IP Library Granted Patent US 12,369,539
Granted Patent B2
US 12,369,539 · App. 18/012,166 · Granted Jul 29, 2025

System and method for managing irrigation of a field plot for a growing season

Inventors: Ran Pelta (Golan Heights, IL); Ofer Beeri (Kibbutz Yagur, IL); Tal Shilo (Yokneam, IL); Shay Mey-tal (Herzliya, IL)
Assignee: Manna Irrigation Ltd.
A01G25/16G05B19/042G05B2219/2625
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,369,539
App. No.
18/012,166
Granted
Jul 29, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

An irrigation management method constituted of: applying a global RSP model to received GIV values to forecast global RSP values; and applying a plot-specific RSP model to receive PS IV values to forecast plot-specific RSP values, wherein responsive to the forecast global and plot-specific RSP values, a forecast ETO and measured plot-specific RSP values, the method is further constituted of: generating an ETc curve; responsive to the generated ETc curve, determining a growing season water amount for the field plot and/or determining a next irrigation water amount for the field plot; and outputting to a device the determined growing season water amount and/or the determined next irrigation water amount such that irrigation of the field plot can be adjusted.

Claims (104)

1. A computerized method for managing irrigation of a crop in a field plot for a growing season, the method comprising:

receiving values of one or more forecast global independent variables (GIVs);

applying a global remote sensing product (RSP) model to the received values of the forecast GIVs and, responsive to the applied global RSP model, determining forecast global RSP values;

receiving values of forecast plot-specific independent variables (PSIVs) associated with the field plot;

applying a plot-specific RSP model to the received values of the forecast PSIVs and, responsive to the applied plot-specific RSP model, determining forecast plot-specific RSP values;

receiving a forecasted reference evapotranspiration (ET0) associated with the field plot; and

receiving one or more actual plot-specific RSP values associated with the field plot,

wherein, responsive to the forecast global RSP values, the forecast plot-specific RSP values, the forecast ET0 and the actual plot-specific RSP values, the method further comprises:

generating a first crop evapotranspiration (ETc) curve;

responsive to the generated first ETc curve, determining a growing season water amount for the field plot and/or determining a next irrigation water amount for the field plot; and

outputting to a device the determined growing season water amount and/or the determined next irrigation water amount such that irrigation of the field plot can be adjusted.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the global RSP model comprises a plurality of sub-models, each of the plurality of sub-models associated with a respective global attribute.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the receiving values of forecast GIVs is performed at respective predetermined intervals during the growing season,

wherein the receiving values of forecast PSIVs is performed at respective predetermined intervals during the growing season, and

wherein the receiving actual plot-specific RSP values is performed at respective predetermined intervals during the growing season.

4. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

responsive to the actual plot-specific RSP values and the forecast ET0, generating a second ETc curve;

responsive to the forecast global RSP values and the forecast ET0, generating a third ETc curve; and

responsive to the forecast plot-specific RSP values and the forecast ET0, generating a fourth ETc curve,

wherein the generation of the first ETc curve is responsive to the second, third and fourth ETc curves.

5. The method according to claim 4 , further comprising:

determining a respective difference between a historical ETc curve associated with the field-plot and historical curves of the second, third and fourth ETc curves; and

responsive to the determined differences, determining a respective weight for each of the second, third and fourth ETc curves,

wherein the generation of the first ETc curve is further responsive to the respective weights for each of the second, third and fourth ETc curves.

6. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

receiving values of past/present GIVs;

applying the global RSP model to the received values of the past/present GIVs and, responsive to the applied global RSP model, determining seasonal global RSP values;

receiving values of past/present PSIVs associated with the field plot;

applying the plot-specific RSP model to the received values of the past/present PSIVs and, responsive to the applied plot-specific RSP model, determining seasonal plot-specific RSP values;

receiving a value associated with a historical ET0 associated with the field plot; and

receiving a crop coefficient (Kc) associated with the field plot,

wherein, responsive to the seasonal global RSP values, the seasonal plot-specific RSP values, the historical ET0 value and the Kc, the method further comprises:

generating a fifth ETc curve; and

responsive to the determined fifth ETc curve and the generated first ETc curve, generating a sixth ETc curve, the determination of the growing season water amount for the field plot responsive to the generated sixth ETc curve.

