estimation. Physical Review A. Jan. 11, 2016;93(1):012315.
[cited by applicant]
Terhal, Quantum error correction for quantum memories. Reviews of Modern Physics. Apr. 7, 2015;87(2):307-46.
[cited by applicant]
Touzard et al., Coherent oscillations inside a quantum mani-fold stabilized by dissipation. Phys. Rev. X. Apr. 4, 2018; 8:021005 (7 pages).
[cited by applicant]
Touzard et al., Grid states for encoding and stabilizing a logical qubit in superconducting circuits (Part 2). APS March Meeting Abstracts 2019. Mar. 7, 2019:S27-005, 1 page. https://meetings.aps.org/Meeting/MAR19/Sessi…
[cited by applicant]
Travaglione et al. Preparing encoded states in an oscillator. Phys. Rev. A. Nov. 22, 2002;66:052322.
[cited by applicant]
Underwood et al., Measurement of the motional sidebands of a nanogram-scale oscillator in the quantum regime. Physical Review A. Dec. 2, 2015;92(6):061801.
[cited by applicant]
Vasconcelos et al., All-optical generation of states for “encoding a qubit in an oscillator”. Opt. Lett. Oct. 1, 2010;35(19):3261-3.
[cited by applicant]
Vlastakis et al., Deterministically encoding quantum information using 100-photon Schrödinger cat states. Science. Nov. 1, 2013;342(6158):607-10.
[cited by applicant]
Vlastakis et al., Violating Bell's inequality with an artificial atom and a cat state in a cavity. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1504.02512. Apr. 9, 2015.
[cited by applicant]
Vuillot et al., Quantum Error Correction with the toric Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill Code. Phys. Rev. A. Mar. 29, 2019;99:032344. arXiv:1810.00047v2 [quant-ph].
[cited by applicant]
Waldherr et al., Quantum error correction in a solid-state hybrid spin register. Nature. Feb. 2014;506(7487):204-7.
[cited by applicant]
Wang et al., A Schrödinger cat living in two boxes. Science. May 27, 2016;352(6289):1087-91.
[cited by applicant]
Weedbrook et al., Gaussian quantum information. Rev. Mod. Phys. May 1, 2012;84:621-69.
[cited by applicant]
Weigand et al., Generating Grid States From Schrödinger Cat States Without Postselection. Phys. Rev. A. Feb. 28, 2018;97:022341.
[cited by applicant]
Wenner et al., Catching time-reversed microwave coherent state photons with 99.4% absorption efficiency. Physical Review Letters. May 28, 2014;112(21):210501.
[cited by applicant]
Wilson-Rae et al., Theory of ground state cooling of a mechanical oscillator using dynamical backaction. Physical Review Letters. Aug. 28, 2007;99(9):093901.
[cited by applicant]
Yin et al., Catch and release of microwave photon states. Physical review letters. Mar. 4, 2013;110(10):107001.
[cited by applicant]
Yurke et al., SU (2) and SU (1, 1) interferometers. Physical Review A. Jun. 1, 1986;33(6):4033-54.
[cited by applicant]
Yurke et al., The dynamic generation of Schrödinger cats and their detection. Physica B. Jul. 1, 1988;151(1-2):298-301.
[cited by applicant]
Zanardi et al., Noiseless quantum codes. Physical Review Letters. Oct. 27, 1997;79(17):3306.
[cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., Experimental implementation of encoded logical qubit operations in a perfect quantum error correcting code. Physical review letters. Sep. 6, 2012;109(10):100503.
[cited by applicant]
Zheng et al., Demonstrating non-Abelian statistics of Majorana fermions using twist defects. Physical Review B. Dec. 31, 2015;92(24):245139.
[cited by applicant]
Zueco et al., Qubit-oscillator dynamics in the dispersive regime: analytical theory beyond rotating-wave approximation. Physical Review A. 2009;80:033846.
[cited by applicant]
Kitaev, Quantum error correction with imperfect gates. Quantum Communication, Computing, and Measurement. Jul. 1997;181-8.
[cited by applicant]
Shapiro et al., Optical communication with two-photon coherent states-part II: Photoemissive detection and structured receiver performance. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. Mar. 1979;25(2):179-92.
[cited by applicant]
Zak, Finite translations in solid-state physics. Physical Review Letters. Dec. 11, 1967;19(24):1385.
[cited by applicant]
PCT/US2016/064609, Jul. 31, 2017, International Search Report and Written Opinion.
[cited by applicant]
PCT/US2016/064609, Jun. 14, 2018, International Preliminary Report on Patentability.
[cited by applicant]
EP16892925.5, Jun. 28, 2019, Extended European Search Report.
[cited by applicant]
PCT/US2019/012438, Aug. 12, 2019, International Search Report and Written Opinion.
[cited by applicant]
PCT/US2019/012438, Jul. 16, 2020, International Preliminary Report on Patentability.
[cited by applicant]
EP19756883.5, Aug. 6, 2021, Extended European Search Report.
[cited by applicant]
PCT/US2020/025204, Jun. 23, 2020, International Search Report and Written Opinion.
[cited by applicant]
PCT/US2020/025204, Oct. 7, 2021, International Preliminiary Report on Patentability.
[cited by applicant]
EP20776963.9, Nov. 25, 2022, Extended European Search Report.
[cited by applicant]
PCT/US2022/053675, Apr. 6, 2023, International Search Report and Written Opinion.
[cited by applicant]
Cited By (1)