7. The method according to claim 6 , further comprising performing a summation of the sixth ETc curve, the determination of the growing season water amount for the field plot responsive to an outcome of the summation of the sixth ETc curve.

8. The method according to claim 6 , further comprising:

responsive to the historical ET0 value and the Kc, generating a seventh ETc curve;

responsive to the seasonal global RSP values and the historical ET0 value, generating an eighth ETc curve; and

responsive to the seasonal plot-specific RSP values and the historical ET0 value, generating a ninth ETc curve,

wherein the generation of the fifth ETc curve is responsive to the seventh, eighth and ninth ETc curves.

9. The method according to claim 8 , further comprising:

determining a respective difference between a historical ETc curve associated with the field-plot and historical curves of each of the seventh, eighth and ninth ETc curves; and

responsive to the determined differences, determining a respective weight for each of the seventh, eighth and ninth ETc curves,

wherein the generation of the fifth ETc curve is further responsive to the respective weights for each of the seventh, eighth and ninth ETc curves.

10. The method according to claim 8 , further comprising:

responsive to the first ETc curve and the fifth ETc curve, determining one or more regression functions defining a relationship between the first ETc curve and the fifth ETc curve; and

comparing a regression metric of the determined one or more regression functions to a predetermined threshold,

wherein, responsive to an outcome of the comparison indicating that the regression metric is greater than the predetermined threshold, the sixth ETc curve is a product of the fifth ETc curve and regression coefficients of the predetermined regression function, and

wherein, responsive to the outcome of the comparison indicating that the regression metric is not greater than the predetermined threshold, the sixth ETc curve is a respective predetermined function of the first ETc curve, the eight ETc curve and the ninth ETc curve.

11. The method according to claim 8 , wherein the sixth ETc curve is a respective predetermined function of the first and fifth ETc curves.

12. The method according to claim 8 , further comprising:

receiving actual global RSP values;

applying a first plot water stress (PWS) model to the received actual global RSP values measured plot-specific RSP values and, responsive to the applied first PWS model, determining a first set of PWS coefficient values for global plots;

responsive to the generated eighth ETc curve, defining a plurality of periods within the growing season associated with growth phases of the crop;

applying a second PWS model to the determined first set of PWS coefficient values and, responsive to the applied second PWS model, determining a past/present PWS curve for a crop of the field plot for each of the plurality of periods;

receiving flux data and/or thermal measurements of the global plots;

applying a third PWS model to the received flux data and/or thermal measurements;

responsive to the applied third PWS model, determining a second set of PWS coefficient values for the field plot, the second set of PWS coefficient values for the field plot input into the second PWS model such that the determined past/present PWS curve is responsive to the second set of PWS coefficient values;

applying a fourth PWS model to the receive flux data and/or thermal measurements;

responsive to the applied fourth PWS model, determining a PWS reduction rate;

responsive to the determined PWS reduction rate and the past/present PWS curve, determining forecast PWS values for the field plot; and

responsive to the determined past/present PWS curve, the determined forecast PWS values and the first ETc curve, generating a tenth ETc curve,

wherein the determination of the next irrigation water amount for the field plot is responsive to the generated tenth ETc curve.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the first set of PWS coefficient values comprises a plurality of subsets of PWS coefficient values, each of the plurality of subsets associated with a respective one of a plurality of portions of the field plot,

wherein the method further comprises applying a fifth PWS model to the first set of PWS coefficient values and, responsive to the applied fifth PWS model, determining a respective optimal PWS curves for each of the plurality of portions of the field plot for each of the plurality of periods, and

wherein the generation of the tenth ETc curve is further responsive to the respective optimal PWS curves for each of the plurality of portions of the field plot.

14. The method of claim 12 , further comprising, responsive to the forecast PWS values for the field plot, determining an optimal date for the next irrigation of the field plot.

15. A system for managing irrigation of a crop in a field plot for a growing season, the system comprising:

one or more processors;

a communication unit; and

a memory, the memory having a plurality of instructions stored thereon, the plurality of instructions arranged, when executed by the one or more processors, to cause the one or more processors to:

responsive to the communication unit, receive values of one or more forecast global independent variables (GIVs);

apply a global remote sensing product (RSP) model to the received values of the forecast GIVs and, responsive to the applied global RSP model, determine forecast global RSP values;

responsive to the communication unit, receive values of forecast plot-specific independent variables (PSIVs) associated with the field plot;

applying a plot-specific RSP model to the received values of the forecast PSIVs and, responsive to the applied plot-specific RSP model, determining forecast plot-specific RSP values;

responsive to the communication unit, receive a forecasted reference evapotranspiration (ET0) associated with the field plot; and

responsive to the communication unit, receive one or more actual plot-specific RSP values associated with the field plot,

wherein, responsive to the forecast global RSP values, the forecast plot-specific RSP values, the forecast ET0 and the actual plot-specific RSP values, the plurality of instructions are further arranged to cause the one or more processors to:

generate a first crop evapotranspiration (ETc) curve;

responsive to the generated first ETc curve, determine a growing season water amount for the field plot and/or determine a next irrigation water amount for the field plot; and

output, via the communication unit, to a device the determined growing season water amount and/or the determined next irrigation water amount such that irrigation of the field plot can be adjusted.

16. The system of claim 15 , wherein the global RSP model comprises a plurality of sub-models, each of the plurality of sub-models associated with a respective global attribute.

17. The system of claim 15 , wherein the receipt of values of forecast GIVs is performed at respective predetermined intervals during the growing season,

wherein the receipt of values of forecast PSIVs is performed at respective predetermined intervals during the growing season, and

wherein the receipt of actual plot-specific RSP values is performed at respective predetermined intervals during the growing season.

18. The system according to claim 15 , wherein the plurality of instructions are further arranged to cause the one or more processors to:

responsive to the actual plot-specific RSP values and the forecast ET0, generate a second ETc curve;

responsive to the forecast global RSP values and the forecast ET0, generate a third ETc curve; and

responsive to the forecast plot-specific RSP values and the forecast ET0, generate a fourth ETc curve,

wherein the generation of the first ETc curve is responsive to the second, third and fourth ETc curves.

19. The system according to claim 18 , wherein the plurality of instructions are further arranged to cause the one or more processors to:

determine a respective difference between a historical ETc curve associated with the field-plot and historical curves of the second, third and fourth ETc curves; and

responsive to the determined differences, determine a respective weight for each of the second, third and fourth ETc curves, and

wherein the generation of the first ETc curve is further responsive to the respective weights for each of the second, third and fourth ETc curves.

20. The system according to claim 15 , wherein the plurality of instructions are further arranged to cause the one or more processors to:

responsive to the communication unit, receive values of past/present GIVs;

apply the global RSP model to the received values of the past/present GIVs and, responsive to the applied global RSP model, determine seasonal global RSP values;

responsive to the communication unit, receive values of past/present PSIVs associated with the field plot;

apply the plot-specific RSP model to the received values of the past/present PSIVs and, responsive to the applied plot-specific RSP model, determine seasonal plot-specific RSP values;

responsive to the communication unit, receive a value associated with a historical ET0 associated with the field plot; and

responsive to the communication unit, receive a crop coefficient (Kc) associated with the field plot, and

wherein, responsive to the seasonal global RSP values, the seasonal plot-specific RSP values, the historical ET0 value and the Kc, the plurality of instructions are further arranged to cause the one or more processors to:

generate a fifth ETc curve; and

responsive to the determined fifth ETc curve and the generated first ETc curve, generate a sixth ETc curve, the determination of the growing season water amount for the field plot responsive to the generated sixth ETc curve.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 13, 2023
From: PELTA, RAN; BEERI, OFER; SHILO, TAL; MEY-TAL, SHAY
To: MANNA IRRIGATION LTD.
Reel/Frame 063072/0398 →
Priority Claims (1)
IL 275559 · Jun 22, 2020 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230270060A1 · Aug 31, 2023
References Cited (24)
US 10188049B1 · Emanuel · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20160057949A1 · Williams · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20190230875A1 · Mewes · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20220304262A1 · Ciarletti · 2022 [cited by examiner]
WO 2019008570A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019198072A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
Sanyogita Andriyas, “Analysis of Irrigation Decision Behavior and Forecasting Future Irrigation Decisions,” Utah State University, Dec. 2012 (Year: 2012). [cited by examiner]
Abyaneh et al., (2011) Determination of water requirement, single and dual crop coefficient of garlic (‘Allium sativum’) in the cold semi-arid climate. Australian Journal of Crop Science 5(8): 1050-1054. [cited by applicant]
Allen and Pereira (2009) Estimating crop coefficients from fraction of ground cover and height. Irrig Sci 28: 17-34. [cited by applicant]
Beeri et al., (2019) Accuracy of crop coefficient estimation methods based on satellite imagery. In: Precision agriculture 19; edited by: John V. Stafford. Wageningen Academic Publishers. pp. 437-444. Abstract. [cited by applicant]
Chlingaryan et al., (2018) Machine learning approaches for crop yield prediction and nitrogen status estimation in precision agriculture: A review. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 151: 61-69. Abstract. [cited by applicant]
Hargreaves and Samani (1985) Reference Crop Evapotranspiration from Temperature. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 1(2): 96-99. Abstract. [cited by applicant]
Helman et al., (2017) A biophysical approach using water deficit factor for daily estimations of evapotranspiration and CO2 uptake in Mediterranean environments. Biogeosciences 14(17): 3909-3926. [cited by applicant]
Houtekamer and Mitchell (1998) Data Assimilation Using an Ensemble Kalman Filter Technique. Monthly Weather Review 126(3): 796-811. [cited by applicant]
Jackson et al., (1988) A reexamination of the crop water stress index. Irrigation Science 9: 309-317. [cited by applicant]
Johnson and Trout (2012) Satellite NDVI Assisted Monitoring of Vegetable Crop Evapotranspiration in California's San Joaquin Valley. Remote Sensing 4: 439-455. [cited by applicant]
LeMone et al., (2007) Influence of Land Cover and Soil Moisture on the Horizontal Distribution of Sensible and Latent Heat Fluxes in Southeast Kansas during IHOP_2002 and CASES-97. Journal of Hydrometeorology 8: 68-87. [cited by applicant]
Nagler et al., (2013) Estimating Riparian and Agricultural Actual Evapotranspiration by Reference Evapotranspiration and MODIS Enhanced Vegetation Index. Remote Sensing 5: 3849-3871. [cited by applicant]
O'Shaughnessy et al., (2012) A crop water stress index and time threshold for automatic irrigation scheduling of grain sorghum. Agricultural Water Management 107: 122-132. [cited by applicant]
Snyder et al., (2006) A fuel dryness index for grassland fire-danger assessment. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 139(1-2): 1-11. [cited by applicant]
Tasumi et al., (2006) Calibrating Satellite-Based Vegetation Indices to Estimate Evapotranspiration and Crop Coefficients. Ground Water and Surface Water Under Stress: Competition, Interaction, Solutions, A USCID Water … [cited by applicant]
Tewes et al., (2020) New Approaches for the Assimilation of LAI Measurements into a Crop Model Ensemble to Improve Wheat Biomass Estimations. Agronomy 10(3): 446; 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wilson et al., (2002) Energy partitioning between latent and sensible heat flux during the warm season at FLUXNET sites. Water Resources Research 38(12): 1294; 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Analysis of Irrigation Decision Behavior and Forecasting Future Irrigation Decisions. Sanyogita Andriyas, Utah State University, Dec. 2012 Sanyogita Andriyas Dec. 31, 2012 (Dec. 31, 2012). Dissert., Retrieved from: http… [cited by applicant]